Search results for 'Donald van Tol' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. A. Tol (2002). Ren矶an Woudenberg, Het Mysterie van de Identiteit. Een Analytisch-Wijsgerige Studie. Nijmegen 2000: SUN, 126 Pagina’S. ISBN 9058750418. [REVIEW] Philosophia Reformata 67 (1):86-88.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Anthony Tol (1993). Vollenhoven's probleemhistorische methode tegen de achtergrond van zijn systematisch denken. Philosophia Reformata 58:2-27.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Samenvatting van (forthcoming). De Stem van de St (r) aat. Res Publica.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Filip Buekens (1996). Kritiek van de Interpreterende Rede Grondslagen van Donald Davidsons Filosofische Project.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. A. P. Guichard (1989). Ongefundeerd realisme. De taalfilosofie van Donald Davidson AP. Guichard. Krisis 36:29-42.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  8
    F. Buekens (1989). Het Filosofische Project Van Donald Davidson. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (2):316 - 329.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    Richard Kieckhefer (2005). Jan van Herwaarden, Between Saint James and Erasmus. Studies in Late-Medieval Religious Life: Devotion and Pilgrimage in the Netherlands. Trans. Wendie Shaffer and Donald Gardner. (Studies in Medieval and Reformation Thought, 97.) Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2003. Pp. Xxxvii, 703; 8 Black-and-White Figures. $210. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1379-1381.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    Wendell V. Harris (1995). Patrick Henry, Edwin Stein, Gabriele Poole, Richard Rumana, Gerald Prince, Tom Conley, Richard D. Lord, G. Mallary Masters, William E. Cain, Karsten Harries, Robert D. Cottrell, David Halliburton, Colette Gaudin, Virginia A. La Charité, Jeff Mitchell, John Goodliffe, Kerry S. Walters, Thomas Reinert, Dana R. Smith, Michael L. Hall, Christopher McClintick, Julie Van Camp, Warren Ginsberg, Steven Rendall, Donald Pizer, Jean A. Perkins, Roberta Davidson, Christopher Perricone, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Andrew J. McKenna, C. S. Schreiner, Anthony Roda, and Juniper Ellis. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1):136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Staffan Bergwik (2013). Annette Lykknes; Donald L. Opitz; Brigitte Van Tiggelen .For Better or for Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences. Xiv + 319 Pp., Illus., Bibl., Index. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2012. $149. [REVIEW] Isis 104 (3):633-634.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Tatjana Buklijas (2014). Annette Lykknes,Donald L. Opitz andBrigitte van Tiggelen ,For Better or for Worse? Collaborative Couples in the Sciences.Heidelberg, New York and London:Birkhäuser,2012. Pp. Xiv+319. ISBN978-3-0348-0285-7. €23.53. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 47 (4):749-750.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Richard Kieckhefer (2005). Between Saint James and Erasmus. Studies in Late-Medieval Religious Life: Devotion and Pilgrimage in the NetherlandsJan van Herwaarden Wendie Shaffer Donald Gardner. Speculum 80 (4):1379-1381.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  18
    Hilde Buiting, Johannes van Delden, Bregje Onwuteaka-Philpsen, Judith Rietjens, Mette Rurup, Donald van Tol, Joseph Gevers, Paul van Der Maas & Agnes van Der Heide (2009). Reporting of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the Netherlands: Descriptive Study. BMC Medical Ethics 10 (1):18-.
    BackgroundAn important principle underlying the Dutch Euthanasia Act is physicians' responsibility to alleviate patients' suffering. The Dutch Act states that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are not punishable if the attending physician acts in accordance with criteria of due care. These criteria concern the patient's request, the patient's suffering (unbearable and hopeless), the information provided to the patient, the presence of reasonable alternatives, consultation of another physician and the applied method of ending life. To demonstrate their compliance, the Act requires physicians (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  13.  3
    Pauline S. C. Kouwenhoven, Natasja J. H. Raijmakers, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Judith A. C. Rietjens, Donald G. Van Tol, Suzanne van de Vathorst, Nienke de Graeff, Heleen A. M. Weyers, Agnes van der Heide & Ghislaine J. M. W. van Thiel (2015). Opinions About Euthanasia and Advanced Dementia: A Qualitative Study Among Dutch Physicians and Members of the General Public. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):7.
    The Dutch law states that a physician may perform euthanasia according to a written advance euthanasia directive when a patient is incompetent as long as all legal criteria of due care are met. This may also hold for patients with advanced dementia. We investigated the differing opinions of physicians and members of the general public on the acceptability of euthanasia in patients with advanced dementia.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. H. G. Callaway & J. van Brakel (1996). No Need to Speak the Same Language? Review of Ramberg, Donald Davidson's Philosophy of Language. Dialectica, Vol. 50, No.1, 1996, Pp. 63-71 50 (1):63-72.
    The book is an “introductory” reconstruction of Davidson on interpretation —a claim to be taken with a grain of salt. Writing introductory books has become an idol of the tribe. This is a concise book and reflects much study. It has many virtues along with some flaws. Ramberg assembles themes and puzzles from Davidson into a more or less coherent viewpoint. A special virtue is the innovative treatment of incommensurability and of the relation of Davidson’s work to hermeneutic themes. The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  13
    Donald Loose (2006). De verlichting en de problematiek van het kwaad. Wijsgerig Perspectief 46 (2):28-38.
    Met de verlichting komt de mens centraal te staan als de verantwoordelijke in het spanningsveld van vrijheid en determinisme. Daarmee dreigt hij zich ook de schuld van alle kwaad op de hals te halen en wordt de theodicee een antropodicee. Hij kan daar op twee manieren onderuit komen: ofwel wordt alle dwingende natuurwetmatigheid secundair en is nog slechts het morele kwaad relevant, ofwel wordt de vrijheid zelf herleid tot het natuurlijk determinisme. Kant wist echter die spanning in het verlichtingsdenken overeind (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  9
    Donald Sells (2013). N. Fisher, H. Van Wees Competition in the Ancient World. Pp. Xii + 308, Ills. Swansea: The Classical Press of Wales, 2011. Cased, £50. ISBN: 978-1-905125-48-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 63 (1):152-154.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  19
    Donald Wayne Viney (2000). Gijsbert Van den Brink and Marcel Sarot (Eds.), Understanding the Attributes of God [Contributions to Philosophical Theology, Volume 1]. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (2):123-125.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Donald Loose (2006). Een tweevoudig rijk Van de vrijheid: Politiek en de morele symboliek Van de religie volgens Kant. Bijdragen 67 (2):115-141.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Wiebe van der Hoek (2000). Review: Donald Nute, Defeasible Deontic Logic. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):89-94.
  20. Edward Donald Kennedy (1997). Ingrid Tieken-Boon Van Ostade, The Two Versions of Malory's “Morte Darthur”: Multiple Negation and the Editing of the Text.(Arthurian Studies, 35.) Woodbridge, Suffolk; and Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer, 1995. Pp. Ix, 169; Tables and Diagrams. $53. [REVIEW] Speculum 72 (3):892-893.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  1
    Donald Loose (2003). Burger van één wereld? Het theologisch-politiek legaat van het Kantianisme. Bijdragen 64 (4):369-399.
