32 found
Order:
See also
Daniel Simons
University of Manchester
  1. Change Blindness: Past, Present, and Future.Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):16-20.
    Change blindness is the striking failure to see large changes that normally would be noticed easily. Over the past decade this phenomenon has greatly contributed to our understanding of attention, perception, and even consciousness. The surprising extent of change blindness explains its broad appeal, but its counterintuitive nature has also engendered confusions about the kinds of inferences that legitimately follow from it. Here we discuss the legitimate and the erroneous inferences that have been drawn, and offer a set of requirements (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  2. Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events.Daniel J. Simons & Christopher Chabris - 1999 - Perception 28 (9):1059-1074.
  3. Change Blindness.Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin - 1997 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 (1):241-82.
  4.  87
    What You See is What You Set: Sustained Inattentional Blindness and the Capture of Awareness.Steve Most, Brian J. Scholl, E. Clifford & Daniel J. Simons - 2005 - Psychological Review 112 (1):217-242.
  5.  88
    Current Approaches to Change Blindness.Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7:1-15.
  6. Change Blindness in the Absence of a Visual Disruption.Daniel J. Simons, Steven Franconeri & Rebecca Reimer - 2000 - Perception 29 (10):1143-1154.
  7. Attentional Capture and Inattentional Blindness.Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (4):147-155.
  8. Change Blindness Blindness: The Metacognitive Error of Overestimating Change-Detection Ability.Daniel T. Levin, Nausheen Momen, Sarah B. Drivdahl & Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7 (1):397-412.
  9.  11
    The Size and Shape of the Attentional “Spotlight” Varies with Differences in Sports Expertise.Stefanie Hüttermann, Daniel Memmert & Daniel J. Simons - 2014 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 20 (2):147-157.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  10. Evidence for Preserved Representations in Change Blindness.Daniel J. Simons, Christopher Chabris & Tatiana Schnur - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (1):78-97.
    People often fail to detect large changes to scenes, provided that the changes occur during a visual disruption. This phenomenon, known as ''change blindness,'' occurs both in the laboratory and in real-world situations in which changes occur unexpectedly. The pervasiveness of the inability to detect changes is consistent with the theoretical notion that we internally represent relatively little information from our visual world from one glance at a scene to the next. However, evidence for change blindness does not necessarily imply (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  11. The Relationship Between Change Detection and Recognition of Centrally Attended Objects in Motion Pictures.Bonnie L. Angelone, Daniel T. Levin & Daniel J. Simons - 2003 - Perception 32 (8):947-962.
  12.  11
    An Abstract to Concrete Shift in the Development of Biological Thought: The Insides Story.Daniel J. Simons & Frank C. Keil - 1995 - Cognition 56 (2):129-163.
  13.  30
    The Siren Song of Implicit Change Detection.Stephen R. Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons & Steven Franconeri - 2002 - Journal Of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception And Performance 28 (4):798-815.
  14.  5
    Does Working Memory Capacity Predict Cross-Modally Induced Failures of Awareness?Carina Kreitz, Philip Furley, Daniel J. Simons & Daniel Memmert - 2016 - Consciousness and Cognition 39:18-27.
  15. Memory for Centrally Attended Changing Objects in an Incidental Real-World Change Detection Paradigm.Daniel T. Levin, Daniel J. Simons, Bonnie L. Angelone & Christopher Chabris - 2002 - British Journal of Psychology 93:289-302.
  16. Behavioral, Neuroimaging, and Neuropsychological Approaches to Implicit Perception.Daniel J. Simons, Deborah E. Hannula, David E. Warren & Steven W. Day - 2007 - In Philip David Zelazo, Morris Moscovitch & Evan Thompson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  17.  75
    Sustained Inattentional Blindness: The Role of Location in the Detection of Unexpected Dynamic Events.Steve Most, Daniel J. Simons, Brian J. Scholl & Christopher Chabris - 2000 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 6.
    Attempts to understand visual attention have produced models based on location, in which attention selects particular regions of space, and models based on other visual attributes . Previous studies of inattentional blindness have contributed to our understanding of attention by suggesting that the detection of an unexpected object depends on the distance of that object from the spatial focus of attention. When the distance of a briefly flashed object from both fixation and the focus of attention is systematically varied, detection (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  18.  14
    Active and Passive Scene Recognition Across Views.Ranxiao Frances Wang & Daniel J. Simons - 1999 - Cognition 70 (2):191-210.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  19. Change Blindness, Representations, and Consciousness: Reply to Noe.Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (5):219.
  20.  46
    Nothing Compares 2 Views: Change Blindness Results From Failures to Compare Retained Information.Steve Mitroff, Daniel J. Simons & Daniel T. Levin - 2004 - Perception and Psychophysics 66 (8):1268-1281.
  21.  3
    Moving and Looming Stimuli Capture Attention.Steve Franconeri & Daniel J. Simons - 2003 - Perception and Psychophysics 65 (7):999-1010.
  22.  62
    Changes Are Not Localized Before They Are Explicitly Detected.Stephen R. Mitroff & Daniel J. Simons - 2000 - Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 41 (4).
  23.  8
    Constraints on Generality Statements Are Needed to Define Direct Replication.Daniel J. Simons, Yuichi Shoda & D. Stephen Lindsay - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  26
    Change Blindness, Gibson, and the Sensorimotor Theory of Vision.Brian J. Scholl & Daniel J. Simons - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1004-1006.
    We suggest that the sensorimotor “theory” of vision is really an unstructured collection of separate ideas, and that much of the evidence cited in its favor at best supports only a subset of these ideas. As an example, we note that work on change blindness does not “vindicate” (or even speak to) much of the sensorimotor framework. Moreover, the ideas themselves are not always internally consistent. Finally, the proposed framework draws on ideas initially espoused by James Gibson, but does little (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  16
    Perception Versus Inference.Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2005 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 (1):16-20.
  26.  30
    Induced Failures of Visual Awareness.Daniel J. Simons & Ron Rensink - 2003 - Journal of Vision 2 (3).
  27.  20
    Scene Perception: What We Can Learn From Visual Integration and Change Detection.Daniel J. Simons, Steve Mitroff & Steve Franconeri - 2003 - In Michael L. Peterson & G. Rhodes (eds.), Perception of Faces, Objects, and Scenes: Analytic and Holistic Processes (335-355). Oxford University Press.
  28.  4
    Everyday Planning: An Analysis of Daily Time Management.Daniel J. Simons & Kathleen M. Galotti - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (1):61-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  3
    Searching for Stimulus-Driven Shifts of Attention.Steve Franconeri, Daniel J. Simons & J. Junge - 2004 - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 11 (5):876-881.
  30.  1
    Links Between Neuroticism, Emotional Distress, and Disengaging Attention: Evidence From a Single-Target RSVP Task.Keith Bredemeier, Howard Berenbaum, Steven B. Most & Daniel J. Simons - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (8):1510-1519.
  31. Attention Capture, Orienting, and Awareness.Steven B. Most & Daniel J. Simons - 2001 - In Charles L. Folk & Bradley S. Gibson (eds.), Attraction, Distraction and Action: Multiple Perspectives on Attentional Capture. Advances in Psychology. Elsevier. pp. 151-173.
  32. Nachshon Meiran, Bernhard Hommel, Uri Bibi, and Idit Lev. Consciousness and Control in Task.Paul Skokowski, Daniel J. Simons, Christopher F. Chabris, Tatiana Schnur, Daniel T. Levin, Boris Kotchoubey, Andrea Kübler, Ute Strehl, Niels Birbaumer & Jürgen Fell - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10:598.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark