6 found
Order:
  1.  23
    A Cross Sectional Survey of Recruitment Practices, Supports, and Perceived Roles for Unaffiliated and Non-scientist Members of IRBs.Stuart G. Nicholls, Holly A. Taylor, Richard James, Emily E. Anderson, Phoebe Friesen, Toby Schonfeld & Elyse I. Summers - 2023 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 14 (3):174-184.
    Background Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are federally mandated to include both nonscientific and unaffiliated representatives in their membership. Despite this, there is no guidance or policy on the selection of unaffiliated or non-scientist members and reports indicate a lack of clarity regarding members’ roles. In the present study we sought to explore processes of recruitment, training, and the perceived roles for unaffiliated and non-scientist members of IRBs.Methods We distributed a self-administered REDCap survey of members of the Association for the Accreditation (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  13
    Balancing Protection and Inclusion by Including More Non-Scientist and Nonaffiliated Members on IRBs.Emily E. Anderson - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (6):116-118.
    Given the primary mandate for institutional review boards (IRBs) to protect potential participants from harm, the egregious history of research abuses, and the fact that there is no mention of incl...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  25
    What Can State Medical Boards Do to Effectively Address Serious Ethical Violations?Tristan McIntosh, Elizabeth Pendo, Heidi A. Walsh, Kari A. Baldwin, Patricia King, Emily E. Anderson, Catherine V. Caldicott, Jeffrey D. Carter, Sandra H. Johnson, Katherine Mathews, William A. Norcross, Dana C. Shaffer & James M. DuBois - 2023 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 51 (4):941-953.
    State Medical Boards (SMBs) can take severe disciplinary actions (e.g., license revocation or suspension) against physicians who commit egregious wrongdoing in order to protect the public. However, there is noteworthy variability in the extent to which SMBs impose severe disciplinary action. In this manuscript, we present and synthesize a subset of 11 recommendations based on findings from our team’s larger consensus-building project that identified a list of 56 policies and legal provisions SMBs can use to better protect patients from egregious (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  8
    The Need for Evidence-Based Research Ethics.Emily E. Anderson - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (11):60-62.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  12
    The Role of Community-Based Organizations in the Recruitment of Human Subjects: Ethical Considerations.Emily E. Anderson - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (3):20-21.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  20
    Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.Emily E. Anderson, Silvia Tejada, Richard B. Warnecke & Kent Hoskins - 2018 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 8 (1):53-66.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark