Results for 'E. C. W. Krabbe'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  20
    Finite Kripke Models of HA Are Locally PA.E. C. W. Krabbe - 1986 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27:528-532.
  2. From Axiom to Dialogue.E. M. Barth & E. C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Studia Logica 44 (2):228-230.
  3.  1
    Logic and Political Culture.E. M. Barth & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1992 - Royal Netherlands Academy Of.
    Paperback. What has happened to the science of Logic, as an academic discipline and pursuit? The diagnoses do not coincide, but the recognition is growing that since the days of Mill, Russell or Beth, something has gone wrong. A logical vacuum - theoretical as well as practical - in large parts of contemporary culture is easily perceived and is particularly visible in politicis, precisely where logic as a science ought to make its greatest impact.The present volume offers analyses and reflections (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  64
    Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Synthese 63 (3):295 - 328.
    Section 1 contains a survey of options in constructing a formal system of dialogue rules. The distinction between material and formal systems is discussed (section 1.1). It is stressed that the material systems are, in several senses, formal as well. In section 1.2 variants as to language form (choices of logical constants and logical rules) are pointed out. Section 1.3 is concerned with options as to initial positions and the permissibility of attacks on elementary statements. The problem of ending a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5.  44
    Formal Systems of Dialogue Rules.Erick C. W. Krabbe - 1984 - Synthese 58 (2):295 - 328.
    Section 1 contains a survey of options in constructing a formal system of dialogue rules. The distinction between material and formal systems is discussed (section 1.1). It is stressed that the material systems are, in several senses, formal as well. In section 1.2 variants as to language form (choices of logical constants and logical rules) are pointed out. Section 1.3 is concerned with options as to initial positions and the permissibility of attacks on elementary statements. The problem of ending a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6.  44
    On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2007 - Argumentation 21 (3):233-242.
    Any well-structured argumentative exchange must be preceded by some preparatory stages. In the pragma-dialectical four-stage model of critical discussion, the clarification of issues and positions is relegated to the confrontation stage and the other preparatory matters are dealt within the opening stage. In the opening stage, the parties involved come to agree to discuss their differences and to do so by an argumentative exchange rather than by, say, a sequence of bids and offers. They should also come to agree on (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  7.  18
    That’s No Argument! The Dialectic of Non-Argumentation.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1173-1197.
    What if in discussion the critic refuses to recognize an emotionally expressed argument of her interlocutor as an argument, accusing him of having presented no argument at all. In this paper, we shall deal with this reproach, which taken literally amounts to a charge of having committed a fallacy of non-argumentation. As such it is a very strong, if not the ultimate, criticism, which even carries the risk of abandonment of the discussion and can, therefore, not be made without burdening (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  8.  15
    Fair and Unfair Strategies in Public Controversies.Jan Albert van Laar & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2016 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 5 (3):315-347.
    Contemporary theory of argumentation offers many insights about the ways in which, in the context of a public controversy, arguers should ideally present their arguments and criticize those of their opponents. We also know that in practice not all works out according to the ideal patterns: numerous kinds of derailments are an object of study for argumentation theorists. But how about the use of unfairstrategiesvis-à-vis one’s opponents? What if it is not a matter of occasional derailments but of one party’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  9.  64
    Dialogue Foundations: Dialogue Logic Revisited: Erik C. W. Krabbe.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33–49.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  17
    II—Erik C. W. Krabbe: Dialogue Logic Revisited.Erikc Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75 (1):33-49.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  30
    Commentary on Jan Albert van Laar and Erik C. W. Krabbe, “Splitting a Difference of Opinion”.David Godden - unknown
    Jan Albert van Laar and Erik Krabbe’s paper “Splitting a difference of opinion” studies an important type of dialogue shift, namely that from a deliberation dialogue over action or policy options where critical and persuasive argumentation is exchanged about the rational acceptability of the policy options proposed by various parties, to a negotiation dialogue where agreement is reached by a series of compromises, or trade-offs, on the part of each side in the disagreement.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12. Human Agency Language, Duty, and Value : Philosophical Essays in Honor of J.O. Urmson ; Edited by Jonathan Dancy, J.M.E. Moravcsik, and C.C.W. Taylor. [REVIEW]J. O. Urmson, Jonathan Dancy, J. M. E. Moravcsik & C. C. W. Taylor - 1988
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  10
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory. [REVIEW]Ton Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  1
    Reply to My Commentator - Krabbe.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Smiley, C. W. -Altruism Considered Economically.E. E. C. Jones - 1905 - Mind 14:146.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  29
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, Erik C.W. Krabbe, A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Bart Verheij and Jean H.M. Wagemans: Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Springer, Dordrecht, 2014, ISBN: 978-90-481-9472-8 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9473-5 , ISBN: 978-90-481-9474-2. [REVIEW]Ton van Haaften - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (3):345-351.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  24
    Dialogue Foundations.Wilfrid Hodges & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2001 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 75:17-49.
    [Wilfrid Hodges] During the last forty or so years it has become popular to offer explanations of logical notions in terms of games. There is no doubt that many people find games helpful for understanding various logical phenomena. But we ask whether anything is really 'explained' by these accounts, and we analyse Paul Lorenzen's dialogue foundations for constructive logic as an example. The conclusion is that the value of games lies in their ability to provide helpful metaphors and representations, rather (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  18.  8
    Strategies for Strengthening Presumptions and Generating Ethos by Manifestly Ensuring Accountability.Fred Kauffeld & Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    In argumentation, as elsewhere, speakers strategically engage favourable presumptions by manifestly making themselves accountable for their communicative efforts. Such strategies provide the addressee with reasons to regard the speaker as accountable in specific ways and, via that regard for the speaker, with situation-specific rationales for responding positively to what the speaker says. This paper identifies some resources available to arguers for strengthening, elaborating, and focusing such special presumptions. The paper offers an analysis of Barbara Jordan’s “Statement on the Articles of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  25
    Christopher W. Tindale, Fallacies and Argument Appraisal: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007, Xvii + 218 Pp. Series: Critical Reasoning and Argumentation.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):127-131.
  20.  17
    The Adequacy of Material Dialogue-Games.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1978 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19 (3):321-330.
  21. E.M. BARTH and E.C. KRABBE "From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation". [REVIEW]D. Bell - 1984 - History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):141.
  22.  19
    Fundamental Circularities in the Theory of Argumentation.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    Sometimes pernicious circularities appear in definitions of fundamental concepts of argumentation theory. For instance, in pragma-dialectical theory, the concept of a fallacy and that of a critical discussion aiming at resolving a difference of opinion mutually presuppose one another. A similar relationship obtains, in argumentation theory at large, between the concept of argumentation and that of rationality. Again, the concept of an argumentative dialogue presupposes a concept of statement. Yet, statementhood is sometimes claimed to be determined by a locution’s function (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  1
    Empirical Logic and Public Debate: Essays in Honour of Else M. Barth.Erik C. W. Krabbe, Renée José Dalitz & Pier A. Smit (eds.) - 1993 - Rodopi.
    Empirical Logic and Public Debate supplies a large number of previously unpublished papers that together make up a survey of recent developments in the field of empirical logic. It contains theoretical contributions, some of a more formal and some of an informal nature, as well as numerous contemporary and historical case studies. The book will therefore be attractive both to those who wish to focus upon the theory and practice of discussion, debate, arguing, and argument, as well as to those (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24.  6
    Predicaments of the Concluding Stage.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    Argumentative discussion is successful only if, at the concluding stage, both parties can agree about the result of their enterprise. If they can not, the whole discussion threatens to start all over again. Dialectical ruling should prevent this from happening. The paper investigates whether dialectical rules may enforce a decision one way or the other; either by recognizing some arguments as conclusive or some criticisms as devastating. At the end the pragma-dialectical model appears more successful than even its protagonists have (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  25.  12
    Strategies in Dialectic and Rhetoric.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
  26.  13
    The Pragmatics of Deductive Arguments.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
  27.  18
    Winning and Losing for Arguers.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    What roles do “winning” and “losing” have to play in argumentative discussions? We say that someone has “won” a discussion or debate, but also an emphasis on “winning” is often rejected. The question is: can these concepts be so interpreted that justice is done to these antagonistic views? Starting from Aristotelian ideas, the paper purports to establish that the views mentioned above can indeed be reconciled.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  14
    Commentary on Michel Dufour's "On the Difference Between Fallacy and Sophism".Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
  29.  3
    Commentary on Godden.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  12
    Commentary on Blair.Erik C. W. Krabbe - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  11
    Being Right, Admitting That Someone is Right, Being Judged Right. Krabbe, Erik C. W. - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Dialogue Sequents and Quick Proofs of Completeness.Eric C. W. Krabbe - 1988 - In Jakob Hoepelman (ed.), Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference Workshop on Discourse Representation, Dialogue Tableaux, and Logic Programming. M. Niemeyer Verlag.
  33. Gildersleeve, B. L., and C. W. E. Miller: Syntax of Classical Greek. Second Part.E. G. Smith - 1911 - Classical Weekly 5:150-151.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  37
    Zur Textgeschichte Xenophons. Axel W. Von Persson. Lund: C. W. K. Gleerup. 1915.E. C. Marchant - 1915 - The Classical Review 29 (08):254-.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. ECT in Schizophrenia: A Study in Nosologic Imprecision.C. W. Erwin & E. M. Thompson - 1978 - In John Paul Brady & H. Keith H. Brodie (eds.), Controversy in Psychiatry. Saunders. pp. 165--182.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  45
    A Theory of Modal Dialectics.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1986 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (2):191 - 217.
  37. Aristotle’s On Sophistical Refutations.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2012 - Topoi 31 (2):243-248.
  38.  72
    About Old and New Dialectic: Dialogues, Fallacies, and Strategies.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):27-58.
    We shall investigate the similarities and dissimilarities between old and new dialectic. For the ‘old dialectic’, we base our survey mainly on Aristotle’s Topics and Sophistical Refutations, whereas for the ‘new dialectic’, we turn to contemporary views on dialogical interaction, such as can, for the greater part, be found in Walton’s The New Dialectic. Three issues are taken up: types of dialogue, fallacies, and strategies. Though one should not belittle the differences in scope and outlook that obtain between the old (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  39.  33
    Arne Næss (1912–2009).Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2010 - Argumentation 24 (4):527-530.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40.  9
    Creative Reasoning in Formal Discussion.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):483-498.
    Systems of formal dialectics articulate methods of conflict resolution. To this end they provide norms to regulate verbal exchanges between the Proponent of a thesis and an Opponent. These regulated exchanges constitute what are known as formal discussions.One may ask what moves, if any, in formal discusions correspond to arguing for or against the thesis. It is claimed that certain moves of the Proponent's are properly designated as arguing for the thesis, and that certain moves of the Opponent purport to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  41.  27
    Book Review: John Woods, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences (2003). Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press. Pp. Xviii+362, ISBN 0-521-81094-9 (Cloth), 0-521-00934-0 (Paper). [REVIEW]Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):495-499.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  4
    Douglas Neil Walton.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Bart Verheij - 2021 - Argumentation 35 (3):513-518.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  38
    Inconsistent Commitments and Commitment to Inconsistencies.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1990 - Informal Logic 12 (1).
    Inconsistent Commitments and Commitment to Inconsistencies.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  44.  44
    It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).
    The situationally disqualifying ad hominem attack is an argumentative move in critical dialogue whereby one participant points out certain features in his adversary's personal situation that are claimed to make it inappropriate for this adversary to take a particular point of view, to argue in a particular way, or to launch certain criticisms. In this paper, we discuss some examples of this way of arguing. Other types of ad hominem argumentation are discussed as well and compared with the situationally disqualifying (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  45.  14
    Frans H. Van Eemeren (Ed.) (2001), Crucial Concepts in Argumentation Theory.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (3):355-359.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  33
    In the Quagmire of Quibbles: A Dialectical Exploration.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Jan Albert van Laar - 2019 - Synthese 198 (4):3459-3476.
    Criticism may degenerate into quibbling or nitpicking. How can discussants keep quibblers under control? In the paper we investigate cases in which a battle about words replaces a discussion of the matters that are actually at issue as well as cases in which a battle about minor objections replaces a discussion of the major issues. We survey some lines of discussion dealing with these situations in profiles of dialogue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47.  33
    Note on a Completeness Theorem in the Theory of Counterfactuals.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1978 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):91 - 93.
  48.  51
    Noncumulative Dialectical Models and Formal Dialectics.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1985 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 14 (2):129 - 168.
  49.  40
    Meeting in the House of Callias: Rhetoric and Dialectic. [REVIEW]Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):205-217.
    The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe and compare the original goals and perspectives of both rhetoric and dialectic in theory and in practice. Dialectic is the practice and theory of conversations; rhetoric that of speeches. For theory of dialectic, this paper will turn to Aristotle's Topics and Sophistical Refutations; for theory of rhetoric, to his Rhetoric. Thus it will appear that rhetoric and dialectic are pretty close. Yet, on the other hand, there is a long tradition of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  50.  53
    Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic.Erik C. W. Krabbe - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):71-87.
    Formal dialectic has its roots in ancient dialectic. We can trace this influence in Charles Hamblin’s book on fallacies, in which he introduced his first formal dialectical systems. Earlier, Paul Lorenzen proposed systems of dialogical logic, which were in fact formal dialectical systems avant la lettre, with roles similar to those of the Greek Questioner and Answerer. In order to make a comparison between ancient dialectic and contemporary formal dialectic, I shall formalize part of the Aristotelian procedure for Academic debates. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000