20 found
Order:
Disambiguations
David A. Pizarro [13]David Pizarro [10]
  1.  56
    The Mismeasure of Morals: Antisocial Personality Traits Predict Utilitarian Responses to Moral Dilemmas.Daniel M. Bartels & David A. Pizarro - 2011 - Cognition 121 (1):154-161.
  2.  40
    Conservatives Are More Easily Disgusted Than Liberals.Yoel Inbar, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (4):714-725.
    The uniquely human emotion of disgust is intimately connected to morality in many, perhaps all, cultures. We report two studies suggesting that a predisposition to feel disgust is associated with more conservative political attitudes, especially for issues related to the moral dimension of purity. In the first study, we document a positive correlation between disgust sensitivity and self-reported conservatism in a broad sample of US adults. In Study 2 we show that while disgust sensitivity is associated with more conservative attitudes (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  3.  35
    The Intelligence of the Moral Intuitions: A Comment on Haidt.David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2003 - Psychological Review 110 (1):193-196.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   63 citations  
  4. Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays.Yoel Inbar, David A. Pizarro, Joshua Knobe & Paul Bloom - 2009 - Emotion 9 (3): 435– 43.
    Two studies demonstrate that a dispositional proneness to disgust (“disgust sensitivity”) is associated with intuitive disapproval of gay people. Study 1 was based on previous research showing that people are more likely to describe a behavior as intentional when they see it as morally wrong (see Knobe, 2006, for a review). As predicted, the more disgust sensitive participants were, the more likely they were to describe an agent whose behavior had the side effect of causing gay men to kiss in (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  5.  9
    Inference of Trustworthiness From Intuitive Moral Judgments.Jim A. C. Everett, David A. Pizarro & M. J. Crockett - 2016 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (6):772-787.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  6.  67
    On Disgust and Moral Judgment.David Pizarro, Yoel Inbar & Chelsea Helion - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):267-268.
    Despite the wealth of recent work implicating disgust as an emotion central to human morality, the nature of the causal relationship between disgust and moral judgment remains unclear. We distinguish between three related claims regarding this relationship, and argue that the most interesting claim (that disgust is a moralizing emotion) is the one with the least empirical support.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  7. Nothing More Than Feelings? The Role of Emotions in Moral Judgment.David Pizarro - 2000 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (4):355–375.
    In this paper, I review the primary arguments for the traditional position that holds emotions as antagonistic to moral judgments. I argue that this position is untenable given the information about emotions and emotional processes that has emerged in the psychological literature of recent years. I then offer a theoret- ical model of emotive moral judgment that takes a closer look at how emotions, specifically empathy, play an integral role in the process of moral judgment. I argue that emotions should (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  8.  9
    A Theory of Moral Praise.Rajen A. Anderson, Molly J. Crockett & David A. Pizarro - 2020 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 24 (9):694-703.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  70
    Do Normative Standards Advance Our Understanding of Moral Judgment?David A. Pizarro & Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):558-559.
    Sunstein's review of research on moral heuristics is rich and informative – even without his central claim that individuals often commit moral errors. We question the value of positing such a normative moral framework for the study of moral judgment. We also propose an alternative standard for evaluating moral judgments – that of subjective rationality.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  10. Benefiting From Misfortune: When Harmless Actions Are Judged to Be Morally Blameworthy.David Pizarro - unknown
    Dominant theories of moral blame require an individual to have caused or intended harm. However, across four studies we demonstrate cases where no harm is caused or intended, yet individuals are nonetheless deemed worthy of blame. Specifically, individuals are judged to be blameworthy when they engage in actions that enable them to benefit from another’s misfortune (for example, betting that a company’s stock will decline or that a natural disaster will occur). We present evidence suggesting that perceptions of the actor’s (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  11.  26
    Varieties of Social Cognition.Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3):293-322.
    Recent work within psychology demonstrates that unconscious cognition plays a central role in the judgments and actions of individuals. We distinguish between two basic types unconscious social cognition: unconsciousness of the influences on judgments and actions, and unconscious of the mental states that give rise to judgments and actions. Influence unconsciousness is corroborated by strong empirical evidence, but unconscious states are difficult to verify. We discuss procedures aimed at providing conclusive evidence of state unconsciousness, and apply them to recent empirical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  12. College Students Implicitly Judge Interracial Sex and Gay Sex to Be Morally Wrong.Joshua Knobe, Paul Bloom & David Pizarro - manuscript
    College students implicitly judge interracial sex and gay sex to be morally wrong Some moral intuitions arise from psychological processes that are not fully accessible to consciousness. For instance, most people disapprove of consensual adult incest between siblings, but are unable to articulate why—they just feel that it is wrong (Haidt, 2001). More generally, there is evidence for at least two sources of moral judgment: explicit conscious reasoning and tacit intuitions, which are motivated by emotional responses (Greene et al., 2001) (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13.  7
    7 Stubborn Moralism and Freedom Ofthe Will.David A. Pizarro & Erik G. Helzer - 2010 - In Roy F. Baumeister, Alfred R. Mele & Kathleen D. Vohs (eds.), Free Will and Consciousness: How Might They Work? University Press. pp. 101.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  14.  22
    Disgust, Politics, and Responses to Threat.Yoel Inbar & David Pizarro - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (3):315-316.
  15.  80
    Enrique Bernárdez: El lenguaje como cultura. Madrid, Alianza, 2008.Bárbara Jiménez, Jone Mendizabal, Mertxe Izaguirre, Jaime Otavo, David Pizarro, Davi Moreno, Jesús Villaro, Andoni Olariaga, Enrique Navarro & Antonio Casado - 2012 - Dilemata 8:201-208.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  2
    Differentiating Between Different Forms of Moral Obligations.Rajen A. Anderson, Benjamin C. Ruisch & David A. Pizarro - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    We argue that Tomasello's account overlooks important psychological distinctions between how humans judge different types of moral obligations, such as prescriptive obligations and proscriptive obligations. Specifically, evaluating these different types of obligations rests on different psychological inputs and has distinct downstream consequences for judgments of moral character.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  5
    Asymmetric Memory for Harming Versus Being Harmed.Chelsea Helion, Erik G. Helzer, Suzie Kim & David A. Pizarro - forthcoming - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  13
    The Challenge of Accounting for Individual Differences in Folk-Economic Beliefs.Benjamin C. Ruisch, Rajen A. Anderson & David A. Pizarro - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  23
    Blood is Thicker: Moral Spillover Effects Based on Kinship.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Zhu, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2012 - Cognition 124 (2):239-243.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  19
    The Motivated Use and Neglect of Base Rates.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Victoria L. Brescoll & David Pizarro - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):284-285.
    Ego-justifying, group-justifying, and system-justifying motivations contribute to base-rate respect. People tend to neglect (and use) base rates when doing so allows them to draw desired conclusions about matters such as their health, the traits of their in-groups, and the fairness of the social system. Such motivations can moderate whether people rely on the rule-based versus associative strategies identified by Barbey & Sloman (B&S).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark