Order:
See also
Eva Erman
Stockholm University
  1.  95
    Three Failed Charges Against Ideal Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2013 - Social Theory and Practice 39 (1):19-44.
    An intensified discussion on the role of normative ideals has re-emerged in several debates in political philosophy. What is often referred to as “ideal theory,” represented by liberal egalitarians such as John Rawls, is under attack from those that stress that political philosophy at large should take much more seriously the nonideal circumstances consisting of relations of domination and power under which normative ideals, principles, and ideas are supposed to be applied. While the debate so far has mainly been preoccupied (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  29
    Practice-Dependence and Epistemic Uncertainty.Eva Erman - 2017 - Journal of Global Ethics 13 (2):187-205.
    A shared presumption among practice-dependent theorists is that a principle of justice is dependent on the function or aim of the practice to which it is supposed to be applied. In recent contributions to this debate, the condition of epistemic uncertainty plays a significant role for motivating and justifying a practice-dependent view. This paper analyses the role of epistemic uncertainty in justifying a practice-dependent approach. We see two kinds of epistemic uncertainty allegedly playing this justificatory role. What we call ‘normative (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3.  24
    What Distinguishes the Practice-Dependent Approach to Justice?Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (1):3-23.
    The practice-dependent approach to justice has received a lot of attention in post-millennium political philosophy. It has been developed in different directions and its normative implications have been criticized, but little attention has been directed to the very distinction between practice-dependence and practice-independence and the question of what theoretically differentiates a practice-dependent account from mainstream practice-independent accounts. The core premises of the practice-dependent approach, proponents argue, are meta-normative and methodological. A key feature is the presumption that a concept of justice (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  80
    Practices and Principles: On the Methodological Turn in Political Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (8):533-546.
    The question of what role social and political practices should play in the justification of normative principles has received renewed attention in post-millennium political philosophy. Several current debates express dissatisfaction with the methodology adopted in mainstream political theory, taking the form of a criticism of so-called ‘ideal theory’ from ‘non-ideal’ theory, of ‘practice-independent’ theory from ‘practice-dependent’ theory, and of ‘political moralism’ from ‘political realism’. While the problem of action-guidance lies at the heart of these concerns, the critics also share a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  5. Political Legitimacy in the Real Normative World: The Priority of Morality and the Autonomy of the Political.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2015 - British Journal of Political Science 45 (1):215-233.
  6. A Function-Sensitive Approach to the Political Legitimacy of Global Governance.Eva Erman - forthcoming - British Journal of Political Science.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  14
    A World of Possibilities: The Place of Feasibility in Political Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - forthcoming - Res Publica:1-23.
    Although the discussion about feasibility in political theory is still in its infancy, some important progress has been made in the last years to advance our understanding. In this paper, we intend to make a contribution to this growing literature by investigating the proper place of feasibility considerations in political theory. A motivating force behind this study is a suspicion that many presumptions made about feasibility in several current debates—such as that between practice-independence and practice-dependence, ideal and non-ideal theory, and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  59
    Brandom and Political Philosophy.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2014 - Journal of Political Philosophy 22 (4):486-498.
  9.  48
    Why Political Realists Should Not Be Afraid of Moral Values.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Research 40:459-464.
    In a previous article, we unpacked the so-called “ethics first premise”—the idea that ethics is “prior” to politics when theorizing political legitimacy— that is denied by political realists. We defended a “justificatory” reading of this premise, according to which political justification is irreducibly moral in the sense that moral values are among the values that ground political legitimacy. We called this the “necessity thesis.” In this paper we respond to two challenges that Robert Jubb and Enzo Rossi raise against our (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  10.  33
    What Not to Expect From the Pragmatic Turn in Political Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2014 - European Journal of Political Theory (2):1474885114537635.
    The central ideas coming out of the so-called pragmatic turn in philosophy have set in motion what may be described as a pragmatic turn in normative political theory. It has become commonplace among political theorists to draw on theories of language and meaning in theorising democracy, pluralism, justice, etc. The aim of this paper is to explore attempts by political theorists to use theories of language and meaning for such normative purposes. Focusing on Wittgenstein's account, it is argued that these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  11.  20
    The Boundary Problem and the Ideal of Democracy.Eva Erman - 2014 - Constellations 21 (2):535-546.
  12.  16
    Does Global Democracy Require a World State?Eva Erman - 2019 - Philosophical Papers 48 (1):123-153.
    The question of whether global democracy requires a world state has with few exceptions been answered with an unequivocal ‘No’. A world state, it is typically argued, is neither feasible nor desirable. Instead, different forms of global governance arrangements have been suggested, involving non-hierarchical and multilayered models with dispersed authority. The overall aim of this paper is to addresses the question of whether global democracy requires a world state, adopting a so-called ‘function-sensitive’ approach. It is shown that such an approach (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  9
    What Not to Expect From the Pragmatic Turn in Political Theory.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2015 - European Journal of Political Theory 14 (2):121-140.
  14.  17
    How Practices Do Not Matter.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2019 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy (1).
  15. Global Political Legitimacy Beyond Justice and Democracy?Eva Erman - 2016 - International Theory 8 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  28
    What is Wrong with Agonistic Pluralism?: Reflections on Conflict in Democratic Theory.Eva Erman - 2009 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 35 (9):1039-1062.
    During the last couple of decades, concurrently with an increased awareness of the complexity of ethical conflicts, political theorists have directed attention to how constitutional democracy should cope with a fact of incommensurable doctrines. Poststructuralists such as Chantal Mouffe claim that ethical conflicts are fundamentally irreconcilable, which is indeed a view shared by many liberal theorists. The question of whether ethical conflicts are in principle irreconcilable is an important one since the answer has implications for what democratic institutions are desirable. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17.  13
    The Interdependence of Risk and Moral Theory.Eva Erman - 2018 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 21 (2):207-216.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18. Political Legitimacy for Our World: Where is Political Realism Going?Eva Erman - 2018 - Journal of Politics 80 (2):525-538.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  15
    Why Democracy Cannot Be Grounded in Epistemic Principles.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):449-473.
    In recent years, philosophers influenced by Peirce's pragmatism have contributed to the democracy debate by offering not simply a justification of democracy that relies on epistemic as well as moral presumptions, but a justification on purely epistemic grounds, that is, without recourse to any moral values or principles. In a nutshell, this pragmatist epistemic argument takes as its starting-point a few fundamental epistemic principles we cannot reasonably deny, and goes on to claim that a number of interpersonal epistemic commitments follow, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  57
    Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy.Eva Erman - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):463.
    On most accounts of global democracy, human rights are ascribed a central function. Still, their conceptual role in global democracy is often unclear. Two recent attempts to remedy this deficiency have been made by James Bohman and Michael Goodhart. What is interesting about their proposals is that they make the case that under the present circumstances of politics, global democracy is best conceptualized in terms of human rights. Although the article is sympathetic to this ‘human rights approach’, it defends the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21.  8
    Representation, Equality, and Inclusion in Deliberative Systems: Desiderata for a Good Account.Eva Erman - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (3):263-282.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22. On Goodhart's Global Democracy: A Critique.Eva Erman - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4).
    In this critique of Michael Goodhart's "Human Rights and Global Democracy," Eva Erman argues that Goodhart has reconceptualized democracy and therefore does not offer a better understanding of the relationship between human rights and global democracy.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  23. Freedom as Non-Domination or How to Throw the Agent Out of the Space of Reasons.Eva Erman - 2011 - Journal of Power 3 (1).
    This paper analyzes agency in Pettit’s republican conception of freedom. By understanding freedom intersubjectively in terms of agency, Pettit makes an important contribution to the contemporary debate on negative liberty. At the same time, some of the presumptions about agency are problematic. The paper defends the thesis that Pettit is not able to provide the sufficient conditions for freedom as non-domination that he sets out to do. In order to show why this is the case and how we can address (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24. Territories of Citizenship.Eva Erman & Ludvig Beckman - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  25. The Boundary Problem and the Right to Justification.Eva Erman - 2014 - In D. Owen (ed.), Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification. Bloomsbury Academic.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  32
    Reconciling Communicative Action with Recognition: Thickening the ‘Inter’ of Intersubjectivity.Eva Erman - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (3):377-400.
    There is an underlying idea of symmetry involved in most notions of rationality. From a dialogical philosophical standpoint, however, the symmetry implied by social contract theories and so-called Golden Rule thinking is anchored to a Cartesian subject–object world and is therefore not equipped to address recognition – at least not if recognition is to be understood as something happening between subjects. For this purpose, the dialogical symmetry implied by Habermas' communicative action does a much better job. Still, it is insufficient (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27. Legitimacy Beyond the State? Re-Examining the Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors.Eva Erman & Anders Uhlin - 2010 - Palgrave Macmillan.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28. On Goodhart's Global Democracy: A Critique.Eva Erman - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (4).
  29.  27
    The Political Legitimacy of Global Governance and the Proper Role of Civil Society Actors.Eva Erman - 2018 - Res Publica 24 (1):133-155.
    In this paper, two claims are made. The main claim is that a fruitful approach for theorizing the political legitimacy of global governance and the proper normative role of civil society actors is the so-called ‘function-sensitive’ approach. The underlying idea of this approach is that the demands of legitimacy may vary depending on function and the relationship between functions. Within this function-sensitive framework, six functions in global governance are analyzed and six principles of legitimacy defended, together constituting a minimalist account (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Political Equality and Legitimacy in a Global Context.Eva Erman - 2013 - In E. Erman & S. Näsström (eds.), Political Equality in Transnational Democracy. Palgrave-Macmillan.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  7
    Human Rights Do Not Make Global Democracy.Eva Erman - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (4):463-481.
    On most accounts of global democracy, human rights are ascribed a central function. Still, their conceptual role in global democracy is often unclear. Two recent attempts to remedy this deficiency have been made by James Bohman and Michael Goodhart. What is interesting about their proposals is that they make the case that under the present circumstances of politics, global democracy is best conceptualized in terms of human rights. Although the article is sympathetic to this ‘human rights approach’, it defends the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32.  28
    Human Rights and Democracy: Discourse Theory and Human Rights Institutions.Eva Erman - 2005 - London: Routledge.
  33. Democratic Credentials of Transnational Actors.Eva Erman - 2010 - In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave-Macmillan.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  7
    Political Legitimacy and the Unreliability of Language.Eva Erman & Niklas Möller - 2016 - Public Reason 8 (1-2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Legitimacy in the Global Normative Order: Moral, Political and Democratic Justificatory Practices in the Space of Reasons.Eva Erman - 2014 - In S. Gupta (ed.), Politics in the Global Age: Critical Reflections on Cosmopolitanism. Routledge.
  36. Why Adding Democratic Values is Not Enough For Global Democracy.Eva Erman - 2010 - In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave-Macmillan.
  37.  22
    Conflict and Universal Moral Theory.Eva Erman - 2007 - Political Theory 35 (5):598-623.
    The solutions to moral problems offered by contemporary moral theories largely depend on how they understand pluralism. This article compares two different kinds of universal moral theories, liberal impartiality theory and discourse ethics. It defends the twofold thesis that (1) a dialogical theory such as discourse ethics is better equipped to give an account of pluralism than impartiality theory due to a more correct understanding of the nature of conflict, but that (2) discourse ethics cannot, contrary to what Jürgen Habermas (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  3
    Global Democracy and Feasibility.Eva Erman - forthcoming - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-21.
    While methodological and metatheoretical questions pertaining to feasibility have been intensively discussed in the philosophical literature on feasibility and justice in recent years, these discussions have not permeated the debate on global democracy. The overall aim in this paper is to demonstrate the fruitfulness of importing some of the advancements made in this literature into the debate on global democracy as well as to develop aspects that are relevant for explaining the role of feasibility in normative political theory. This is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  14
    What is ‘Critical’ About Critical Theory?Eva Erman - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (3).
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  33
    Rethinking Accountability in the Context of Human Rights.Eva Erman - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (3):249-275.
    Within liberal democratic theory, ‘democratic accountability’ denotes an aggregative method for linking political decisions to citizens’ preferences through representative institutions. Could such a notion be transferred to the global context of human rights? Various obstacles seem to block such a transfer: there are no ‘world citizens’ as such; many people in need of human rights are not citizens of constitutional democratic states; and the aggregative methods that are supposed to sustain the link are often used in favour of nation-state strategic (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  22
    Multiple Citizenship: Normative Ideals and Institutional Challenges.Eva Erman & Andreas Follesdal - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302.
    Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  14
    The Right to Justification : Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice.Eva Erman - 2012 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 40.
    The Right to Justification : Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  15
    One World, Many Worlds?Eva Erman & Sofia Näsström - 2009 - Ethics and Global Politics 2 (4).
  44.  4
    'Democratic Agents' and 'Agents of Democracy' in Multilayered Governance.Eva Erman - 2012 - In Eva Erman & Ludvig Beckman (eds.), Territories of Citizenship. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 60.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Book Review: The Crisis of the European Union, by Jürgen Habermas.Eva Erman - 2012 - European Political Science 11.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Critical Dialogue: On Goodhart’s Injustice: Political Theory for the Real World. [REVIEW]Eva Erman - forthcoming - Perspectives on Politics 17.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Democratic Requirements and Trade-Offs in a Transnational Context.Eva Erman - 2010 - In E. Erman & A. Uhlin (eds.), Legitimacy Beyond the Nation-State? Palgrave macmillan.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Ethics in a Time of Intensified Globalization.Eva Erman - 2014 - Peace Review 26 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Freedom as Non-Domination.Eva Erman - 2011 - In V. Flocke & H. Schoneville (eds.), Differenz und Dialog. Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag.
  50. In Search for Democratic Agency in Deliberative Governance.Eva Erman - 2013 - European Journal of International Relations 19 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 61