13 found
Order:
  1.  73
    On Explanatory Relata in Singular Causal Explanation.Eugen Zeleňák - 2009 - Theoria 75 (3):179-195.
    Explanation is usually taken to be a relation between certain entities. The aim of this paper is to discuss what entities are suitable as explanatory relata of singular causal explanations, i.e., explanations concerning singular causality relating particular events or other appropriate entities. I outline three different positions. The purely causal approach stipulates that the same entities that are related in the singular causal relation are also linked by the explanatory relation. This position, however, has a problem to distinguish between causation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  18
    Two Approaches to Event Ontology.Eugen Zeleňák - 2009 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 16 (3):283-303.
    In the paper, I distinguish between the semantic and the “direct” approach to event ontology. The first approach, employed by D. Davidson, starts with logical analysis of natural language. This analysis uncovers quantification over the domain of events. Thus, we have ontological commitment to events and, at the same time, also a suggestion of how to view their nature. The second approach, used by J. Kim and D. Lewis, deals with events “directly”, i.e. not by analyzing language first. Events are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    On Pragmatic and Non-Pragmatic Concept of Explanation.Eugen Zeleňák - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 13 (3):334-348.
    This paper attempts to analyze in detail the difference between a pragmatic and non-pragmatic approach to explanation. Proponents of a pragmatic explanation analyze it by means of the concepts of context or audience. However, there could be various disguises of this type of approach. It is possible to include pragmatic concepts into the characterization of the item to be explained or the item that explains. On the other hand, pragmatic approach may focus on the specific relation between the item to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  31
    On Sense, Reference, and Tone in History.Eugen Zelenak - 2010 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 4 (3-4):354-374.
    This paper tries to show how the Fregean semantic framework, especially the notions of sense and tone, can be used to explain certain features of history. Following Michael Dummett's interpretation of Gottlob Frege's notion of meaning, it is possible to conceive of historical works as proposing particular modes of presentation of past events. In fact, alternative historical works about the same past events could be viewed as differing in what sense and tone they express. In this paper, I first outline (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  6
    A Problem for Popper's Fallibilism.Ladislav Kvasz & Eugen Zeleňák - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 71--81.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  4
    O paradoxe havranov, o novej záhade indukcie ao ich predstavení.Eugen Zeleňák - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (4):523-542.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    Semantics of Historical Representation in Terms of Aspects.Eugen Zeleňák - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (2):244-256.
    In his latest book, Frank Ankersmit proposes an original theory of historical representation. In this review I focus on what I take to be his most important semantic points with respect to representation, meaning, truth, and reference. First, I provide a short summary of the book. Second, I explore his semantics in terms of aspects and compare it with a different account inspired by the Fregean notion of mode of presentation. As my examination shows, Ankersmit’s analysis faces the problem of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    Using Goodman to Explore Historical Representation.Eugen Zeleňák - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):371-395.
    Several authors argue that historical works should be viewed as relatively complex and autonomous constructions that are of interest in their own right. In the paper I follow this general approach to history and provide an analysis of historical representation inspired mainly by Nelson Goodman’s observations about symbols. In Languages of Art, Goodman makes a number of interesting claims regarding pictorial representation, exemplification and expression, which could be employed to clarify certain semantic questions of history. He convincingly shows that there (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    5. Two Versions of a Constructivist View of Historical Work.Eugen Zeleňák - 2015 - History and Theory 54 (2):209-225.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    Indirect Reference and the Creation of Distance in History.Eugen Zeleňák - 2011 - History and Theory 50 (4):68-80.
    ABSTRACTIn his discussion of David Hume and historical distance, Mark Salber Phillips points out that in the process of distance‐creation there is a distinction between something occurring “within the text” and “outside the text.” In this paper I draw on this distinction and introduce a semantic mechanism that allows a certain distance to be designed within a historical text. This mechanism is highlighted in a view of reference that sees it as indirect . According to the indirect reference view, meaning (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Historical Fact, Realism and Constructivism.Eugen Zelenak - 2009 - Filozofia 64 (7):625-633.
    The aim of the paper is to discuss the account of the fact presented by Václav ?erník. First, the author outlines the views of the defenders of the naïve realism, constructivism , and critical realism in historiography. The leading proponents of narrativism hold, that what the historians construe is not single facts, but general narrative interpretations. The second part offers a critical analysis of some notions and distinctions introduced by ?erník in his theory of the social fact. The most questionable (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Historický fakt, realizmus a konštruktivizmus.Eugen Zeleñák - 2009 - Filozofia 64 (7).
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. On Two Approaches to Narrative Explanations.Eugen Zelenak - 2010 - Filozofia 65 (8):762-769.
    The paper deals with one of the central topics of the philosophy of history – the narrative. Two different views of narrative and consequently of narrative explanation are distinguished. According to the first position , reality itself does not have a narrative structure, but since we are familiar with the narrative form, we can explain events if we present them as a story of a particular kind. According to the second position , in order to explain, we need to capture (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography