24 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Don Fawkes [24]Donald Arthur Fawkes [1]
  1.  32
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam (1980). Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  11
    A Note on Determinism and Logic.Don Fawkes - 1991 - Southwest Philosophy Review 7 (2):109-120.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  1
    Regarding Rich’s “Compatibilism Argument” and the ‘Ought- Implies-‘Can’ Argument.Don Fawkes - 1990 - Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (2):123-124.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  28
    Critically Thinking Through Visual Arts.Don Fawkes - 2003 - Inquiry 22 (4):13-25.
    This paper applies the Sonoma Model of Critical Thinking to visual arts in an educational setting. The analysis produces insights into the functioning of the model, insights into visual arts, and pragmaticconclusions regarding relationships among art historians, visual artists, and others. We summarize the Sonoma Model of critical thinking and apply it to thinking about art history and visual arts. We use these insights to apply the Sonoma Model to thinking critically about visual arts in an educational environment. One application (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  20
    Regarding Rich's “Compatibilism Argument” and the 'Ought- Implies-'Can' Argument.Don Fawkes - 1990 - Southwest Philosophy Review 6 (2):123-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  11
    On Teaching Premise/Conclusion Distinctions.Don Fawkes - 1996 - Inquiry 15 (3):74-78.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  18
    Toward Understanding Reasoned Resolution of Disagreement.Don Fawkes - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (1):56-62.
    People disagree. Along with doubt, modesty and curiosity, disagreement is one of the most valuable assets reasoning beings can have. Disagreements give us alternatives. Sometimes we need to decide among alternatives. This paper is for such times; it addresses the development of a rational model for the resolution of disagreement. The goal is to reach rational agreement, or to reach the stage at which disagreement can be clearly described and turned over to rational consensus theories. A rarely noticed problem with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    Critical Thinking and Its Courses.Don Fawkes - 1996 - Inquiry 16 (1):78-81.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  8
    Reliance on Indicator Terms is Not Critical Thinking.Don Fawkes - 2003 - Inquiry 21 (3):7-14.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  7
    A Reasoning Principle and its Uses.Don Fawkes - 2001 - Inquiry 21 (1):43-56.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    Examining the Exam: A Critical Look at the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Dan Flage - 2009 - Inquiry 21 (3):31-46.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16,37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  10
    Simplicity and Theology.Don Fawkes & Tom Smythe - 1996 - Religious Studies 32 (2):259 - 270.
    Richard Swinburne has given a defense of arguments for the existence of God (and in particular of teleological arguments) in his book "The Existence of God" (1979/1991). This paper argues that such theistic arguments fail, and poses some general problems for theistic arguments. Swinburne's use of a principle of simplicity is not given adequate justification and, if justified, works against theism. There are adequate rebuttals to Swinburne's arguments that depend upon there being few particles of basic physics, universal laws of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  7
    A Modest Supplement to Rational Consensus.Don Fawkes - 2003 - Philosophical Forum 34 (1):43–51.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Robert L. Caldwell, 1923-1998.Henry Byerly, Joseph Cowan, Don Fawkes, Don Green, Ann Hickman & Ron Milo - 2001 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 75 (2):106 - 107.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. A Reasoning Principle and its Uses.Don Fawkes - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (1):43-56.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Critical Thinking and Its Courses.Don Fawkes - 1996 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 16 (1):78-81.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Einstein, Ethics, and Action.Don Fawkes - 1999 - In S. Smets J. P. Van Bendegem G. C. Cornelis (ed.), Metadebates on Science. Vub-Press & Kluwer. pp. 6--17.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Examining the Exam: A Critical Look at the California Critical Thinking Skills Test.Don Fawkes, Bill O’Meara, Dave Weber & Dan Flage - 2005 - Science and Education 14 (2):117-135.
  21. Examining the Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Examining the Exam: A Critical Look at the Watson-Glaser Critcal Thinking Appraisal Exam.Don Fawkes, Tom Adajian & Steven Hoeltzel - 2001 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 20 (4):19-33.
    This paper examines the content of the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal exam. Our report is not a statistical review. We find the content of this exam defective in a number of areas. The exam consists of five “tests” of 16 questions for a total of 80 questions. Of these, we cannot recommend test 1, test 2, test 4, and test 5; and, we cannot recommend questions 4, 5, 14, 16, 37, 45, 60, 63, 64, 65, 66, and 67. As shown (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Of Tolerance.Don Fawkes - 1998 - Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 18 (2):58-60.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Reliance on Indicator Terms is Not Critical Thinking.Don Fawkes - 2003 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 21 (3):7-14.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography