17 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Dolinko [17]David Howard Dolinko [1]
  1. Some Thoughts About Retributivism.David Dolinko - 1991 - Ethics 101 (3):537-559.
    Retributive accounts of the justification of criminal punishment are increasingly fashionable, yet their proponents frequently rely more on suggestive metaphor than on reasoned explanation. This article seeks to question whether any such coherent explanations are possible. I briefly sketch some general doubts about the validity of retributivist views and then critique three recent efforts (by George Sher, Jean Hampton, and Michael Moore) to put retributivism on a sound basis.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  2. Retributivism, Consequentialism, and the Intrinsic Goodness of Punishment.David Dolinko - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):507-528.
    Retributivism is commonly taken as an alternative to a consequentialist justification of punishment. It has recently been suggested, however, that retributivism can be recast as a consequentialist theory. This suggestion is shown to be untenable. The temptation to advance it is traced to an "intrinsic good" claim prominent in retributive thinking. This claim is examined, and is argued to be of little help in coping with the difficulties besetting the retributive theory, as well as clashing with a "desert" claim equally (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  21
    Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability.David Dolinko - 1991 - Ethics 102 (1):172-173.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  4.  68
    Review of “Crime and Culpability: A Theory of Criminal Law”. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (1):93-102.
    This is a review of the challenging book in which Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan propose sweeping revisions to the structure of substantive criminal law.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  60
    Mismeasuring “Unfair Advantage”: A Response to Michael Davis. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1994 - Law and Philosophy 13 (4):493 - 524.
    One prominent contemporary retributivist theory is built on the notion that crime yields an “unfair advantage” over law-abiding citizens which punishment removes or nullifies. Michael Davis has defended this theory by constructing a market model of “unfair advantage” that he contends answers critics' objections to the retributivist enterprise. I seek to demonstrate the inadequacy of Davis's approach, arguing in particular that the market model rests on an incoherent notion of “demand” and would not, even if coherent, link “unfair advantage” to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  6. Punishment.David Dolinko - 2011 - In John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law. Oxford University Press.
  7.  35
    Morris on Paternalism and Punishment.David Dolinko - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (4):345-361.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  27
    Book Review:Intention, Agency and Criminal Liability. R. A. Duff. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1991 - Ethics 102 (1):172-.
  9.  29
    Justice in the Age of Sentencing Guidelines.David Dolinko - 2000 - Ethics 110 (3):563-585.
  10.  3
    Morris on Paternalism and Punishment.David Dolinko - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (4):345-361.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  11
    Book Review:Punishment: Theory and Practice. Mark Tunick. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1992 - Ethics 104 (1):182-.
    Unlike other treatments of legal punishment, Punishment: Theory and Practice takes both an external approach, asking why we punish at all, and an internal approach, considering issues faced by those 'inside' the practice: For what actions should we punish? Should we allow plea-bargaining? the insanity defense? How should sentencing be determined? The two approaches are connected: To decide whether to punish someone who is 'insane', or who cops a plea, we need to ask whether doing so is consistent with our (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  22
    Reflections on the Grammar of Criminal Law.David Dolinko - 2008 - Criminal Justice Ethics 27 (1):83-90.
  13.  13
    The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of the Criminal Law.John Deigh & David Dolinko (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
    This is the first comprehensive handbook in the philosophy of criminal law. It contains seventeen original essays by leading thinkers in the field and covers the field's major topics including limits to criminalization, obscenity and hate speech, blackmail, the law of rape, attempts, accomplice liability, causation, responsibility, justification and excuse, duress, provocation and self-defense, insanity, punishment, the death penalty, mercy, and preventive detention and other alternatives to punishment. It will be an invaluable resource for scholars and students whose research and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  41
    Action Theory and Criminal Law. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (3):293-306.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  9
    Review: Action Theory and Criminal Law. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1996 - Law and Philosophy 15 (3):293 - 306.
  16. Review: [Untitled]. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1993 - Ethics 103:401-403.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  17.  24
    Liability and Responsibility: Essays in Law and Morals. [REVIEW]David Dolinko - 1993 - Ethics 103 (2):401-403.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark