Search results for 'Editing' (try it on Scholar)

349 found
Order:
  1.  34
    Martina Baumann (2016). CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing – New and Old Ethical Issues Arising From a Revolutionary Technology. NanoEthics 10 (2):139-159.
    Although germline editing has been the subject of debate ever since the 1980s, it tended to be based rather on speculative assumptions until April 2015, when CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to modify human embryos for the first time. This article combines knowledge about the technical and scientific state of the art, economic considerations, the legal framework and aspects of clinical reality. A scenario will be elaborated as a means of identifying key ethical implications of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  6
    Dale Hample, Ben Warner & Dorian Young (2009). Framing and Editing Interpersonal Arguments. Argumentation 23 (1):21-37.
    Since argument frames precede most other arguing processes, argument editing among them, one’s frames may well predict one’s preferred editorial standards. This experiment assesses people’s arguing frames, gives them arguments to edit, and tests whether the frames actually do predict editorial preferences. Modest relationships between argument frames and argument editing appear. Other connections among frames, editing, and additional individual differences variables are more substantial. Particularly notable are the informative influences of psychological reactance. A new theoretical contribution is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3.  30
    George A. Lozano (2014). Ethics of Using Language Editing Services in An Era of Digital Communication and Heavily Multi-Authored Papers. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (2):363-377.
    Scientists of many countries in which English is not the primary language routinely use a variety of manuscript preparation, correction or editing services, a practice that is openly endorsed by many journals and scientific institutions. These services vary tremendously in their scope; at one end there is simple proof-reading, and at the other extreme there is in-depth and extensive peer-reviewing, proposal preparation, statistical analyses, re-writing and co-writing. In this paper, the various types of service are reviewed, along with authorship (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  74
    Christian Eric Erbacher & Sophia Victoria Krebs (2015). The First Nine Months of Editing Wittgenstein - Letters From G.E.M. Anscombe and Rush Rhees to G.H. Von Wright. Nordic Wittgenstein Review 4 (1):195-231.
    The National Library of Finland and the Von Wright and Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Helsinki keep the collected correspondence of Georg Henrik von Wright, Wittgenstein’s friend and successor at Cambridge and one of the three literary executors of Wittgenstein’s Nachlass. Among von Wright’s correspondence partners, Elizabeth Anscombe and Rush Rhees are of special interest to Wittgenstein scholars as the two other trustees of the Wittgenstein papers. Thus, von Wright’s collections held in Finland promise to shed light on the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    Katrin S. Heimann, Sebo Uithol, Marta Calbi, Maria A. Umiltà, Michele Guerra & Vittorio Gallese (2016). “Cuts in Action”: A High‐Density EEG Study Investigating the Neural Correlates of Different Editing Techniques in Film. Cognitive Science 40 (8).
    In spite of their striking differences with real-life perception, films are perceived and understood without effort. Cognitive film theory attributes this to the system of continuity editing, a system of editing guidelines outlining the effect of different cuts and edits on spectators. A major principle in this framework is the 180° rule, a rule recommendation that, to avoid spectators’ attention to the editing, two edited shots of the same event or action should not be filmed from angles (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  3
    Willemijn M. Gommans, Sean P. Mullen & Stefan Maas (2009). RNA Editing: A Driving Force for Adaptive Evolution? Bioessays 31 (10):1137-1145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  6
    Harvey Marcovitch (2008). What Medical Journal Editing Means to Me. Mens Sana Monographs 6 (1):237.
    _Papers in medical journals are often difficult to understand and tedious to read. An editor's first loyalty should be to readers, by prioritising readability over merely producing a repository of data for the scientific community generally. The web now provides infinite repository space so there is even less excuse for journals to be unreadable. I give examples of how I attempted to improve one journal, despite external pressures and regardless of how it might affect the Impact Factor. As a postscript (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Michael A. R. Biggs & Universitetet I. Bergen (1996). Editing Wittgenstein's "Notes on Logic".
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  3
    Nicholas C. Burbules (2014). Philosophical Reflections on Editing. Educational Theory 64 (4):317-331.
    In this essay Nicholas C. Burbules reviews his experiences and the lessons he learned as editor of Educational Theory for more than twenty years, and he explores some of the normative choices that are inevitably made by any editor in carrying out his or her role. Burbules examines the relationship of a journal to its intellectual field; the review process; communications and interactions with authors; the process of editing and revising manuscripts; questions of representativeness in a theoretically pluralistic field; (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  23
    Joseph P. Magliano & Jeffrey M. Zacks (2011). The Impact of Continuity Editing in Narrative Film on Event Segmentation. Cognitive Science 35 (8):1489-1517.
    Filmmakers use continuity editing to engender a sense of situational continuity or discontinuity at editing boundaries. The goal of this study was to assess the impact of continuity editing on how people perceive the structure of events in a narrative film and to identify brain networks that are associated with the processing of different types of continuity editing boundaries. Participants viewed a commercially produced film and segmented it into meaningful events, while brain activity was recorded with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  6
    Christopher Gyngell, Thomas Douglas & Julian Savulescu (2016). The Ethics of Germline Gene Editing. Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (4).
    Germline Gene Editing has enormous potential both as a research tool and a therapeutic intervention. While other types of gene editing are relatively uncontroversial, GGE has been strongly resisted. In this article, we analyse the ethical arguments for and against pursuing GGE by allowing and funding its development. We argue there is a strong case for pursuing GGE for the prevention of disease. We then examine objections that have been raised against pursuing GGE and argue that these fail. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  37
    Kewal Krishan, Tanuj Kanchan & Bahadur Singh (2016). Human Genome Editing and Ethical Considerations. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):597-599.
    Editing human germline genes may act as boon in some genetic and other disorders. Recent editing of the genome of the human embryo with the CRISPR/Cas9 editing tool generated a debate amongst top scientists of the world for the ethical considerations regarding its effect on the future generations. It needs to be seen as to what transformation human gene editing brings to humankind in the times to come.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  22
    Ben Merriman (2015). Editing”: A Productive Metaphor for Regulating CRISPR. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):62-64.
    The metaphor of “gene editing” has been employed widely in popular discussions of CRISPR technology. The editing metaphor obscures the physical mechanism of action in CRISPR techniques, and understates the present frequency of off-target effects. However, the editing metaphor may be a useful means to think about approaches to regulating the future use of CRISPR. Conceiving of CRISPR as an information technology recalls the highly computational, information-oriented context of genomic research in which CRISPR has emerged. More importantly, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  3
    Holly Randell-Moon, Nicole Anderson, Tracey Bretag, Anthony Burke, Sue Grieshaber, Anthony Lambert, David Saltmarsh & Nicola Yelland (2011). Journal Editing and Ethical Research Practice: Perspectives of Journal Editors. Ethics and Education 6 (3):225 - 238.
    This article offers perspectives from academics with recent journal editing experience on a range of ethical issues and dilemmas that regularly pose challenges for those in editorial roles. Each contributing author has provided commentary and reflection on a select topic that was identified in the research literature concerning academic publishing and journal editing. Topics discussed include the ethical responsibilities of working with international and early career contributors to develop work for publication, balancing influence and responsibility to a journal's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  10
    Günther Witzany (2006). Natural Genome-Editing Competences of Viruses. Acta Biotheoretica 54 (4):235-253.
    It is becoming increasingly evident that the driving forces of evolutionary novelty are not randomly derived chance mutations of the genetic text, but a precise genome editing by omnipresent viral agents. These competences integrate the whole toolbox of natural genetic engineering, replication, transcription, translation, genomic imprinting, genomic creativity, enzymatic inventions and all types of genetic repair patterns. Even the non-coding, repetitive DNA sequences which were interpreted as being ancient remnants of former evolutionary stages are now recognized as being of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  1
    Peter Schäfer & Chaim Milikowsky (2010). 5 Current Views on the Editing of the Rabbinic Texts of Late Antiquity: Reflections on a Debate After Twenty Years. Proceedings of the British Academy 165:79.
    This chapter examines current views concerning the alleged editing of the rabbinic texts of late antiquity. It highlights the author's 1986 article concerning the editing of rabbinic texts and discusses the possibilities of manuscript variations and variant readings of certain texts in different manuscripts. It suggests that there is no evidence of any significant recensional variation in any of the classic works of midrash, neither those included in the corpus of midrash halakhah nor those included in the corpus (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  12
    M. Hunter (2003). Whither Editing? - The Correspondence of John Flamsteed, First Astronomer Royal. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (4):805-820.
    This is a review essay of printed editions of the correspondence of John Flamsteed, Jan Jonston and John Wallis, and of the CD-ROM edition of the Hartlib Papers. It raises various issues concerning the relationship between editions of correspondence and their archival base, and about the criteria used to decide what is appropriate to include as 'correspondence'. It also addresses the rationale of the electronic edition of the Hartlib Papers, particularly the second edition, which extends its remit from the main (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Noel Malcom (2004). The Printing and Editing of Hobbes's De Corpore: A Review of Karl Schuhmann's Edition. [REVIEW] Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 1.
    The Printing and Editing of Hobbes's De Corpore: A Review of Karl Schuhmann's Edition - ABSTRACT: In a careful and appreciative review of Karl Schuhmann’s edition of De corpore, Noel Malcolm points out some shortcomings stemming from what he takes to be a flaw in interpretive perspective, namely, the adoption of editorial standards and procedures better fitted for authors of the period of classical antiquity than for those of the early-modern period.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  3
    S. A. Jawaid (2006). What Medicine and Medical Journal Editing Mean to Me. Mens Sana Monographs 4 (1):62.
    Medicine and medical journalism are both noble professions. Those who are infected with the materialistic virus and want to make quick money should not take up these as professional careers. Editing a good quality peer reviewed medical journal in a developing third world country is extremely frustrating. An editor has to work under considerable stress and strain, and face numerous pressures. However, it is a joy and pleasure to be a successful medical editor. The mere fact that one can (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  7
    Richard Rogers (1992). Investigating Psychology's Taboo: The Ethics of Editing. Ethics and Behavior 2 (4):253 – 261.
    The ethics of editing have remained largely unexplored despite their far-ranging consequences to careers of individual psychologists. I examine three ethical issues as they relate to the editorial process: welfare of the consumer, dual relationships, and objectivity. I conclude that the current practices do not adequately take into account professional ethics, and I offer detailed recommendations on how these practices could be improved.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  4
    Meaghan O'Keefe, Sarah Perrault, Jodi Halpern, Lisa Ikemoto & Mark Yarborough (2015). Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):3-10.
    Metaphors used to describe new technologies mediate public understanding of the innovations. Analyzing the linguistic, rhetorical, and affective aspects of these metaphors opens the range of issues available for bioethical scrutiny and increases public accountability. This article shows how such a multidisciplinary approach can be useful by looking at a set of texts about one issue, the use of a newly developed technique for genetic modification, CRISPRcas9.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  22.  26
    Julian Savulescu & Christopher Gyngell (forthcoming). Ethics and the Risks of Gene Editing. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  17
    Samuel A. Chambers (2016). Editing and Curation. Contemporary Political Theory 15 (1):1-15.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  17
    J. Angelo Corlett (2008). The Ethics of Academic Journal Editing. Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (3):205-209.
    This paper amounts to a reply to Professor Donald G. Brown’s thoughtful comment on my “Ethical Issues in Journal Peer-Review”, which appeared in this journal.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  21
    Otieno Mo (2015). CRISPR-Cas9 Human Genome Editing: Challenges, Ethical Concerns and Implications. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 6 (6).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  4
    John Passmore (1994). Editing Russell's Papers. Grazer Philosophische Studien 49:189-205.
    This paper is both a slice of history, a warning and a congratulation. The history is about how the Russell papers found their way to a steel-town in Canada and how it came about that they have gradually been published. The warning is that it is extremely difficult to conduct such an enterprise on a co-operative basis, which may help to explain why so many enterprises of this kind have issued in failure. The congratulations are for those who have edited (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  2
    Pantelis Golitsis (2016). Editing Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Response to Silvia Fazzo’s Critical Appraisal of Oliver Primavesi’s Edition of Metaphysics Alpha. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98 (4):458-473.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie Jahrgang: 98 Heft: 4 Seiten: 458-473.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  4
    Kristin Andrews (2016). Snipping or Editing? Parsimony in the Chimpanzee Mind-Reading Debate. Metascience 25 (3):377-386.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  16
    Eli Y. Adashi & I. Glenn Cohen (2015). Editing the Genome of the Human Germline: May Cool Heads Prevail. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):40-42.
  30.  19
    J. Benjamin Hurlbut (2015). Limits of Responsibility: Genome Editing, Asilomar, and the Politics of Deliberation. Hastings Center Report 45 (5):11-14.
    On April 3, 2015, a group of prominent biologists and ethicists called for a worldwide moratorium on human genetic engineering in which the genetic modifications would be passed on to future generations. Describing themselves as “interested stakeholders,” the group held a retreat in Napa, California, in January to “initiate an informed discussion” of CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering technology, which could enable high-precision insertion, deletion, and recoding of genes in human eggs, sperm, and embryos. The group declared that the advent of a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  9
    Jonathan Schofer (2003). The Redaction of Desire: Structure and Editing of Rabbinic Teachings Concerning Ye#Duser ("Inclination"). Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (1):19-53.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  27
    Frederick Black (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):351-352.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  13
    Ante S. Lundberg & Rodger Novak (2015). CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing to Cure Serious Diseases: Treat the Patient, Not the Germ Line. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):38-40.
  34.  5
    James A. Harris (2008). Editing Hume's Treatise. [REVIEW] Modern Intellectual History 5 (3):633.
    In 1975 the Clarendon Press at Oxford published Peter Nidditch's edition of John Locke's An Essay concerning Human Understanding . In his Introduction Nidditch says that his edition “offers a text that is directly derived, without modernization, from the early published versions; it notes the provenance of all its adopted readings ; and it aims at recording all relevant differences between these versions”. As Nidditch goes on to acknowledge, the “relevant differences” were many, “requiring several thousand registrations both in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  9
    Norman K. Swazo (2015). CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Editing of Human Β-Globin Gene in Human Cells: A Commentary on the Research Ethics. Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 6 (1):22.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  22
    Lawrence J. Clipper (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):343-345.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  29
    George J. Marlin, Richard P. Rabatin & John L. Swan (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):341-343.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  10
    Edward C. Moore & Arthur W. Burks (1992). Three Notes on the Editing of the Works of Charles S. Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (1):83 - 106.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  6
    Randall McLeod (1981). Un "Editing" Shak-Speare. Substance 10 (4):26.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  26
    Aidan Mackey (1992). Editing Chesterton. The Chesterton Review 18 (1):150-152.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews & Alan Regenberg (2015). Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    Stefan Maas & Alexander Rich (2000). Changing Genetic Information Through RNA Editing. Bioessays 22 (9):790-802.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  23
    William Blissett (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):346-350.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  6
    Don L. Cook & Christian J. W. Kloesel (1992). Two Responses to Moore and Burks on Editing Peirce. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 28 (2):303 - 309.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  22
    John Peterson (1988). Editing Chesterton's Writings. The Chesterton Review 14 (2):345-346.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. C. J. Brainerd, V. F. Reyna, Ron Wright & A. H. Mojardin (2003). Recollection Rejection: False-Memory Editing in Children and Adults. Psychological Review 110 (4):762-784.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  7
    Michael W. Nestor, Elena Artimovich & Richard L. Wilson (2014). The Ethics of Gene Editing Technologies in Human Stem Cells. Ethics in Biology, Engineering and Medicine: An International Journal 5 (4):323-338.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  7
    J. L. Butrica (1997). Editing Propertius. Classical Quarterly 47 (01):176-.
    ‘Quot editores, tot Propertii’ has been a familiar—and much misunderstood—phrase in Propertian scholarship ever since it first appeared in the preface to Phillimore′s Oxford Classical Text of 1901. In its original context it described not an existing situation but rather the chaos that Phillimore alleged would result if editors began to adopt significant numbers of transpositions. Such chaos, however, does characterize the current state of Propertian studies; every interpreter seems to create a different Propertius, who in the last twenty-five years (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  7
    Ken Hirschkop (2015). Editing History: On the Publication of Bakhtin’s Sobranie Sočinenij, 1996–2012. Studies in East European Thought 67 (3-4):129-144.
    From the very beginning, it has been difficult to extract a smooth narrative from the complex plot of Bakhtin’s life and work. Early attempts to do this proposed an unconvincing distinction between a private philosophical Bakhtin and the man who wrote compelling and innovative work on the philosophy of language, the stylistics of the novel, and the culture of carnival. The 7-volume Sobranie sočinenij both frustrates and supports this simplifying narrative. The texts it presents, many radically different from earlier published (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  9
    Liu Bing (2006). Some Historical Analysis of the Translating, Editing, and Publishing Process of the Collection of Albert Einstein in China. Synthesis Philosophica 21 (2):285-298.
    As in other countries, Einstein has been one of the most famous scientists in China. In 1970’s, the three volumes Collection of Einstein in Chinese have been selected, translated and published, which was the main sources for Chinese people knowing Einstein for long time, and even had important ideological influence. However, as the background of it, in China, there were very influential political movements related to criticism of science after 1949, which also influenced the decision, selection, progress and the way (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 349