49 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Kyle Johnson [27]David K. Johnson [18]David Kenneth Johnson [5]
See also
  1. Identifying the Conflict Between Religion and Science.David Kyle Johnson - 2020 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2 (1):122-148.
    Inspired by Stephen J. Gould’s NOMA thesis, it is commonly maintained among academic theists that religion and science are not in conflict. This essay will argue, by analogy, that science and religion undeniably are in conflict. It will begin by quickly defining religion and science and then present multiple examples that are unquestionable instances of unscientific reasoning and beliefs and show how they precisely parallel common mainstream orthodox religious reasoning and doctrines. It will then consider objections. In essence, this article (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2. The Relevance (and Irrelevance) of Questions of Personhood (and Mindedness) to the Abortion Debate.David Kyle Johnson - 2019 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 1 (2):121‒53.
    Disagreements about abortion are often assumed to reduce to disagreements about fetal personhood (and mindedness). If one believes a fetus is a person (or has a mind), then they are “pro-life.” If one believes a fetus is not a person (or is not minded), they are “pro-choice.” The issue, however, is much more complicated. Not only is it not dichotomous—most everyone believes that abortion is permissible in some circumstances (e.g. to save the mother’s life) and not others (e.g. at nine (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. God, Fatalism, and Temporal Ontology.David Kyle Johnson - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (4):435-454.
    Theological incompatibility arguments suggest God's comprehensive foreknowledge is incompatible with human free will. Logical incompatibility arguments suggest a complete set of truths about the future is logically incompatible with human free will. Of the two, most think theological incompatibility is the more severe problem; but hardly anyone thinks either kind of argument presents a real threat to free will. I will argue, however, that sound theological and logical incompatibility arguments exist and that, in fact, logical incompatibly is the more severe (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  83
    A Refutation of Skeptical Theism.David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - Sophia 52 (3):425-445.
    Skeptical theists argue that no seemingly unjustified evil (SUE) could ever lower the probability of God's existence at all. Why? Because God might have justifying reasons for allowing such evils (JuffREs) that are undetectable. However, skeptical theists are unclear regarding whether or not God's existence is relevant to the existence of JuffREs, and whether or not God's existence is relevant to their detectability. But I will argue that, no matter how the skeptical theist answers these questions, it is undeniable that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5.  59
    Natural Evil and the Simulation Hypothesis.David Kyle Johnson - 2011 - Philo 14 (2):161-175.
    Some theists maintain that they need not answer the threat posed to theistic belief by natural evil; they have reason enough to believe that God exists and it renders impotent any threat that natural evil poses to theism. Explicating how God and natural evil coexist is not necessary since they already know both exist. I will argue that, even granting theists the knowledge they claim, this does not leave them in an agreeable position. It commits the theist to a very (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6. Do Souls Exist?David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - Think 12 (35):61-75.
    ‘The soul hypothesis’ enjoys near unanimous support in the general population. Among philosophers and scientists, however, belief in the soul is far less common. The purpose of this essay to explain why many philosophers and scientists reject the soul hypothesis and to consider what the non-existence of the soul would entail.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  58
    The Failure of the Multiverse Hypothesis as a Solution to the Problem of No Best World.David Kyle Johnson - 2014 - Sophia 53 (4):447-465.
    The multiverse hypothesis is growing in popularity among theistic philosophers because some view it as the preferable way to solve certain difficulties presented by theistic belief. In this paper, I am concerned specifically with its application to Rowe’s problem of no best world, which suggests that God’s existence is impossible given the fact that the world God actualizes must be unsurpassable, yet for any given possible world, there is one greater. I will argue that, as a solution to the problem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  48
    The Failure of Plantinga’s Solution to the Logical Problem of Natural Evil.David Kyle Johnson - 2012 - Philo 15 (2):145-157.
  9. Black Mirror and Philosophy.William Irwin & David Kyle Johnson (eds.) - 2020
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Heroes and Philosophy: Buy the Book, Save the World.William Irwin & David K. Johnson (eds.) - 2009 - Wiley.
    _The first unauthorized look at the philosophy behind _Heroes_, one of TV's most popular shows_ When ordinary individuals from around the world inexplicably develop superhuman abilities, they question who they are, struggle to cope with new responsibilities, and decide whether to use their new power for good or for evil. Every episode of Tim Kring's hit TV show _Heroes_ is a philosophical quandary. _Heroes and Philosophy_ is the first book to analyze how philosophy makes this show so compelling. It lets (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  39
    Introducing Philosophy Through Pop Culture: From Socrates to South Park, Hume to House.William Irwin & David Kyle Johnson (eds.) - 2010 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    What can _South Park_ tell us about Socrates and the nature of evil? How does _The Office_ help us to understand Sartre and existentialist ethics? Can _Battlestar Galactica_ shed light on the existence of God? _Introducing Philosophy Through Pop Culture_ uses popular culture to illustrate important philosophical concepts and the work of the major philosophers With examples from film, television, and music including _South Park_, _The Matrix_, _X-Men_, _Batman_, _Harry Potter, Metallica_ and _Lost,_ even the most abstract and complex philosophical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  15
    What Would Dutton Say About the Paradox of Fiction?William Irwin & David Kyle Johnson - 2014 - Philosophy and Literature 38 (1A):A144-A147.
  13.  16
    A Pragmatic Realist Foundation for Critical Thinking.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 7 (3):23-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  45
    All Praise the Fonz.David Kyle Johnson - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 39 (39):83-86.
    This exploration of the Family Guy character Francis Griffin (Peter's father) reveals the pitfalls of his evangelical mindset, and the epistemic shortcomings of evangelical epistemology. Scripture, Historical Tradition, and religious Experience (SHiTE) can't justify religious belief.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  39
    All Praise the Fonz.David Kyle Johnson - 2007 - The Philosophers' Magazine 39:83-86.
    This exploration of the Family Guy character Francis Griffin (Peter's father) reveals the pitfalls of his evangelical mindset, and the epistemic shortcomings of evangelical epistemology. Scripture, Historical Tradition, and religious Experience (SHiTE) can't justify religious belief.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  42
    Are Science and Religion Compatible?David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:44-50.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  90
    Are Science and Religion Compatible?David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - The Philosophers' Magazine 63:44-50.
    The South Park “Go God Go” saga raises some very important questions. In these episodes, the scientific worldview stamps out religion. But are science and religion really in such irreconcilable conflict? Would the supremacy of a scientific worldview really lead to atheism? And in the South Park future of 2546, a cartoon version of Richard Dawkins has pioneered efforts which culminate in religion’s demise and atheism becomes its own religion. But is atheism—and specifically “The New Atheism” that Dawkins champions—really just (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  56
    “A Story That is Told Again, and Again, and Again”: Recurrence, Providence, and Freedom.David Kyle Johnson - 2008 - In Jason T. Eberl (ed.), Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy: Knowledge Here Begins Out There. Wiley-Blackwell.
    An exploration of the freedom foreknowledge problem using (New) Battlestar Galactica.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Attacking with the North : Affirmative Action and The Office (US).David Kyle Johnson - 2008 - In Jeremy Wisnewski (ed.), The Office and Philosophy: Scenes From the Unexamined Life. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  17
    Cartmanland and the Problem of Evil.David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy: Respect My Philosophah! Wiley-Blackwell.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  8
    Confessions of a Sentimental Philosopher: Science, Animal Rights, and the Demands of Rational Inquiry.David K. Johnson - 1994 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):76-83.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  12
    Confessions of a Sentimental Philosopher.David K. Johnson - 1994 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1):76-83.
  23.  38
    Critical Thinking and the Argumentative Essay.David K. Johnson & Matthew R. Silliman - 1998 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 17 (4):40-43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  67
    Does Free Will Exist?David Kyle Johnson - 2016 - Think 15 (42):53-70.
    In, I suggested that, while the non-existence of the soul does threaten free will, the threat it possess is inconsequential. Free will faces so many other hurdles that, if those were overcome, the soul's non-existence would be a non-threat. In this paper, I establish this; and to do so, I define the common libertarian notion of free will, and show how neuroscience, determinism, indeterminism, theological belief, axioms in logic, and even Einstein's theory of relativity each entail that libertarian free will (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  50
    Divine Omniscience and the Fatalist Dilemma.David Kyle Johnson - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (4):435–54.
    Arguments against our free will pose a serious problem. Although there are not very many philosophers who call themselves fatalists, quite a few are convinced that fatalism follows from common assumptions. Assuming that most believe themselves to be free, identifying ways to avoid the conclusion of such fatalist arguments is quite an important task. I begin by dealing specifically with theological fatalism. I present many versions of theological fatalism, but come to the conclusion that only one version constitutes a genuine (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  16
    Josefsberg, From Page 17.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (4):27-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  45
    Endnotes for Johnson, From Page 8.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (4):27-27.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  18
    Hypothesis and Realism.David K. Johnson - 1995 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 15 (1):80-85.
  29.  14
    Hypothesis and Realism: A Comment on Sutton.David K. Johnson - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 15 (1):80-85.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  17
    Inception and Philosophy: Because It's Never Just a Dream.David Kyle Johnson & William Irwin (eds.) - 2011 - Wiley.
  31.  4
    Intuition, Hypothesis, and Reality.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
    Realism about the external, natural world is an overarching empirical hypothesis. The method of hypothetical realism rejects as an excessive concession to the skeptic these two assumptions of constructivist intuitionism: first, that everything real must be exhaustively inspectable; and second, that our beliefs are to be justified to the point of certainty. We prefer to say that nothing is ever known directly; that all of our contact with the world is mediated by thoughts, words, and percepts construed as signs having (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Introducing Philosophy Through Pop Culture.David Kyle Johnson & William Irwin (eds.) - 2010 - Wiley.
    What can South Park tell us about Socrates and the nature of evil? How does The Office help us to understand Sartre and existentialist ethics? Can Battlestar Galactica shed light on the existence of God? Introducing Philosophy Through Pop Culture uses popular culture to illustrate important philosophical concepts and the work of the major philosophers With examples from film, television, and music including South Park, The Matrix, X-Men, Batman, Harry Potter, Metallica and Lost, even the most abstract and complex philosophical (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  22
    Language, Thought, and World.David K. Johnson - 1993 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 11 (1):3-5.
  34.  30
    Retiring the Argument From Reason.David Kyle Johnson - 2018 - Philosophia Christi 20 (2):541-563.
    In C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, I took the con in a debate with Victor Reppert about the soundness of Lewis’s famous “argument from reason.” Reppert then extended his argument in an article for Philosophia Christi; this article is my reply. I show that Reppert’s argument fails for three reasons. It “loads the die” by falsely assuming that naturalism, by definition, can't include mental causation "on the basic level.". Physical processes can reliably produce true beliefs. And reasoning (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  7
    Science, Religion, South Park, and God.David Kyle Johnson - 2013 - In Robert Arp & Kevin S. Decker (eds.), The Ultimate South Park and Philosophy: Respect My Philosophah! Wiley-Blackwell.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  13
    The Final Conceit.David K. Johnson - 1992 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 9 (4):8-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  20
    The Illusions of Our Epoch.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (4):6-8.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  8
    The Illusions of Our Epoch: Postmodern Discourse and Epistemological Robinsonades.David K. Johnson - 1991 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 8 (4):6-8.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government.David K. Johnson - 2004
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  40.  31
    The Ought-Is Question: Discovering The Modern in Post-Modernism.David K. Johnson - 1995 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (4):74-79.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. The Obscene Watermark : Corporate Responsibility at Dunder-Mifflin (US).David Kyle Johnson - 2008 - In Jeremy Wisnewski (ed.), The Office and Philosophy: Scenes From the Unexamined Life. Blackwell.
  42.  11
    Why Religious Experience Cannot Justify Religious Belief.David Kyle Johnson - 2020 - Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry 2 (2):26-46.
    Theists often claim that neither the diversity of religious experience nor natural explanations for religious experience can threaten the ability of religious experience to justify religious belief. Contrarily, this paper argues that not only do they pose such a threat, but religious experience and natural explanations for them completely undermine the epistemic justificatory power of religious experience. To establish this, the author first defines the supposed role of religious experience in justifying religious belief. Then the author shows how the diversity (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  40
    Critical Thinking, Autonomy, and Social Justice.Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:127-138.
    In a fictional conversation designed to appeal to both working teachers and social philosophers, three educators take up the question of whether critical thinking itself can, or should, be taught independently of an explicit consideration of issues related to social justice. One, a thoughtful but somewhat traditional Enlightenment rationalist, sees critical thinking as a neutral set of skills and dispositions, essentially unrelated to the conclusions of morality, problems of social organization, or the content of any particular academic discipline. A second (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  6
    Critical Thinking, Autonomy, and Social Justice.Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson - 2011 - Social Philosophy Today 27:127-138.
    In a fictional conversation designed to appeal to both working teachers and social philosophers, three educators take up the question of whether critical thinking itself can, or should, be taught independently of an explicit consideration of issues related to social justice. One, a thoughtful but somewhat traditional Enlightenment rationalist, sees critical thinking as a neutral set of skills and dispositions, essentially unrelated to the conclusions of morality, problems of social organization, or the content of any particular academic discipline. A second (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  46
    The Anti-Theorist’s Paradox.Matthew R. Silliman & David K. Johnson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:199-208.
  46.  22
    The Anti-Theorist’s Paradox: Dialogue with a Rortian.Matthew R. Silliman & David K. Johnson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 15:199-208.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  47
    Tortured Ethics.Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:211-222.
    This dialogue discusses a proposal for the legalization of torture under specific circumstances and contrasts it with arguments for a total ban on torture. We consider three types of objection: first, that the difficulty of having adequate knowledge renders the stock “ticking bomb” scenario such a low-probability hypothetical as to present no realistic threat to a policy banning all torture; second, that empirically the information gleaned from torture is so unlikely to be reliable that it could not justify the moral (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  14
    Tortured Ethics.Matthew R. Silliman & David Kenneth Johnson - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:211-222.
    This dialogue discusses a proposal for the legalization of torture under specific circumstances and contrasts it with arguments for a total ban on torture. We consider three types of objection: first, that the difficulty of having adequate knowledge renders the stock “ticking bomb” scenario such a low-probability hypothetical as to present no realistic threat to a policy banning all torture; second, that empirically the information gleaned from torture is so unlikely to be reliable that it could not justify the moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  72
    A Debate Between a Theist and a Santa Clausist.Ruth Tallman & David Kyle Johnson - 2015 - Think 14 (40):27-41.
    Many claim that belief in God is like belief in Santa Claus have it out belief in God, or belief in Santa – is rational, and a direct parallel between the reasoning of the two sides is demonstrated. Many important arguments regarding theistic belief are discussed in some form. The article is intended for use in an introduction to philosophy, or an introductory philosophy of religion course, as a humorous way to foster discussion and expose students to criticisms of theistic (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark