89 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David Magnus [79]David Christopher Magnus [8]David C. Magnus [7]
  1.  82
    Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  2.  57
    Digital Contact Tracing, Privacy, and Public Health.Nicole Martinez-Martin, Sarah Wieten, David Magnus & Mildred K. Cho - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):43-46.
    Digital contact tracing, in combination with widespread testing, has been a focal point for many plans to “reopen” economies while containing the spread of Covid‐19. Most digital contact tracing projects in the United States and Europe have prioritized privacy protections in the form of local storage of data on smartphones and the deidentification of information. However, in the prioritization of privacy in this narrow form, there is not sufficient attention given to weighing ethical trade‐offs within the context of a public (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  3.  33
    Neither Ethical nor Prudent: Why Not to Choose Normothermic Regional Perfusion.Adam Omelianchuk, Alexander Morgan Capron, Lainie Friedman Ross, Arthur R. Derse, James L. Bernat & David Magnus - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (4):14-23.
    In transplant medicine, the use of normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory determination of death raises ethical difficulties. NRP is objectionable because it restores the donor's circulation, thus invalidating a death declaration based on the permanent cessation of circulation. NRP's defenders respond with arguments that are tortuous and factually inaccurate and depend on introducing extraneous concepts into the law. However, results comparable to NRP's—more and higher‐quality organs and more efficient allocation—can be achieved by removing organs from deceased donors (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  69
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  5.  47
    A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule.David Magnus - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):36-38.
    Discussion of the “dead donor rule” is challenging because it implicates views about a wide range of issues, including whether and when patients are appropriately declared dead, the validity of the doctrine of double effect, and the moral difference between or equivalence of active euthanasia and withdrawal of life‐sustaining treatment. The DDR will be defined here as the prohibition against removal of organs necessary for the life of the patient—that is, the prohibition of intentionally ending the life of a patient (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  6.  29
    Qatar’s Bioethics Meeting.David Magnus - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (4):1-3.
    What is the purpose of a large academic meeting attended by hundreds or thousands of participants? What are the reasons, given current virtual conferencing technology, to hold such meetings in pers...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  45
    We Convey More Than We (Literally) Say.Jason N. Batten, Bonnie O. Wong, William F. Hanks & David Magnus - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  8.  37
    (4 other versions)Editors’ Statement on the Responsible Use of Generative AI Technologies in Scholarly Journal Publishing.Gregory E. Kaebnick, David Christopher Magnus, Audiey Kao, Mohammad Hosseini, David Resnik, Veljko Dubljević, Christy Rentmeester, Bert Gordijn & Mark J. Cherry - 2023 - Hastings Center Report 53 (5):3-6.
    Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform many aspects of scholarly publishing. Authors, peer reviewers, and editors might use AI in a variety of ways, and those uses might augment their existing work or might instead be intended to replace it. We are editors of bioethics and humanities journals who have been contemplating the implications of this ongoing transformation. We believe that generative AI may pose a threat to the goals that animate our work but could also be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  32
    (1 other version)Editors' statement on the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in scholarly journal publishing.Gregory E. Kaebnick, David Christopher Magnus, Audiey Kao, Mohammad Hosseini, David Resnik, Veljko Dubljević, Christy Rentmeester & Bert Gordijn - 2023 - Bioethics 37 (9):825-828.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  40
    Informed Consent: A Matter of Aspiration Since 1966.Sarah Wieten, Jacob Blythe & David Magnus - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (5):3-5.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  47
    Clinical Ethics Consultation: A Need for Evidence.David Magnus - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):1-2.
  12.  20
    The Limits of Individualism: Potential Societal Harms from the EAP for Convalescent Plasma.David Magnus - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (9):1-3.
    Volume 20, Issue 9, September 2020, Page 1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  13.  25
    Treatability Statements in Serious Illness: The Gap Between What is Said and What is Heard.Jason N. Batten, Bonnie O. Wong, William F. Hanks & David C. Magnus - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):394-404.
    :Empirical work has shown that patients and physicians have markedly divergent understandings of treatability statements in the context of serious illness. Patients often understand treatability statements as conveying good news for prognosis and quality of life. In contrast, physicians often do not intend treatability statements to convey improvement in prognosis or quality of life, but merely that a treatment is available. Similarly, patients often understand treatability statements as conveying encouragement to hope and pursue further treatment, though this may not be (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  41
    Citizen Science and Gamification.Karola V. Kreitmair & David C. Magnus - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (2):40-46.
    According to the mainstream conception of research involving human participants, researchers have been trained scientists acting within institutions and have been the individuals doing the studying, while participants, who are nonscientist members of the public, have been the individuals being studied. The relationship between the public and scientists is evolving, however, giving rise to several new concepts, including crowdsourcing and citizen science. In addition, the practice of gamification has been applied to research protocols. The role of gamified, crowdsourced citizen scientist (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15.  23
    The Proper Locus of Professionalization: The Individual or the Institutions?David Magnus & Bela Fishbeyn - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5):1-2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  16.  65
    Translating Stem Cell Research: Challenges at the Research Frontier.David Magnus - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (2):267-276.
    There are many kinds of clinical trials. The regulatory framework within which most drug development takes place appears to be the one that is to be applied to the development of novel stem cell-based clinical trials. In the standard drug development model, appropriate pre-clinical research is conducted, and investigators or research sponsors submit an investigational new drug application to the Food and Drug Administration.If approved, typical clinical trials start with Phase I, which is usually a trial to determine the maximum (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17.  46
    Allocation of Opportunities to Participate in Clinical Trials during the Covid‐19 Pandemic and Other Public Health Emergencies.Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Holly Fernandez Lynch, Barbara E. Bierer, Luke Gelinas, Sara Chandros Hull, David Magnus, Michelle N. Meyer, Richard R. Sharp, Jeremy Sugarman, Benjamin S. Wilfond, Ruqaiijah Yearby & Seema Mohapatra - 2021 - Hastings Center Report 52 (1):51-58.
    Hastings Center Report, Volume 52, Issue 1, Page 51-58, January/February 2022.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  53
    Adrift in the gray zone: IRB perspectives on research in the learning health system.Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Maureen Kelley, Mildred K. Cho, Stephanie Alessi Kraft, Cyan James, Melissa Constantine, Adrienne N. Meyer, Douglas Diekema, Alexander M. Capron, Benjamin S. Wilfond & David Magnus - 2016 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 7 (2):125-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  19.  23
    Disability, Aging, and the Importance of Recognizing Social Supports in Medical Decision Making.David C. Magnus & Kevin T. Mintz - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (11):1-3.
    The two target articles in this issue draw an important connection between disability bioethics and geriatric bioethics. Dominic JC Wilkinson makes a pragmatic case for using frailty as a fa...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  26
    More than Conveying Information: Informed Consent as Speech Act.David C. Magnus, Jacob A. Blythe, Jason N. Batten & Bonnie O. Wong - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (5):1-3.
    In their target article, Millum and Bromwich situate their article against a backdrop of well-documented empirical research demonstrating that many participants have variable and often poor...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  24
    Suicide and the Sufficiency of Surrogate Decision Makers.Hywote Taye & David Magnus - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (3):1 - 2.
  22.  57
    Theory, practice, and epistemology in the development of species concepts.David Magnus - 1996 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (4):521-545.
  23.  29
    Response to Commentaries: When “Everyday Language” Contributes to Miscommunication in Serious Illness.Jason N. Batten, Bonnie O. Wong & David C. Magnus - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):433-438.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. Are Genes Us?Carl Cranor & David Magnus - 1996 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 18 (3):363.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25.  17
    Compassion and Research in Compassionate Use.David Magnus - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (11):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  26
    The meaning of graduate education for bioethics.David Magnus - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):10 – 12.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  27.  53
    The Importance of Understanding Language in Large Language Models.Alaa Youssef, Samantha Stein, Justin Clapp & David Magnus - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (10):6-7.
    Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have ushered in a transformative phase in artificial intelligence (AI). Unlike conventional AI, LLMs excel in facilitating fluid human–computer d...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  44
    Managing Expectations: Delivering the Worst News in the Best Way?David Magnus & Alyssa M. Burgart - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  46
    A Commentary on Oocyte Donation for Stem Cell Research in South Korea.David Magnus & Mildred K. Cho - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):W23-W24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30.  46
    Building a Trustworthy Precision Health Research Enterprise.David Magnus & Jason N. Batten - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (4):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  13
    Resuscitating the Dead: NRP and Language.David Magnus - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (6):1-3.
    This issue covers a topic widely being discussed at Ethics Committee meetings around the country, namely the line between life and death in organ procurement. While the debate over whether and when...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  47
    Can the Dead Donor Rule be Resuscitated?Simone Lucia Vernez & David Magnus - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (8):1-1.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 8, Page 1, August 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  30
    New life forms: new threats, new possibilities.Arthur L. Caplan & David Magnus - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (6).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34. Biology & epistemology.David Magnus, Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein - 1999 - In Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  35.  23
    Down the Primrose Path.David Magnus - 1999 - In Richard Creath & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Biology and epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 91.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36.  85
    The concept of genetic disease.David Magnus - 2004 - In Arthur L. Caplan, James J. McCartney & Dominic A. Sisti (eds.), Health, Disease, and Illness: Concepts in Medicine. Georgetown University Press. pp. 233--42.
  37.  5
    Adam Omelianchuk, Alexander Morgan Capron, Lainie Friedman Ross, Arthur R. Derse, James L. Bernat, and David Magnus reply.Adam Omelianchuk, Alexander Morgan Capron, Lainie Friedman Ross, Arthur R. Derse, James L. Bernat & David Magnus - 2024 - Hastings Center Report 54 (5):37-38.
    This letter responds to letters by Garson Leder and by Harrison Lee in the same issue, September‐October 2024, of the Hastings Center Report.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  71
    Genomic Contraindications for Heart Transplantation.Danton S. Char, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, Aliessa Barnes, David Magnus, Michael J. Deem & John D. Lantos - 2017 - Pediatrics 139 (4).
  39.  32
    Justice and Bioethics: Who Should Finance Academic Publishing?Udo Schuklenk & David Magnus - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (10):1-2.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  28
    Professional Judgment and Justice: Equal Respect for the Professional Judgment of Critical-Care Physicians.David Magnus & Norm Rizk - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (1):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  41.  78
    Federalism and bioethics: States and moral pluralism.James W. Fossett, Alicia R. Ouellette, Sean Philpott, David Magnus & Glenn McGee - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (6):24-35.
    Bioethicists are often interested mostly in national standards and institutions, but state governments have historically overseen a wide range of bioethical issues and share responsibility with the federal government for still others. States ought to have an important role. By allowing for multiple outcomes, the American federal system allows a better fit between public opinion and public policies.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  56
    States and Moral Pluralism.James W. Fossett, Alicia R. Ouellette, Sean Philpott, David Magnus & Glenn McGee - 2007 - Hastings Center Report 37 (6):24.
    Bioethicists are often interested mostly in national standards and institutions, but state governments have historically overseen a wide range of bioethical issues and share responsibility with the federal government for still others. States ought to have an important role. By allowing for multiple outcomes, the American federal system allows a better fit between public opinion and public policies.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  39
    A new era for AJOB.David Magnus, Paul Root Wolpe, Kelly Carroll & Glenn McGee - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):x – xi.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  44. In Defense of Natural History: David Starr Jordan and the Role of Isolation in Evolution.David Christopher Magnus - 1993 - Dissertation, Stanford University
    Philosophers and historians of science have tended to denigrate the status and usefulness of the practice of natural history. The development of biology in this century is seen as the replacement of an older, descriptive and speculative method with a quantitative, experimental and well-founded science. This account embodies a philosophical view about the nature of science, which deems certain kinds of evidence and certain ways of producing knowledge appropriate. Natural history is seen as inadequate, providing insufficient support for establishing theory. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  66
    Evolution without change in Gene frequencies.David Magnus - 1998 - Biology and Philosophy 13 (2):255-261.
    Biologists often define evolution as a change in allele frequencies. Consideration of the evolution of the pocket mouse will show that it is possible to have evolution without any change in the allele frequencies in a population (through change in the genotype frequencies). The implications of this for genic selectionism are then discussed. Sober and Lewontin (1982) have constructed an example to demonstrate the blindness of genic selectionism in certain cases. Sterelny and Kitcher (1988) offer a defense against these arguments (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  46.  22
    Gerald S. Witherspoon was first ad.David Magnus & Glenn McGee - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  3
    The Future of Bioethics: Striving for a More Diverse and Inclusive Bioethics.Keisha Ray, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Kayhan Parsi & David Magnus - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (9):1-2.
    In light of this empirical study of who bioethicists are and what their values are and then answering the question “What is the future of bioethics?,” we think it’s important to place this question...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  49
    Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research.Lauren C. Milner & David Magnus - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):1 - 2.
    (2013). Can Informed Consent Go Too Far? Balancing Consent and Public Benefit in Research. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.778645.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49. The J. H. B. Bookshelf.Jonathan Harwood, M. Susan Lindee, David Magnus, Angela Creager, Mark V. Barrow Jr & Myles W. Jackson - 1995 - Journal of the History of Biology 28 (1):167-179.
  50.  25
    A Rejection of “Applied Ethics”: Philosophy’s Real Contributions to Bioethics Found Elsewhere.Ryan Marshall Felder & David Magnus - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (12):1-2.
    This month’s Target Article by Blumenthal-Barby et al. (2022) offers a defense of the importance of philosophy to bioethics. The authors cite the crucial role of philosophers in the development and...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 89