74 found
Order:
See also
Daniel Laurier
Université de Montréal
  1.  60
    Pragmatics, Pittsburgh Style.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):141-160.
    I give a rough outline of Brandom¿s scorekeeping account of conceptual content. The account is meant to be phenomenalist, normativist, expressively complete and non-circular; the question is how and to what extent it succeeds in meeting these goals.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2. Nonconceptual Contents Vs Nonconceptual States.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 68 (1):23-43.
    The question to be discussed is whether the distinction between the conceptual and the nonconceptual is best understood as pertaining primarily to intentional contents or to intentional states or attitudes. Some authors have suggested that it must be understood in the second way, in order to make the claim that experiences are nonconceptual compatible with the idea that one can also believe what one experiences. I argue that there is no need to do so, and that a conceptual content can (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3.  1
    Pragmatics, Pittsburgh Style.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Pragmatics and Cognitionpragmatics and Cognition 13 (1):141-160.
    I give a rough outline of Brandom's scorekeeping account of conceptual content. The account is meant to be phenomenalist, normativist, expressively complete and non-circular; the question is how and to what extent it succeeds in meeting these goals.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  36
    Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint.Daniel Laurier - 2011 - Dialogue 50 (2):315-331.
    ABSTRACT: I explain and rebut four objections to the claim that attributions of intentional attitudes are normative judgments, all stemming, directly or indirectly, from the widespread assumption that the normative supervenes on the non-normative.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  28
    Between Phenomenalism and Objectivism.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:189-214.
    Brandom (1994) claims to have succeeded in showing how certain kinds of social practices can institute objective deontic statuses and confer objective conceptual contents on certain performances. This paper proposes a reconstruction of how, on Brandom’s views, this is supposed to come about, and a critical examination of the explicit arguments offered in support for this claim.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  24
    Names and Beliefs: A Puzzle Lost.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Philosophical Quarterly 36 (142):37-49.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7. L'esprit Et la Nature.Daniel Laurier - 2002
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  5
    Between Phenomenalism and Objectivism: An Examination of R. Brandom's Account of the Objectivity of Discursive Deontic Statuses.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:189-214.
    Brandom claims to have succeeded in showing how certain kinds of social practices can institute objective deontic statuses and confer objective conceptual contents on certain performances. This paper proposes a reconstruction of how, on Brandom’s views, this is supposed to come about, and a critical examination of the explicit arguments offered in support for this claim.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  59
    In Search of Objective Agent Rationality.Daniel Laurier - manuscript
    The purpose of this paper is to offer an account of what an agent's being rational to do or think something might amount to, which doesn't reduce to saying that it consists in this agent's doing or thinking something that is rational for him. In the first section, I call attention to the fact that such a distinction between agent rationality and action or belief rationality is widely admitted, I reject the idea that it could be interpreted as a distinction (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  12
    Nouvelles catégories pour l'analyse du sens du locuteur.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialectica 40 (2):87-106.
    RésuméLe sens intentionnel ?une énonciation comprend selon Grice un acte illocutoire principal et des actes illocutoires secondaires, qui peuvent être soit des implicatures conventionnelles soit des implkatures non‐conventionnelles. Je montre que cette analyse, sous ľnterprétation visée par Grice, est défectueuse en ceci que i) elle exclut que ľacte illocutoire principal puisse être non littéral, ii) elle ne rend pas compte de ce que les implicatures conventionnelles sont annulables et iii) elle confond sous ľappellation ?implicature non conventionnelle deux types de phénomènes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  25
    What Does Intentional Normativism Require?Daniel Laurier - forthcoming - Philosophical Explorations.
  12.  42
    The Publicity of Thought and Language.Daniel Laurier - unknown
    The sceptical problem of Kripkenstein pertains to both the notions of content of thought and linguistic meaning in such a way that if the sceptical solution allowed us to conclude that language is essentially public, then we should also be able to conclude that thought is essentially public. But, when addressing the question of the way in which one could, under this hypothesis, reach the conclusion that thought is essentially public, there would seem to be two possible types of answers. (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  42
    La Publicité Et L’Interdépendance du Langage Et de la Pensée.Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Dialogue 43 (2):281-315.
    I clarify in what sense one might want to claim that thought or language are public. I distinguish among four forms that each of these claims might take, and two general ways of establishing them that might be contemplated. The first infers the public character of thought from the public character of language, and the second infers the latter from the former. I show that neither of these stategies seems to be able to dispense with the claim that thought and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  7
    Rationality and Intentionality.Daniel Laurier - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43:125-141.
    The view that in radical interpretation, the interpreter should aim at optimizing the rationality of agents is defended. A distinction and a parallel is drawn between linguistic interpretation and psychological interpretation. Both can be taken to be governed, in part, and in somewhat different ways, by a principle of rationality. Such approaches have been criticised on the ground that they make it impossible for a speaker or an agent to have wildly irrational or false beliefs. It is argued that the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Essais Sur le Sens Et la Réalité.Daniel Laurier - 1991
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  22
    Pangloss, L'Erreur Et La Divergence.Daniel Laurier - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Research 19:345-372.
    The theory of radical interpretation, as based on the principle of charity, sets a priori limits on the possibility that different agents have different beliefs, and on the possibility that one has false beliefs. David Papineau put forward a teleological approach to intentional states which, he claims, doesn’t have these unacceptable consequences. Having distinguished half a dozen of different forms that the problem of radical interpretation might take, I show that Papineau’s approach is not radically different from those based on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  44
    Reasons, Contents, and Experiences.Daniel Laurier - 2004 - Disputatio 1 (17):1 - 21.
  18.  44
    Mind, Davidson and Reality.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Principia 9 (1-2):125-157.
    The aim of this article is to show that the prospects for intentional irrealism are much brighter than it is generally thought. In the first section, I provide a general haracterization of some of the various forms that the realism/irrealism debates might take. In the second, I ask whether there is any defensible form of realism about intentional states. I show that most candidates are nearly trivially false, and that the only form of intentional realism which is not, is a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  43
    Review of Maria Cristina Amoretti, Nicla Vassallo (Eds.), Knowledge, Language, and Interpretation: On the Philosophy of Donald Davidson[REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (11).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  19
    La langue d'une population: le lien entre la sémantique et la pragmatique.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialectica 40 (4):251-272.
    RésuméCet article vise à préciser la nature et le contenu des conventions qui lient les membres d'une communauté linguistique et par ce biais à caractériser les relations entre le sens intentionnel et le sens conventionnel d'une énonciation. Je formule, à l'aide d'une version modifiée de la définition de la notion de convention proposée par Lewis , une hypothèse concernant les conditions dans lesquelles on peut dire qu'une langue comprenant des expressions déictiques, des phrases ambiguës et des indicateurs de force illocutoire (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  14
    Note sur le puzzle de Kripke.Daniel Laurier - 1988 - Philosophiques 15 (1):31-39.
    Je soutiens que Kripke n'a pas réussi à montrer que certains principes plausibles gouvernant l'attribution de croyances, tels que les principes de décitation et de traduction, pouvaient nous conduire à attribuer des croyances de dicto contradictoires à un sujet réfléchi et linguistiquement compétent sans présupposer une théorie descriptive des noms propres ou des termes désignant des espèces naturelles. Les cas décrits par Kripke se réduisent à des variantes du problème de Quine concernant les croyances de re ou à des variantes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Rationality and Intentionality: A Defence of Optimization in Theories of Interpretation.Daniel Laurier - 1992 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 43:125-141.
    The view that in radical interpretation, the interpreter should aim at optimizing the rationality of agents is defended. A distinction and a parallel is drawn between linguistic interpretation and psychological interpretation. Both can be taken to be governed, in part, and in somewhat different ways, by a principle of rationality. Such approaches have been criticised on the ground that they make it impossible for a speaker or an agent to have wildly irrational or false beliefs. It is argued that the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. John R. Searle, Sens Et Expression: Études de Théorie des Actes de Langage Reviewed By.Daniel Laurier - 1983 - Philosophy in Review 3 (2):97-101.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  14
    Making "Reasons" Explicit: How Normative is Brandom's Inferentialism.Daniel Laurier - 2009 - Abstracta 5 (2):79-99.
    This paper asks whether Brandom (1994) has provided a sufficiently clear account of the basic normative concepts of commitment and entitlement, on which his normative inferentialism seems to rest, and of how they contribute to explain the inferential articulation of conceptual contents. I show that Brandom's claim that these concepts are analogous to the concepts of obligation and permission cannot be right, and argue that the normative character of the concept of commitment is dubious. This leads me to replace Brandom's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  29
    À la Défense du Déontologisme Doxastique.Daniel Laurier - 2009 - Dialogue 48 (1):37.
    ABSTRACT: I offer a refutation of the standard argument according to which we have no doxastic obligation because we do not have the kind of voluntary control over our beliefs required for having obligations. I then propose an interpretation of the distinction between epistemic and practical reasons for belief which can be generalised to other attitudes such as intention, and seems to imply that mental acts such as judgements and decisions never count as intentional actions, and that these two sorts (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  34
    Essential Dependence and Realism.Daniel Laurier - 2007 - Sorites 19:41-50.
    It has recently been suggested that realism about some subject matter is best construed as the claim that the facts pertaining to this subject matter are essentially independent from the mind, in a sense to be explained, and not as the admittedly weaker claim that they are modally independent from the mind. In this paper, I argue that this proposal is liable to trivialize the realist's position and is biased against his irrealist opponent.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  11
    Entre la rime et la raison. Précis de L'Esprit et la nature.Daniel Laurier - 2003 - Philosophiques 30 (2):407-410.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  27
    Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind George Lakoff Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1987. 614 P. 29, 95 $The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason Mark Johnson Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1987. 233 P. 27, 50 $. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (3):477-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  32
    Non-Conceptually Contentful Attitudes in Interpretation.Daniel Laurier - 2001 - Sorites 13 (October):6-22.
    Brandom's book Making It Explicit defends Davidson's claim that conceptual thought can arise only on the background of a practice of mutual interpretation, without endorsing the further view that one can be a thinker only if one has the concept of a concept. This involves giving an account of conceptual content in terms of what Brandom calls practical deontic attitudes. In this paper, I make a plea for the conclusion that these practical attitudes are best seen as intentional, but non-conceptually (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  10
    Les phénomènes mentaux ont-ils des effets physiques?Daniel Laurier - 1988 - Hermes 3:109.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  7
    Making „Reasons " Explicit. How Normative is Brandom's Inferentialism?Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 13 (1):127-145.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Between Phenomenalism and Objectivism: An Examination of R. Brandom’s Account of the Objectivity of Discursive Deontic Statuses.Daniel Laurier - 2005 - Journal of Philosophical Research 30:189-214.
    Brandom claims to have succeeded in showing how certain kinds of social practices can institute objective deontic statuses and confer objective conceptual contents on certain performances. This paper proposes a reconstruction of how, on Brandom’s views, this is supposed to come about, and a critical examination of the explicit arguments offered in support for this claim.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  22
    Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language: An Introduction Bjorn T. Ramberg Oxford, Blackwell, 1989, 153 P., 27,50$.Daniel Laurier - 1991 - Dialogue 30 (1-2):189-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  13
    Les Raisons Épistémiques Sont-Elles Instrumentales?Daniel Laurier - 2013 - Dialogue 52 (2):211-231.
    In a recent article (2011), Steglich-Petersen claims to be able to provide a teleological account of the nature of epistemic reasons which (i) avoids the standard objections to this kind of approach and (ii) is compatible with the evidentialist claim that epistemic reasons always trump non-epistemic reasons (assuming there are such reasons). I argue that his proposal is unable to do justice to the idea that epistemic reasons are constituted by the evidence, and more generally, that it is incoherent to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  10
    Sommes-nous tous des épiphénomènes ?Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Philosophiques 35 (1):119-125.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    Remarques sur la sémiotique.Daniel Laurier - 1984 - Philosophiques 11 (1):91-109.
    Je défends la classification carnapienne des disciplines sémiotiques en montrant qu'elle permet de caractériser adéquatement la nature de la pragmatique. J'indique, en particulier, comment une notion de système pragmatique pourrait être développée par analogie avec celles de système syntaxique et de système sémantique.I defend Carnap's classification of semiotic disciplines by showing that it leads to an adequate characterization of the nature of pragmatics. In particular, I indicate how a notion of pregmatic system could be constructed on the analogy with those (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  11
    François Latraverse, La pragmatique : histoire et critique, Bruxelles, Mardaga, 1987, 267 p.François Latraverse, La pragmatique : histoire et critique, Bruxelles, Mardaga, 1987, 267 p. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1989 - Philosophiques 16 (2):446-450.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  11
    Réponses À Mes Critiques.Daniel Laurier - 2003 - Philosophiques 30 (2):421-424.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    Luc Bégin et alii, Pragmatisme et pensée contemporaine. Cahiers de philosophie, no. 2, Département de philosophie, Université Sherbrooke, 1984, ix et 178 p. Luc Bégin et alii, Pragmatisme et pensée contemporaine. Cahiers de philosophie, no. 2, Département de philosophie, Université Sherbrooke, 1984, ix et 178 p. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1985 - Philosophiques 12 (1):232-236.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  7
    Mind-Dependence, Irrealism and Superassertibility.Daniel Laurier - 2008 - Philosophia Scientae 12:143-157.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    Les états intentionnels des créatures solitaires.Daniel Laurier - 1987 - Philosophiques 14 (2):229-359.
    Je soutiens qu'il y a deux façons d'individuer les états intentionnels de créatures qui sont dépourvues de toute compétence linguistique, à savoir par leur rôle propositionnel ou par leurs conditions de vérité, mais que cette distinction ne vaut que pour les états intentionnels singuliers. L'examine ensuite différentes façons de spécifier, tout en restant dans le cadre d'une conception représentationnaliste de l'intentionnalité, les conditions de vérité des attributions d'états intentionnels privés du langage ordinaire selon le mode d'individuation considéré. Il s'avère qu'une (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. L'analyse téléologique du contenu intentionnel: l'écueil du désir: l'écueil du désir.Daniel Laurier - 1998 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (4):624-659.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Francis Jacques, L'espace Logique de L'Interlocution: Dialogiques II Reviewed By.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (5):227-229.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  17
    Explaining Behavior: Reasons in a World of Causes Fred Dretske Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1988, Xi, 165 P.Daniel Laurier - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (3):629-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  12
    Consciousness William G. Lycan Collection «A Bradford Book» Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1987, Xvi, 165 P.Daniel Laurier - 1992 - Dialogue 31 (4):723-.
  46.  12
    La Logique: Une Introduction Michel J. Blais Montréal: Presses de l'Université de Montréal, 1985. 234 P.Daniel Laurier - 1986 - Dialogue 25 (2):385-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  13
    Representation and Reality Hilary Putnam Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1988, 136 P.Daniel Laurier - 1993 - Dialogue 32 (1):178-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  5
    Le programme de Davidson et les langues naturelles.Daniel Laurier - 1985 - Dialogue 24 (2):195-212.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  10
    Davidson Et la Philosophie du Langage Pascal Engel Collection «L'interrogation Philosophique» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1994, Xx, 357 P. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):402-.
  50.  12
    Naturaliser L'Intentionnalité. Essai de Philosophic de la Psychologie Élisabeth Pacherie Collection «Psychologie Et Sciences de la Pensée» Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1993, Xx, 300 P. [REVIEW]Daniel Laurier - 1996 - Dialogue 35 (2):406-.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 74