5 found
Order:
See also
Profile: David D. Auerbach (North Carolina State University)
  1. Intensionality and the Gödel Theorems.David D. Auerbach - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 48 (3):337--51.
    Philosophers of language have drawn on metamathematical results in varied ways. Extensionalist philosophers have been particularly impressed with two, not unrelated, facts: the existence, due to Frege/Tarski, of a certain sort of semantics, and the seeming absence of intensional contexts from mathematical discourse. The philosophical import of these facts is at best murky. Extensionalists will emphasize the success and clarity of the model theoretic semantics; others will emphasize the relative poverty of the mathematical idiom; still others will question the aptness (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  8
    Mathematical Knowledge.David D. Auerbach & Mark Steiner - 1977 - Philosophical Review 86 (2):247.
  3.  6
    Review: Michael Detlefsen, Hilbert's Program. An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. [REVIEW]David D. Auerbach - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):620-622.
  4.  2
    Gödel's Theorem in Focus, Edited by Shanker S. G., Philosophers in Focus Series, Croom Helm, London, New York, and Sydney, 1988, and Routledge, London and New York 1989, Ix + 261 Pp. [REVIEW]David D. Auerbach - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):365-366.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Detlefsen Michael, Hilbert's Program. An Essay on Mathematical Instrumentalism. Synthese Library, Vol. 182, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht Etc. 1986, Xiv + 186 Pp. [REVIEW]David D. Auerbach - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (2):620-622.