    Are we the Citizens of just one empirical world? Have all reminiscences to the transcendental become atavistic in the political domain? This article defends the lasting relevance of the kantian doctrine of analogy for the significance of both religion and politics in post-modern times. The symbolic representation of the indemonstrable concept of practical reason itself functions as well in politics as in religion in the manner of a typology of the law and a legislation, which must be understood as the (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  1
    Donald Loose (1990). Voor een theologie van de metafoor. Revue Belge de Philologie Et D’Histoire 68 (3):576-596.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Donald Loose (2006). Een tweevoudig rijk van de vrijheid-A Twofold Reign of Freedom. Bijdragen 67 (2):115-141.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. F. A. I. Buekens (2005). Davidson, Donald. In Maarten Doorman & Heleen Pott (eds.), Filosofen van Deze Tijd. Bert Bakker. pp. 195--209.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Edward Donald Kennedy (1997). The Two Versions of Malory's "Morte Darthur": Multiple Negation and the Editing of the Text.Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade. Speculum 72 (3):892-893.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Donald H. Potts (1973). Poh Yap Hian. Postulational Study of an Axiom System of Boolean Algebra. Majallah Tahunan 'Ilmu Pasti—Shu Hsüeh Nien K'an—Bulletin of Mathematical Society of Nanyang University , Pp. 94–110.Dicker R. M.. A Set of Independent Axioms for Boolean Algebra. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Ser. 3 Vol. 13 , Pp. 20–30.Van Albada P. J.. A Self-Dual System of Axioms for Boolean Algebra. Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Proceedings, Series A Vol. 67 , Pp. 377–381; Also Indagationes Mathematicae, Vol. 26 , Pp. 377–381.Diego Antonio and Suárez Alberto. Two Sets of Axioms for Boolean Algebras. Portugaliae Mathematica, Vol. 23 Nos. 3–4 , Pp. 139–145. Van Albada P. J.. Axiomatique des Algèbres de Boole. Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de Belgique, Vol. 18 , Pp. 260–272.Dickson Lawrence J.. A Short Axiomatic System for Boolean Algebra. Pi Mu Epsilon Journal, Vol. 4 No. 6 , Pp. 253–257.Dickey Leroy J.. A Shorter Axiomatic System for Boolean Algebra. Pi Mu Epsilon J. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 38 (4):658-660.
  27. Donald B. Sands (1953). Van den Vos Reynaerde, 1: Teksten Diplomatisch Uitgegeven naar de Bronnen vóór het Jaar 1500Wytze G. Hellinga. Speculum 28 (2):399-402.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Donald Paul Snyder (1968). Clark Romane and Welsh Paul. Introduction to Logic. D. Van Nostrana Company, Inc., Princeton, N.J., Toronto, New York, London, 1962, Xii + 268 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (3):479-480.
  29. N. T. van der Merwe (1993). Drs. A. Tol & Dr. K.A. Bril, Vollenhoven als wijsgeer: Inleidingen en teksten. Amsterdam, Buijten en Schipperheijn, 1992. 376 p. Verantwoording: Christelijk wijsgerige reeks, nr. 8; f.59,50. [REVIEW] Philosophia Reformata 58 (1):80-85.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Wiebe Van Der Hoek (2000). Defeasible Deontic Logic, Edited by Nute Donald, Synthese Library, Vol. 263, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, and London, 1997, X + 354 Pp. [REVIEW] Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 6 (1):89-94.
  31.  1
    Donald E. Pease (1988). Patriarchy, Lentricchia, and Male Feminization. Critical Inquiry 14 (2):379-385.
    So Lentricchia has fulfilled one of his purposes in this essay. He has subverted the patriarchy from within: that is, he has subverted Bloom’s literary history as well as the essentialist feminism associated with it. But he has not fulfilled his affiliated purpose of establishing a dialogue between feminists and feminized males. The “feminization” of literary studies by patriarchal figures like Bloom does not account for the feminization of Stoddard, Gilder, Van Dyke, Woodberry, or Stedman. Their feminization, like that of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  8
    J. A. C. Rietjens, D. G. van Tol, M. Schermer & A. van Der Heide (2009). Judgement of Suffering in the Case of a Euthanasia Request in The Netherlands. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):502-507.
    Introduction: In The Netherlands, physicians have to be convinced that the patient suffers unbearably and hopelessly before granting a request for euthanasia. The extent to which general practitioners (GPs), consulted physicians and members of the euthanasia review committees judge this criterion similarly was evaluated. Methods: 300 GPs, 150 consultants and 27 members of review committees were sent a questionnaire with patient descriptions. Besides a “standard case” of a patient with physical suffering and limited life expectancy, the descriptions included cases in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33.  7
    Donald Van De Veer (1979). Paternalism and Subsequent Consent. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):631 - 642.
  34.  1
    Anna Linda Krause, Viola Borchardt, Meng Li, Marie-José van Tol, Liliana Ramona Demenescu, Bernhard Strauss, Helmut Kirchmann, Anna Buchheim, Coraline D. Metzger, Tobias Nolte & Martin Walter (2016). Dismissing Attachment Characteristics Dynamically Modulate Brain Networks Subserving Social Aversion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  7
    Deanne van Tol (2007). Mothers, Babies, and the Colonial State: The Introduction of Maternal and Infant Welfare Services in Nigeria, 1925-1945. Spontaneous Generations 1 (1):110.
  36.  6
    Donald van De Veer (1973). Marx's View of Justice. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 33 (3):366 - 386.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    D. G. van Tol, P. Kouwenhoven, B. van der Vegt & H. Weyers (2015). Dutch Physicians on the Role of the Family in Continuous Sedation. Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (3):240-244.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  68
    Ernest Lepore & Ludwig Kirk (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Oxford University Press.
    Ernest Lepore and Kirk Ludwig present the definitive critical exposition of the philosophical system of Donald Davidson. Davidson 's ideas had a deep and broad influence in the central areas of philosophy; he presented them in brilliant essays over four decades, but never set out explicitly the overarching scheme in which they all have their place. Lepore's and Ludwig's book will therefore be the key work, besides Davidson 's own, for understanding one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  39. Johanna N. Y. Franklin & Frank Stephan (2010). Van Lambalgen's Theorem and High Degrees. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 52 (2):173-185.
    We show that van Lambalgen's Theorem fails with respect to recursive randomness and Schnorr randomness for some real in every high degree and provide a full characterization of the Turing degrees for which van Lambalgen's Theorem can fail with respect to Kurtz randomness. However, we also show that there is a recursively random real that is not Martin-Löf random for which van Lambalgen's Theorem holds with respect to recursive randomness.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. P. Roger Turner (2012). Jesus' Return as Lottery Puzzle: A Reply to Donald Smith. Religious Studies 48 (3):305-313.
    In his recent paper, “Lottery Puzzles and Jesus’ Return,” Donald Smith says that Christians should accept a very robust skepticism about the future because a Christian ought to think that the probability of Jesus’ return happening at any future moment is inscrutable to her. But I think that Smith’s argument lacks the power to rationally persuade Christians who are antecedently uncommitted as to whether or not we can or do have any substantive knowledge about the future. Moreover, I think (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  71
    Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2007). Donald Davidson's Truth-Theoretic Semantics. Clarendon Press.
    The work of Donald Davidson (1917-2003) transformed the study of meaning. Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, two of the world's leading authorities on Davidson's work, present the definitive study of his widely admired and influential program of truth-theoretic semantics for natural languages, giving an exposition and critical examination of its foundations and applications.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  42. Meghan E. Griffith (2005). Does Free Will Remain a Mystery? A Response to Van Inwagen. Philosophical Studies 124 (3):261-269.
    In this paper, I argue against Peter van Inwagen’s claim (in “Free Will Remains a Mystery”), that agent-causal views of free will could do nothing to solve the problem of free will (specifically, the problem of chanciness). After explaining van Inwagen’s argument, I argue that he does not consider all possible manifestations of the agent-causal position. More importantly, I claim that, in any case, van Inwagen appears to have mischaracterized the problem in some crucial ways. Once we are clear on (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  43. Peter Hawke (2011). Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism. Philosophical Studies 153 (3):351-364.
    In this paper, the author defends Peter van Inwagen’s modal skepticism. Van Inwagen accepts that we have much basic, everyday modal knowledge, but denies that we have the capacity to justify philosophically interesting modal claims that are far removed from this basic knowledge. The author also defends the argument by means of which van Inwagen supports his modal skepticism, offering a rebuttal to an objection along the lines of that proposed by Geirrson. Van Inwagen argues that Stephen Yablo’s recent and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  44.  41
    Erman Kaplama (2016). The Cosmological Aesthetic Worldview in Van Gogh’s Late Landscape Paintings. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 12 (1):218-237.
    Some artworks are called sublime because of their capacity to move human imagination in a different way than the experience of beauty. The following discussion explores how Van Gogh’s The Starry Night along with some of his other late landscape paintings accomplish this peculiar movement of imagination thus qualifying as sublime artworks. These artworks constitute examples of the higher aesthetic principles and must be judged according to the cosmological-aesthetic criteria for they manage to generate a transition between ethos and phusis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  40
    J. E. Malpas (1992). Donald Davidson and the Mirror of Meaning: Holism, Truth, Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
    J. E. Malpas discusses and develops the ideas of Donald Davidson, influential in contemporary thinking on the nature of understanding and meaning, and of truth and knowledge. He provides an account of Davidson's holistic and hermeneutical conception of linguistic interpretation, and, more generally, of the mind. Outlining its Quinean origins and the elements basic to Davidson's Radical Interpretation, J. E. Malpas' book goes on to elaborate this holism and to examine the indeterminacy of interpretation and the principle of charity. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  46.  73
    John Martin Fischer & Neal A. Tognazzini (2007). Exploring Evil and Philosophical Failure: A Critical Notice of Peter van Inwagen's *The Problem of Evil. Faith and Philosophy 24 (4):458-474.
    In his recent book on the problem of evil, Peter van Inwagen argues that both the global and local arguments from evil are failures. In this paper, we engagevan Inwagen’s book at two main points. First, we consider his understanding of what it takes for a philosophical argument to succeed. We argue that while his criterion for success is interesting and helpful, there is good reason to think it is too stringent. Second, we consider his responses to the global and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  47. Michael Huemer (2000). Van Inwagen's Consequence Argument. Philosophical Review 109 (4):525-544.
    Peter van Inwagen ’s argument for incompatibilism uses a sentential operator, “N”, which can be read as “No one has any choice about the fact that....” I show that, given van Inwagen ’s understanding of the notion of having a choice, the argument is invalid. However, a different interpretation of “N” can be given, such that the argument is clearly valid, the premises remain highly plausible, and the conclusion implies that free will is incompatible with determinism.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  48.  4
    Lepore Ernie & Ludwig Kirk (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Clarendon Press.
    Ernest Lepore and Kirk Ludwig present the definitive critical exposition of the philosophical system of Donald Davidson (1917-2003). Davidson's ideas had a deep and broad influence in the central areas of philosophy; he presented them in brilliant essays over four decades, but never set out explicitly the overarching scheme in which they all have their place. Lepore's and Ludwig's book will therefore be the key work, besides Davidson's own, for understanding one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49.  35
    Philippe De Rouilhan (2012). In Defense of Logical Universalism: Taking Issue with Jean van Heijenoort. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):553-586.
    Van Heijenoort’s main contribution to history and philosophy of modern logic was his distinction between two basic views of logic, first, the absolutist, or universalist, view of the founding fathers, Frege, Peano, and Russell, which dominated the first, classical period of history of modern logic, and, second, the relativist, or model-theoretic, view, inherited from Boole, Schröder, and Löwenheim, which has dominated the second, contemporary period of that history. In my paper, I present the man Jean van Heijenoort (Sect. 1); then (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  42
    Harold W. Noonan (2014). Tollensing van Inwagen. Philosophia 42 (4):1055-1061.
    Van Inwagen has an ingenious argument for the non-existence of human artefacts . But the argument cannot be accepted, since human artefacts are everywhere. However, it cannot be ignored. The proper response to it is to treat it as a refutation of its least plausible premise, i.e., to ‘tollens’ it. I first set out van Inwagen’s argument. I then identify its least plausible premise and explain the consequence of denying it, that is, the acceptance of a plenitudinous, pluralist ontology. I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000