4 found
Order:
  1.  21
    Commentary on “Normative Orientations of University Faculty and Doctoral Students” (M.S. Anderson).Diane Hoffman-Kim - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (4):463-465.
  2.  20
    The Importance of Defining ‘Data’ in Data Management Policies: Commentary On: “Issues in Data Management”.Julie Richardson & Diane Hoffman-Kim - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (4):749-751.
    What comprises ‘data’ varies from one institution to another based on the information which is deemed important by individual institutions. To effectively and efficiently produce, collect, and retain data, an organization develops specific defining characteristics of data to meet its informational needs. Procedures to maintain and retain knowledge among laboratory members and principal investigators will allow for improved efficiency of data collection. Optimization of communication, maintenance of inventories, record keeping, and updating relevant training programs are all critical to supporting the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’T: The Scientific Community’s Responses to Whistleblowing.Stephanic J. Bird & Diane Hoffman-Kim - 1998 - Science and Engineering Ethics 4 (1):3-6.
    The papers in this issue are based on presentations by the authors at the 163nd National Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Seattle, Washington, 13–18 February 1997 in the session entitled Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don’t: What the Scientific Community Can Do about Whistleblowing organized by Stephanie J. Bird and Diane Hoffman-Kim. The papers have been modified following double blind peer review.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  30
    On Being a Scientist.Kenneth D. Pimple, Philip J. Whitney, Diane Hoffman-Kim & Linda B. McGown - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):309-314.
    Editors’ Note:As a matter of policy, the editors believe that publishing several reviews of selected texts is a valuable exercise which will enable a cross-section of views to be aired. The recently published second edition of the National Academy of Sciences’ report “On Being a Scientist” was considered an appropriate text for such treatment. The reviewer, Kenneth D. Pimple, Ph.D., is a Research Associate at the Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics and American Institutions and a Visiting Lecturer in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark