123 found
Order:
  1.  55
    On A Priori Contingency.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Analysis 36 (4):201 - 203.
  2.  55
    Ayer Versus Non-Starters.Douglas Odegard - 1966 - Analysis 26 (5):172 - 176.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  27
    Deductive Justification.Catherine M. Canary & Douglas Odegard - 1989 - Dialogue 28 (02):305-.
  4.  31
    Locke's Unnatural Kinds.Douglas Odegard - 1975 - Analysis 35 (6):208 -.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  47
    Unique Reference and Entailment.Douglas Odegard - 1963 - Analysis 23 (4):73 - 79.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  41
    Miracles and Good Evidence.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Religious Studies 18 (1):37-46.
    EVEN IF ’MIRACLE’ MEANS A VIOLATION OF A LAW OF NATURE, A CASE CAN BE MADE FOR THINKING THAT MIRACLES ARE POSSIBLE, DETECTABLE, AND COMPATIBLE WITH SCIENCE. THE CASE WORKS BY DEFINING A LAW-VIOLATION AS AN EVENT OF A KIND THAT IS EPISTEMICALLY IMPOSSIBLE UNLESS THERE IS GOOD EVIDENCE OF A GOD’S PRODUCING AN INSTANCE. HUMAN AND NON-HUMAN OBJECTIONS ARE CONSIDERED AND ANSWERED.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  17
    Resolving Epistemic Dilemmas.Douglas Odegard - 1993 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):161 – 168.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  37
    Alston and Self-Warrant.Douglas Odegard - 1979 - Analysis 39 (1):42 - 44.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  22
    Deep Moral Dilemmas.Douglas Odegard - 1987 - Theoria 53 (2-3):73-86.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  29
    Excluding the Middle From Loose Concepts.Douglas Odegard - 1965 - Theoria 31 (2):138-144.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  11. Phenomenal Time.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Ratio 20 (December):116-122.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  47
    The Correct Use of a Sentence.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Analysis 24 (3):63 - 67.
  13.  33
    The Body Identical With the Human Mind.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - The Monist 55 (4):579-601.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  24
    On Closing the Truth-Value Gap.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Analysis 25 (1):10 - 12.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  28
    Escaping the Cartesian Circle.Douglas Odegard - 1984 - American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (2):167 - 173.
    Descartes' attempt to avoid the charge of circularity is unconvincing, And more recent efforts by scholars such as frankfurt and kenny to defend him on this point have not been entirely successful. The only way to remove the circle is to replace the search for perfect knowledge by a search for knowledge that is less than perfect, Yet not obviously attainable. Philosophers can then defend knowledge claims against metaphysical doubts without fear of having to beg the question, Indeed can even (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  29
    Berkeleian Idealism and the Dream Argument.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Idealistic Studies 11 (2):93-99.
  17. On "a priori" contingency.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Erkenntnis 36 (4):201.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John J. Jenkins, Understanding Locke Reviewed By.Douglas Odegard - 1984 - Philosophy in Review 4 (4):152-153.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  20
    Conclusive Reasons and Knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Mind 85 (338):239-241.
  20.  31
    Locke and the Unreality of Relations.Douglas Odegard - 1969 - Theoria 35 (2):147-152.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  35
    Anscombe, Sensation and Intentional Objects.Douglas Odegard - 1972 - Dialogue 11 (March):69-77.
  22.  41
    The Sense of Mental Events-Corporeal Events.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - Synthese 22 (May):360-368.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  14
    Absurdity and Types.Douglas Odegard - 1966 - Mind 75 (297):97-113.
  24.  31
    Descartes and the Dream Argument.Douglas Odegard - 1995 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 12 (2):155 - 164.
  25.  23
    Can a Justified Belief Be False?Douglas Odegard - 1976 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6 (3):561 - 568.
    Robert richman tries to defend a justified-True-Belief analysis of knowledge by attacking the assumption that a justified belief can be false. But, Although 'p is justified but false' is incoherent if asserted about the way things actually are, It is not incoherent if asserted about a supposed situation. And critics of a justified-True-Belief analysis need only do the latter.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  20
    Arthur Pap and the Paradox of Analysis.Douglas Odegard - 1967 - Theoria 33 (3):230-245.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  10
    Volition and Action.Douglas Odegard - 1988 - American Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):141 - 151.
  28. John Yolton, John Locke: An Introduction Reviewed By.Douglas Odegard - 1986 - Philosophy in Review 6 (2):91-92.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    Indiscernibles.Douglas Odegard - 1964 - Philosophical Quarterly 14 (56):204-213.
  30.  6
    On Two Arguments Against Moral Certainty.Douglas Odegard - 1981 - Mind 90 (357):79-90.
    Some moral philosophers, Such as ross and moore, Think that, Whereas we can be sure of limited judgments concerning "prima facie" duties and intrinsic values, We cannot be sure of judgments of rightness or wrongness. Two arguments for this type of scepticism are examined. The first works only if we assume, With ross, That '"prima facie" duty' is a moral notion, Not an epistemic notion. The second works only if we assume that there is no difference between uncertainty about a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  33
    The Indiscernibility of Identicals and the Relativity of Identity.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (3):313 - 317.
  32. Knowledge and Scepticism.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Rowman & Littlefield.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  2
    Warrant and Responsibility.Douglas Odegard - 1992 - American Philosophical Quarterly 29 (3):253 - 265.
  34.  26
    Locke and Mind-Body Dualism.Douglas Odegard - 1970 - Philosophy 45 (172):87 - 105.
    The word ‘dualism’ can be used to pick out at least four different theories concerning the relationship between mind and body. A mind and a body are two different entities and each is “had” by a man. A man is thus a composite being with two components, one “inner”, the other “outer”. You, for example, are a man and your mind is “inner” in the sense that you alone can reflectively experience yourself thinking, or feeling pain, or seeing colours . (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  22
    Moral Responsibility and Alternatives.Douglas Odegard - 1985 - Theoria 51 (3):125-136.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  18
    Belief, Justification, and Knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1988 - Teaching Philosophy 11 (3):259-261.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  31
    Disembodied Existence and Central State Materialism.Douglas Odegard - 1970 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48 (August):256-60.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  4
    Locke and the Specious Present.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 8 (sup1):141-151.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  8
    Perception.Douglas Odegard - 1978 - Dialogue 17 (1):72-91.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  11
    Foundations for Claiming Knowledge.Douglas Odegard - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (4):613 - 633.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  22
    Knowing That There is No Demon.Douglas Odegard - 1994 - Theoria 60 (2):81-98.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  19
    Locke, Geach, and Individual Essences.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - Philosophical Studies 22 (5-6):70 - 73.
  43.  18
    Identity Through Time.Douglas Odegard - 1972 - American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1):29 - 38.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  18
    Charity and Moral Imperatives.Douglas Odegard - 1989 - Theoria 55 (2):81-94.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  15
    A Study of Spinoza's Ethics.Douglas Odegard - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):545-557.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  22
    Neorationalist Epistemology.Douglas Odegard - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):567-584.
    Whether any beliefs are justified nonempirically is important in a debate with sceptics who deny empirical justification, if the parties involved in the debate claim that their position is justified. Sceptics must assume that their premises are justified nonempirically, to avoid begging the question. The main problem with advocating nonempirical justification is that accounts tend to be either too niggardly or too generous, implying either that nonempirical justification is impossible or that peer adversaries must be equally justified. The way to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  16
    Ignorance: A Case for Scepticism. By Peter Unger. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1975. 323 + Xi. $20.75.Douglas Odegard - 1977 - Dialogue 16 (1):167-171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  15
    Knowledge and the Flow of Information Fred I. Dretske Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981. Pp. Xiv, 273. $18.50.Douglas Odegard - 1982 - Dialogue 21 (4):778-779.
  49.  5
    Inner States.Douglas Odegard - 1992 - Personalist Forum 8 (Supplement):265-73.
  50.  14
    Berkeley and the Perception of Ideas.Douglas Odegard - 1971 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):155 - 171.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 123