34 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Eric M. Meslin [32]Eric Mark Meslin [3]
  1.  62
    Giving Patients Granular Control of Personal Health Information: Using an Ethics ‘Points to Consider’ to Inform Informatics System Designers.Eric M. Meslin, Sheri A. Alpert, Aaron E. Carroll, Jere D. Odell, William M. Tierney & Peter H. Schwartz - 2013 - International Journal of Medical Informatics 82:1136-1143.
    Objective: There are benefits and risks of giving patients more granular control of their personal health information in electronic health record (EHR) systems. When designing EHR systems and policies, informaticists and system developers must balance these benefits and risks. Ethical considerations should be an explicit part of this balancing. Our objective was to develop a structured ethics framework to accomplish this. -/- Methods: We reviewed existing literature on the ethical and policy issues, developed an ethics framework called a “Points to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  41
    The Ethics of Information: Absolute Risk Reduction and Patient Understanding of Screening.Peter H. Schwartz & Eric M. Meslin - 2008 - Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (6):867-870.
    Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decisionmaking. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  54
    Provider Responses to Patients Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care.William M. Tierney, Sheri A. Alpert, Amy Byrket, Kelly Caine, Jeremy C. Leventhal, Eric M. Meslin & Peter H. Schwartz - 2015 - Journal of General Internal Medicine 30 (1):31-37.
    Applying Fair Information Practice principles to electronic health records (EHRs) requires allowing patient control over who views their data.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  50
    How Bioethics Principles Can Aid Design of Electronic Health Records to Accommodate Patient Granular Control.Eric M. Meslin & Peter H. Schwartz - 2014 - Journal of General Internal Medicine 30 (1):3-6.
    Ethics should guide the design of electronic health records (EHR), and recognized principles of bioethics can play an important role. This approach was adopted recently by a team of informaticists designing and testing a system where patients exert granular control over who views their personal health information. While this method of building ethics in from the start of the design process has significant benefits, questions remain about how useful the application of bioethics principles can be in this process, especially when (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  45
    Patient Preferences in Controlling Access to Their Electronic Health Records: A Prospective Cohort Study in Primary Care.Peter H. Schwartz, Kelly Caine, Sheri A. Alpert, Eric M. Meslin, Aaron E. Carroll & William M. Tierney - 2015 - Journal of General Internal Medicine 30:25-30.
    Introduction: Previous studies have measured individuals’ willingness to share personal information stored in an electronic health record (EHR) with healthcare providers. But none have measured preferences when patients’ choices determine access by healthcare providers. -/- Methods: Patients were given the ability to control the access of doctors, nurses or other staff in a primary care clinic to personal information stored in an EHR. Patients could restrict access to all personal data or to specific types of sensitive information, and could restrict (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  11
    The Incommensurability of Research Risks and Benefits: Practical Help for Research Ethics Committees.Douglas K. Martin, Eric M. Meslin, Nitsa Kohut & Peter A. Singer - forthcoming - IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  39
    Patient Understanding of Benefits, Risks, and Alternatives to Screening Colonoscopy.Peter H. Schwartz, Elizabeth Edenberg, Patrick R. Barrett, Susan M. Perkins, Eric M. Meslin & Thomas F. Imperiale - 2013 - Family Medicine 45 (2):83-89.
    While several tests and strategies are recommended for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, studies suggest that primary care providers often recommend colonoscopy without providing information about its risks or alternatives. These observations raise concerns about the quality of informed consent for screening colonoscopy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  37
    To Be or Not to Be – A Research Subject.Eric M. Meslin & Peter H. Schwartz - 2010 - In Thomasine Kushner (ed.), Surviving Health Care: A Manual for Patients and their Families. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 146-162.
    Most people do not know there are different kinds of medical studies; some are conducted on people who already have a disease or medical condition, and others are performed on healthy volunteers who want to help science find answers. No matter what sort of research you are invited to participate in, or whether you are a patient when you are asked, it’s entirely up to you whether or not to do it. This decision is important and may have many implications (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  17
    Helsinki Discords: FDA, Ethics, and International Drug Trials.Jonathan Kimmelman, Charles Weijer & Eric M. Meslin - unknown
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  31
    Protecting Human Subjects From Harm Through Improved Risk Judgments.Eric M. Meslin - forthcoming - IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  6
    The President's Council: Fair and Balanced?Eric M. Meslin - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (2):6.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12.  11
    “Because It Was Hard …”: Some Lessons Developing a Joint IRB Between Moi University (Kenya) and Indiana University (USA).Eric M. Meslin, David Ayuku & Edwin Were - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (5):17-19.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  31
    Hospital Ethics Committees in the United Kingdom.Eric M. Meslin, Claire Rayner, Vic Larcher, Tony Hope & Julian Savulescu - 1996 - HEC Forum 8 (5):301-315.
  14. Achieving Global Justice in Health Through Global Research Ethics: Supplementing Macklin's "Top-Down" Approach with One From the "Ground Up".Eric M. Meslin - 2008 - In Ronald M. Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  10
    The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research Program at the National Human Genome Research Institute.Elizabeth J. Thomson, Joy T. Boyer & Eric M. Meslin - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (3):291-298.
  16.  53
    United States and Canadian Approaches to Justice in Health Care: A Comparative Analysis of Health Care Systems and Values.Nancy S. Jecker & Eric M. Meslin - 1994 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (2).
    The purpose of this study is to compare and contrast the basic ethical values underpinning national health care policies in the United States and Canada. We use the framework of ethical theory to name and elaborate ethical values and to facilitate moral reflection about health care reform. Section one describes historical and contemporary social contract theories and clarifies the ethical values associated with them. Sections two and three show that health care debates and health care systems in both countries reflect (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Adding to the Canon: The Final Report. [REVIEW]Eric M. Meslin - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):34.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  17
    Principlism and the Ethical Appraisal of Clinical Trials.Eric M. Meslin, Heather J. Sutherland, James V. Lavery & James E. Till - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (4):399–418.
  19.  13
    To Research That is the Question: Ethical Issues in Research When Medical Care is Disrupted by Political Action: A Case Study From Eldoret, Kenya.Darlene R. House, Irene Marete & Eric M. Meslin - 2016 - Journal of Medical Ethics 42 (1):61-65.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  11
    Judging the Ethical Merit of Clinical Trials: What Criteria Do Research Ethics Board Members Use?Eric M. Meslin, James V. Lavery, Heather J. Sutherland & James E. Till - forthcoming - IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  10
    Protecting Ideas: Ethical and Legal Considerations When a Grant’s Principal Investigator Changes.Leonidas G. Koniaris, Mary I. Coombs, Eric M. Meslin & Teresa A. Zimmers - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):1051-1061.
    Ethical issues related the responsible conduct of research involve questions concerning the rights and obligations of investigators to propose, design, implement, and publish research. When a principal investigator transfers institutions during a grant cycle, financial and recognition issues need to be addressed to preserve all parties’ obligations and best interests in a mutually beneficial way. Although grants often transfer with the PI, sometimes they do not. Maintaining a grant at an institution after the PI leaves does not negate the grantee (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  11
    From the Guest Editors.Jonathan D. Moreno & Eric M. Meslin - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (4):iii–iv.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  7
    REVIEWS: Adding to the Canon The Final Report. [REVIEW]Eric M. Meslin - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):34-36.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  17
    Some Initial Reflections on NBAC.Eric Mark Meslin & Harold T. Shapiro - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (1):95-102.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  6
    Tribute to Dorothy Wertz.Jonathan D. Moreno & Eric M. Meslin - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (4).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  12
    Bioethics for Clinicians: 10. Research Ethics.Charles Weijer, Bernard Dickens & Eric M. Meslin - unknown
    Medical research involving human subjects raises complex ethical, legal and social issues. Investigators sometimes find that their obligations with respect to a research project come into conflict with their obligations to individual patients. The ethical conduct of research rests on 3 guiding principles: respect for persons, beneficience, and justice. Respect for persons underlies the duty to obtain informed consent from study participants. Beneficence demands a favourable balance between the potential benefits and harms of participation. Justice requires that vulnerable people not (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Can National Bioethics Commissions Be Progressive? Should They?Eric M. Meslin - 2010 - In Jonathan D. Moreno & Sam Berger (eds.), Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics. MIT Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  4
    Some Clues About the President's Council on Bioethics.Eric M. Meslin - 2002 - Hastings Center Report 32 (1):8.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  4
    The Moral Costs of the Ontario Physicians' Strike.Eric M. Meslin - 1987 - Hastings Center Report 17 (4):11-14.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  16
    The Sage Handbook of Health Care Ethics: Core and Emerging Issues.Ruth F. Chadwick, H. ten Have & Eric Mark Meslin (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
    This authoritative Handbook brings together experts with backgrounds in philosophy, sociology, law, public policy and the health professions and reflects the increasing impact of globalization and the dynamic advances in the fields of ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Adding to the Canon: The Final ReportFinal Report: White House Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments.Eric M. Meslin - 1996 - Hastings Center Report 26 (5):34.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Can National Bioethics Commissions Be.Eric M. Meslin - 2010 - In Jonathan D. Moreno & Sam Berger (eds.), Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics. MIT Press. pp. 143.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Down" Approach with One From the "Ground Up".Eric M. Meslin - 2008 - In Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Principlism and the Ethical Appraisal of Clinical Trials.Eric M. Meslin - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (5):399.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography