6 found
Order:
See also
Eva Rafetseder
University of Stirling
  1.  15
    Young Children’s Protest: What It Can Tell Us About Early Normative Understanding.Johannes L. Brandl, Frank Esken, Beate Priewasser & Eva Rafetseder - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):719-740.
    In this paper we address the question how children come to understand normativity through simple forms of social interaction. A recent line of research suggests that even very young children can understand social norms quite independently of any moral context. We focus on a methodological procedure developed by Rakoczy et al., Developmental Psychology, 44, 875–881, that measures children’s protest behaviour when a pre-established constitutive rule has been violated. Children seem to protest when they realize that rule violations are not allowed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  20
    When the Alternative Would Have Been Better: Counterfactual Reasoning and the Emergence of Regret.Eva Rafetseder & Josef Perner - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (5):800-819.
  3.  60
    Is Reasoning From Counterfactual Antecedents Evidence for Counterfactual Reasoning?Josef Perner & Eva Rafetseder - 2010 - Thinking and Reasoning 16 (2):131-155.
    In most developmental studies the only error children could make on counterfactual tasks was to answer with the current state of affairs. It was concluded that children who did not show this error are able to reason counterfactually. However, children might have avoided this error by using basic conditional reasoning (Rafetseder, Cristi-Vargas, & Perner, 2010). Basic conditional reasoning takes background assumptions represented as conditionals about how the world works. If an antecedent of one of these conditionals is provided by the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  63
    Basic Conditional Reasoning: How Children Mimic Counterfactual Reasoning.Brian Leahy, Eva Rafetseder & Josef Perner - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (4):793-810.
    Children approach counterfactual questions about stories with a reasoning strategy that falls short of adults’ Counterfactual Reasoning (CFR). It was dubbed “Basic Conditional Reasoning” (BCR) in Rafetseder et al. (Child Dev 81(1):376–389, 2010). In this paper we provide a characterisation of the differences between BCR and CFR using a distinction between permanent and nonpermanent features of stories and Lewis/Stalnaker counterfactual logic. The critical difference pertains to how consistency between a story and a conditional antecedent incompatible with a nonpermanent feature of (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  8
    Erratum To: Young Children’s Protest: What It Can Tell Us About Early Normative Understanding.Johannes L. Brandl, Frank Esken, Beate Priewasser & Eva Rafetseder - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):179-179.
  6.  6
    Of Conditional Reasoning.Josef Perner & Eva Rafetseder - 2011 - In Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Sarah R. Beck (eds.), Understanding Counterfactuals, Understanding Causation. Oxford University Press. pp. 90.