6 found
Order:
  1.  5
    Negation, concession and refutation in counter-argumentative composition by pupils from 8 to 12 years old and adults.Dominique Guy Brassart - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (1):77-98.
    In a theoretical first part we attempt to articulate the notions of concession, refutation and negation for monological linguistic activity, on the basis among other things of Mœschler's work on conversation. We distinguish the illocutionary act of refutation and the complex intervention of refutation, concession-invention, concession-repetition and concession-quotation. In a second part we analyze the place and role of (descriptive) negation in counter-argumentative texts written by 8- to 12-year-old pupils and adults in an artificial situation. We consider phenomena observed by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  22
    Retour(s) sur “Mir Rose” ou comment analyser et représenter le texte argumentatif (écrit)?Dominique Guy Brassart - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (3):299-332.
    The main purpose of this paper is to account for the varying analysis and formalisations of a same advertisement text, “Mir Rose”, by Jean Michel Adam. First, we draw the methodological frame of this psycholinguistic approach of composing and understanding-memorizing texts. We refer to the notions of prototypical textual schema, semantic macrostructure and superstructure. Then we point out the differences between argumentative text and argumentative discourse. Last, we try to explain why it has been possible for Adam to analyse and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3.  8
    Does a prototypical argumentative schema exist? Text recall in 8 to 13 years olds.Dominique Guy Brassart - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (2):163-174.
    120 students in grades 3 to 7 heard an argumentative text and were immediately submitted to a free recall task. The results show that before grade 7, the subjects did not view the text as argumentative. The discussion centers on the relevancy of a prototypical argumentative schema in accounting for these findings.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  2
    Sebastian McEvoy (ed.), L'invention défensive. Poétique, linguistique, droit. [REVIEW]Dominique Guy Brassart - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):123-127.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  5
    Didactique de l'argumentation écrite: Approches psycho-cognitives. [REVIEW]Dominique Guy Brassart - 1996 - Argumentation 10 (1):69-87.
    Une premiére partie est consacrée à la présentation du cadre dans lequel nous menons nos travaux sur l'argumentation écrite. Nous proposons un certain nombre de distinctions basiques entre ‘text’ et ‘discours’ argumentatif. Nous déclinons ce que nous entendons par ‘argument’. Nous esquissons quelques dimensions d'un modéle psycholinguistique du traitement de l'argumentation écrie (composition, compréhension). Dans une seconde partie, nous apportons quelques données empiriques en relation à la théorie linguistique de l'ascriptivisme soutenue par Ducrot et Anscombre1.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  1
    Sebastian McEvoy (ed.), L'invention défensive. Poétique, linguistique, droit. [REVIEW]Dominique Guy Brassart - 1998 - Argumentation 12 (1):123-127.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark