5 found
Order:
See also
Devlin Russell
York University
  1. Intention as Action Under Development: Why Intention is Not a Mental State.Devlin Russell - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):742-761.
    This paper constructs a theory according to which an intention is not a mental state but an action at a certain developmental stage. I model intention on organic life, and thus intention stands to action as tadpole stands to frog. I then argue for this theory by showing how it overcomes three problems: intending while merely preparing, not taking any steps, and the action is impossible. The problems vanish when we see that not all actions are mature. Just as some (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  30
    Intended and Foreseen Unavoidable Consequences.Devlin Russell - 2018 - Manuscrito 41 (4):481-499.
    What is the difference between an intended consequence and a foreseen unavoidable consequence? The answer, I argue, turns on the exercise of knowhow knowledge in the process that led to the consequence. I argue for this using a theory according to which acting intentionally is acting as a reason. I show how this gives us a more promising explanation of the difference than the dominant explanations, according to which acting intentionally is acting for a reason.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  8
    Jonathan Dancy, Practical Shape: A Theory of Practical Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018), Pp. Xi + 185. £30.00. [REVIEW]Devlin Russell - 2020 - Utilitas 32 (2):253-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Never Forget Your Friends or Their Explanatory Priority.Devlin Russell - manuscript
    of (from British Columbia Philosophy Graduate Conference) This paper attempts to argue for an interpretation of Peter Strawson�s account of moral responsibility that successfully eliminates the threat of determinism. The goal is to capture the spirit of Strawson�s view and elucidate that spirit. I do this by emphasizing an aspect of Strawson�s account that others, like Paul Russell, may find insignificant, and then I demonstrate how this aspect is meant to quash the threat of determinism. Specifically, I claim that Strawson (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  11
    The Myth of a State of Intending.Devlin Russell - 2020 - Dialogue 59 (4):549-559.
    ABSTRACTRecent work by Joseph Raz, Niko Kolodny, and Sergio Tenenbaum suggest that there are no normative constraints peculiar to intentions as such. Such constraints are a myth. We can understand the rationality of intention without positing that intention is a mental state. I argue that, further, we can understand the descriptive nature of intention without positing that intention is a mental state. Such a posit is itself a myth. Instead, intention is an action with certain characteristic sub-actions that play a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark