10 found
Order:
  1. Norm Conflicts and Conditionals.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2019 - Psychological Review (5):611-633.
    Suppose that two competing norms, N1 and N2, can be identified such that a given person’s response can be interpreted as correct according to N1 but incorrect according to N2. Which of these two norms, if any, should one use to interpret such a response? In this paper we seek to address this fundamental problem by studying individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their case judgments and reflective attitudes. To investigate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2. Relevance Differently Affects the Truth, Acceptability, and Probability Evaluations of “and”, “but”, “Therefore”, and “If–Then”.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Hannes Krahl & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Thinking and Reasoning 23 (4):449-482.
    In this study we investigate the influence of reason-relation readings of indicative conditionals and ‘and’/‘but’/‘therefore’ sentences on various cognitive assessments. According to the Frege-Grice tradition, a dissociation is expected. Specifically, differences in the reason-relation reading of these sentences should affect participants’ evaluations of their acceptability but not of their truth value. In two experiments we tested this assumption by introducing a relevance manipulation into the truth-table task as well as in other tasks assessing the participants’ acceptability and probability evaluations. Across (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3.  9
    Assessing the Belief Bias Effect with ROCs: Reply to Dube, Rotello, and Heit.Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2011 - Psychological Review 118 (1):164-173.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  4.  15
    Is Preregistration Worthwhile?Aba Szollosi, David Kellen, Danielle J. Navarro, Richard Shiffrin, Iris van Rooij, Trisha Van Zandt & Chris Donkin - forthcoming - Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  6
    How (in)Variant Are Subjective Representations of Described and Experienced Risk and Rewards?David Kellen, Thorsten Pachur & Ralph Hertwig - 2016 - Cognition 157:126-138.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  6.  10
    On the Measurement of Criterion Noise in Signal Detection Theory: The Case of Recognition Memory.David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (3):457-479.
  7.  9
    Signal Detection and Threshold Modeling of Confidence-Rating ROCs: A Critical Test with Minimal Assumptions.David Kellen & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2015 - Psychological Review 122 (3):542-557.
  8.  12
    On the Measurement of Criterion Noise in Signal Detection Theory: Reply to Benjamin.David Kellen, Karl Christoph Klauer & Henrik Singmann - 2013 - Psychological Review 120 (3):727-730.
  9.  3
    The Law of Categorical Judgment Extended: A Note on Rosner and Kochanski.Karl Christoph Klauer & David Kellen - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (1):216-220.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Conditionals, Individual Variation, and the Scorekeeping Task.Niels Skovgaard-Olsen, David Kellen, Ulrike Hahn & Karl Christoph Klauer - 2017 - Proceedings of Cognitive Science 39:xxx.
    In this manuscript we study individual variation in the interpretation of conditionals by establishing individual profiles of the participants based on their behavioral responses and reflective attitudes. To investigate the participants’ reflective attitudes we introduce a new experimental paradigm called the Scorekeeping Task, and a Bayesian mixture model tailored to analyze the data. The goal is thereby to identify the participants who follow the Suppositional Theory of conditionals and Inferentialism and to investigate their performance on the uncertain and-to-if inference task.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark