12 found
Order:
  1.  52
    Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God.Amitai Shenhav, David G. Rand & Joshua D. Greene - 2012 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 141 (3):423.
  2. Human cooperation.David G. Rand & Martin A. Nowak - 2013 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 (8):413.
  3.  28
    Bayesian or biased? Analytic thinking and political belief updating.Ben M. Tappin, Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2020 - Cognition 204 (C):104375.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  4.  23
    Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing.Hause Lin, Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2023 - Cognition 230 (C):105312.
  5.  43
    Cyclical population dynamics of automatic versus controlled processing: An evolutionary pendulum.David G. Rand, Damon Tomlin, Adam Bear, Elliot A. Ludvig & Jonathan D. Cohen - 2017 - Psychological Review 124 (5):626-642.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  33
    Can Strategic Ignorance Explain the Evolution of Love?Adam Bear & David G. Rand - 2019 - Topics in Cognitive Science 11 (2):393-408.
    Why do people enter devoted relationships when they can continue looking for better partners? The “strategic ignorance” account holds that remaining ignorant about alternative partners is a signal that you are a high‐quality partner. Despite this intuition, the authors show that evolution favors a “look while allowing your partner to look” strategy, unless the costs of being rejected by a looking partner are extremely high. Thus, the origins of love must be found elsewhere.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  47
    When do we punish people who don’t?Justin W. Martin, Jillian J. Jordan, David G. Rand & Fiery Cushman - 2019 - Cognition 193 (C):104040.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  23
    The evolution of analytic thought?Gordon Pennycook & David G. Rand - 2017 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 40.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  29
    Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to help.Bence Bago, Leah R. Rosenzweig, Adam J. Berinsky & David G. Rand - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (6):1166-1180.
    Misinformation is a serious concern for societies across the globe. To design effective interventions to combat the belief in and spread of misinformation, we must understand which psychological processes influence susceptibility to misinformation. This paper tests the widely assumed – but largely untested – claim that emotionally provocative headlines are associated with worse ability to identify true versus false headlines. Consistent with this proposal, we found correlational evidence that overall emotional response at the headline level is associated with diminished truth (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  16
    Cultural evolution need not imply group selection.Dorsa Amir, Matthew R. Jordan & David G. Rand - 2016 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 39.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  35
    Retaliation and antisocial punishment are overlooked in many theoretical models as well as behavioral experiments.Anna Dreber & David G. Rand - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (1):24-24.
    Guala argues that there is a mismatch between most laboratory experiments on costly punishment and behavior in the field. In the lab, experimental designs typically suppress retaliation. The same is true for most theoretical models of the co-evolution of costly punishment and cooperation, which a priori exclude the possibility of defectors punishing cooperators.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  26
    Individual difference in acts of self-sacrifice.Michael N. Stagnaro, Rebecca Littman & David G. Rand - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41:e217.
    Whitehouse's model explains when people engage in self-sacrifice, but not who is most likely to do so. We propose incorporating individual differences, such as cognitive style (one's inclination toward intuition versus deliberation), and argue that individuals who rely on intuition may be more likely to (1) develop group identity fusion after an emotional experience and (2) engage in pro-social self-sacrifice.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark