47 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Frederic Gilbert [46]Frédéricand Gilbert [1]
See also
Frederic Gilbert
University of Tasmania
Fred Gilbert
University of Tasmania
  1.  27
    I Miss Being Me: Phenomenological Effects of Deep Brain Stimulation.Frederic Gilbert, Eliza Goddard, John Noel M. Viaña, Adrian Carter & Malcolm Horne - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 8 (2):96-109.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  2.  14
    Deflating the “DBS Causes Personality Changes” Bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - forthcoming - Neuroethics.
    The idea that deep brain stimulation induces changes to personality, identity, agency, authenticity, autonomy and self is so deeply entrenched within neuroethics discourses that it has become an unchallenged narrative. In this article, we critically assess evidence about putative effects of DBS on PIAAAS. We conducted a literature review of more than 1535 articles to investigate the prevalence of scientific evidence regarding these potential DBS-induced changes. While we observed an increase in the number of publications in theoretical neuroethics that mention (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  3.  22
    A Threat to Autonomy? The Intrusion of Predictive Brain Implants.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (4):4-11.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  4.  36
    Deep Brain Stimulation: Inducing Self-Estrangement.Frederic Gilbert - 2018 - Neuroethics 11 (2):157-165.
    Despite growing evidence that a significant number of patients living with Parkison’s disease experience neuropsychiatric changes following Deep Brain Stimulation treatment, the phenomenon remains poorly understood and largely unexplored in the literature. To shed new light on this phenomenon, we used qualitative methods grounded in phenomenology to conduct in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 17 patients living with Parkinson’s Disease who had undergone DBS. Our study found that patients appear to experience postoperative DBS-induced changes in the form of self-estrangement. Using the insights (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5.  14
    The Effects of Closed-Loop Brain Implants on Autonomy and Deliberation: What Are the Risks of Being Kept in the Loop?Frederic Gilbert, Terence O’Brien & Mark Cook - 2018 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 27 (2):316-325.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  6.  71
    The Burden of Normality: From 'Chronically Ill' to 'Symptom Free'. New Ethical Challenges for Deep Brain Stimulation Postoperative Treatment.Frederic Gilbert - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (7):408-412.
    Although an invasive medical intervention, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) has been regarded as an efficient and safe treatment of Parkinson’s disease for the last 20 years. In terms of clinical ethics, it is worth asking whether the use of DBS may have unanticipated negative effects similar to those associated with other types of psychosurgery. Clinical studies of epileptic patients who have undergone an anterior temporal lobectomy have identified a range of side effects and complications in a number of domains: psychological, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  7. Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression: Postoperative Feelings of Self-Estrangement, Suicide Attempt and Impulsive–Aggressive Behaviours.Frederic Gilbert - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (3):473-481.
    The goal of this article is to shed light on Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) postoperative suicidality risk factors within Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) patients, in particular by focusing on the ethical concern of enrolling patient with history of self-estrangement, suicide attempts and impulsive–aggressive inclinations. In order to illustrate these ethical issues we report and review a clinical case associated with postoperative feelings of self-estrangement, self-harm behaviours and suicide attempt leading to the removal of DBS devices. Could prospectively identifying and excluding (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  8.  47
    Self-Estrangement & Deep Brain Stimulation: Ethical Issues Related to Forced Explantation.Frederic Gilbert - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (2):107-114.
    Although being generally safe, the use of Deep Brain Stimulation has been associated with a significant number of patients experiencing postoperative psychological and neurological harm within experimental trials. A proportion of these postoperative severe adverse effects have lead to the decision to medically prescribe device deactivation or removal. However, there is little debate in the literature as to what is in the patient’s best interest when device removal has been prescribed; in particular, what should be the conceptual approach to ethically (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  9.  9
    Deep Brain Stimulation and Postoperative Suicidality Among Treatment Resistant Depression Patients: Should Eligibility Protocols Exclude Patients with a History of Suicide Attempts and Anger/Impulsivity?Frédéric Gilbert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (1):28-35.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  10.  16
    Controlling Brain Cells With Light: Ethical Considerations for Optogenetic Clinical Trials.Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (3):3-11.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  11.  7
    Correction To: Deflating the “DBS Causes Personality Changes” Bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-1.
    Owing to an oversight, we noted that the acknowledgement section was missing from the original published version of this paper.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  12.  7
    A Personal Narrative on Living and Dealing with Psychiatric Symptoms After DBS Surgery.Frédéricand Gilbert & John Noel M. Viaña - 2018 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 8 (1):67-77.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  13.  75
    Involuntary & Voluntary Invasive Brain Surgery: Ethical Issues Related to Acquired Aggressiveness. [REVIEW]Frederic Gilbert, Andrej Vranic & Samia Hurst - 2013 - Neuroethics 6 (1):115-128.
    Clinical cases of frontal lobe lesions have been significantly associated with acquired aggressive behaviour. Restoring neuronal and cognitive faculties of aggressive individuals through invasive brain intervention raises ethical questions in general. However, more questions have to be addressed in cases where individuals refuse surgical treatment. The ethical desirability and permissibility of using intrusive surgical brain interventions for involuntary or voluntary treatment of acquired aggressiveness is highly questionable. This article engages with the description of acquired aggressiveness in general, and presents a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  14.  41
    Print Me an Organ? Ethical and Regulatory Issues Emerging From 3D Bioprinting in Medicine.Frederic Gilbert, Cathal D. O’Connell, Tajanka Mladenovska & Susan Dodds - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):73-91.
    Recent developments of three-dimensional printing of biomaterials in medicine have been portrayed as demonstrating the potential to transform some medical treatments, including providing new responses to organ damage or organ failure. However, beyond the hype and before 3D bioprinted organs are ready to be transplanted into humans, several important ethical concerns and regulatory questions need to be addressed. This article starts by raising general ethical concerns associated with the use of bioprinting in medicine, then it focuses on more particular ethical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15.  13
    Thinking Ahead Too Much: Speculative Ethics and Implantable Brain Devices.Frederic Gilbert & Eliza Goddard - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (1):49-51.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  16.  6
    An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use.Frederic Gilbert, Brown, Dasgupta, Martens, Klein & Goering - forthcoming - Neuroethics.
    One important concern regarding implantable Brain Computer Interfaces is the fear that the intervention will negatively change a patient’s sense of identity or agency. In particular, there is concern that the user will be psychologically worse-off following treatment despite postoperative functional improvements. Clinical observations from similar implantable brain technologies, such as deep brain stimulation, show a small but significant proportion of patients report feelings of strangeness or difficulty adjusting to a new concept of themselves characterized by a maladaptive je ne (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  17.  3
    An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use.Frederic Gilbert, Brown, Dasgupta, Martens, Klein & Goering - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-8.
    One important concern regarding implantable Brain Computer Interfaces is the fear that the intervention will negatively change a patient’s sense of identity or agency. In particular, there is concern that the user will be psychologically worse-off following treatment despite postoperative functional improvements. Clinical observations from similar implantable brain technologies, such as deep brain stimulation, show a small but significant proportion of patients report feelings of strangeness or difficulty adjusting to a new concept of themselves characterized by a maladaptive je ne (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  18.  17
    Is a ‘Last Chance’ Treatment Possible After an Irreversible Brain Intervention?Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris, Susan Dodds & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 6 (2):W1-W2.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19.  3
    An Instrument to Capture the Phenomenology of Implantable Brain Device Use.Frederic Gilbert, Brown, Dasgupta, Martens, Klein & Goering - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-8.
    One important concern regarding implantable Brain Computer Interfaces is the fear that the intervention will negatively change a patient’s sense of identity or agency. In particular, there is concern that the user will be psychologically worse-off following treatment despite postoperative functional improvements. Clinical observations from similar implantable brain technologies, such as deep brain stimulation, show a small but significant proportion of patients report feelings of strangeness or difficulty adjusting to a new concept of themselves characterized by a maladaptive je ne (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  20
    Paedophilia, Invasive Brain Surgery, and Punishment.Frederic Gilbert & Andrej Vranič - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (3):521-526.
  21.  46
    Deep Brain Stimulation in the Media: Over-Optimistic Media Portrayals Calls for a New Strategy Involving Journalists and Scientifics in the Ethical Debate.Frederic Gilbert & Ovadia Daniela - 2011 - Journal of Integrative in Neuroscience 5 (16).
    Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is optimistically portrayed in contemporary media. This already happened with psychosurgery during the first half of the twentieth century. The tendency of popular media to hype the benefits of DBS therapies, without equally highlighting risks, fosters public expectations also due to the lack of ethical analysis in the scientific literature. Media are not expected (and often not prepared) to raise the ethical issues which remain unaddressed by the scientific community. To obtain a more objective portrayal of (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  22.  9
    Correction To: Deflating the “DBS Causes Personality Changes” Bubble.Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña & C. Ineichen - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-1.
    The article Deflating the "DBS causes personality changes" bubble, written by Frederic Gilbert, J. N. M. Viaña and C. Ineichen, was originally published electronically on the publisher’s internet portal on 19 June 2018 without open access.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  24
    Efficacy Testing as a Primary Purpose of Phase 1 Clinical Trials: Is It Applicable to First-in-Human Bionics and Optogenetics Trials?Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Robert M. I. Kapsa - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (2):20-22.
    In her article, Pascale Hess raises the issue of whether her proposed model may be extrapolated and applied to clinical research fields other than stem cell-based interventions in the brain (SCBI-B) (Hess 2012). Broadly summarized, Hess’s model suggests prioritizing efficacy over safety in phase 1 trials involving irreversible interventions in the brain, when clinical criteria meet the appropriate population suffering from “degenerative brain diseases” (Hess 2012). Although there is a need to reconsider the traditional phase 1 model, especially with respect (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  24.  60
    The Impact of American Tackle Football-Related Concussion in Youth Athletes.Frédéric Gilbert & L. Syd M. Johnson - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):48-59.
    Postmortem research on the brains of American tackle football players has revealed the presence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a degenerative brain disease caused by repeated head trauma. Repeated concussion is a risk factor for CTE, raising ethical concerns about the long-term effects of concussion on athletes at risk for football-related concussion. Of equal concern is that youth athletes are at increased risk for lasting neurocognitive and developmental deficits that can result in behavioral disturbances and diminished academic performance. In this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  25.  6
    Of Meatballs And Invasive Neurotechnological Trials: Additional Considerations for Complex Clinical Decisions.John Noel M. Viaña, Adrian Carter & Frederic Gilbert - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 9 (2):100-104.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  55
    Is There a Moral Obligation to Develop Brain Implants Involving NanoBionic Technologies? Ethical Issues for Clinical Trials.Frédéric Gilbert & Susan Dodds - 2014 - NanoEthics 8 (1):49-56.
    In their article published in Nanoethics, “Ethical, Legal and Social Aspects of Brain-Implants Using Nano-Scale Materials and Techniques”, Berger et al. suggest that there may be a prima facie moral obligation to improve neuro implants with nanotechnology given their possible therapeutic advantages for patients [Nanoethics, 2:241–249]. Although we agree with Berger et al. that developments in nanomedicine hold the potential to render brain implant technologies less invasive and to better target neural stimulation to respond to brain impairments in the near (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27.  5
    Incoming Ethical Issues for Deep Brain Stimulation: When Long-Term Treatment Leads to a ‘New Form of the Disease’.Frederic Gilbert & Mathilde Lancelot - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (1):20-25.
    Deep brain stimulation has been regarded as an efficient and safe treatment for Parkinson’s disease since being approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1997. It is estimated that more than 150 000 patients have been implanted, with a forecasted rapid increase in uptake with population ageing. Recent longitudinal follow-up studies have reported a significant increase in postoperative survival rates of patients with PD implanted with DBS as compared with those not implanted with DBS. Although DBS tends to increase (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  2
    Burnt in Your Memory or Burnt Memory? Ethical Issues with Optogenetics for Memory Modification.Frederic Gilbert, Alexander R. Harris & Michael Kidd - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 12 (1):22-24.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29.  38
    Target Populations for First-In-Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in Spinal Cord Injury.Frederic Bretzner, Frederic Gilbert, Françoise Baylis & Robert M. Brownstone - 2011 - Cell Stem Cell 8 (5):468-475.
    Geron recently announced that it had begun enrolling patients in the world's first-in-human clinical trial involving cells derived from human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). This trial raises important questions regarding the future of hESC-based therapies, especially in spinal cord injury (SCI) patients. We address some safety and efficacy concerns with this research, as well as the ethics of fair subject selection. We consider other populations that might be better for this research: chronic complete SCI patients for a safety trial, subacute (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30.  26
    Framing the Debate: Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.L. Syd M. Johnson, Brad Partridge & Frédéric Gilbert - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (1):1-4.
    Concussion and Mild Traumatic Brain Injury affect millions of people worldwide. mTBI has been called the “signature injury” of the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, affecting thousands of active duty service men and women, and veterans. Sport-related concussion represents a significant public health problem, with elite and professional athletes, and millions of youth and amateur athletes worldwide suffering concussions annually. These brain injuries have received scant attention from neuroethicists, and the focus of this special issue is on defining the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  19
    The Need to Tackle Concussion in Australian Football Codes.Frederic Gilbert & Bradley J. Partridge - 2012 - Medical Journal of Australia 196 (9):561-563.
    Postmortem evidence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) in the brains of American National Football League players who suffered concussions while playing have intensified concerns about the risks of concussion in sport.1 Concussions are frequently sustained by amateur and professional players of Australia’s three most popular football codes (Australian football, rugby league, and rugby union) and, to a lesser extent, other contact sports such as soccer. This raises major concerns about possible long-term neurological damage, cognitive impairment and mental health problems in (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32.  22
    How to Turn Ethical Neglect Into Ethical Approval.Frédéric Gilbert & Susan Dodds - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 4 (2):59-60.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  18
    Beyond Genomic Association: Ethical Implications of Elucidating Disease Mechanisms and Genotype-Influenced Treatment Response.John Noel M. Viaña, Roemel Jeusep Bueno & Frederic Gilbert - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (4):24-26.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  17
    Acquired Pedophilia and Moral Responsibility.Frederic Gilbert, Andrej Vranic & John Noel M. Viaña - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (4):209-211.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  13
    Big Explanations for Big Expectations: Deriving Lessons From the Human Genome and Blue Brain Projects.John Noel M. Viaña & Frederic Gilbert - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (1):18-20.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  34
    Neuroenhancement: Much Ado About Nothing?Frédéric Gilbert & Bernard Baertschi - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):45-47.
    In their paper “Deflating the neuroenhancement bubble”, more precisely in their section entitled “How New is Neuroenhancement?”, Lucke and colleagues argue that neuroenhancement is nothing new to our epoch by demonstrating that the use of psychoactive stimulants in the 19th and 20th centuries was already common. The purpose of our comment is to show that the current bubble surrounding neuroenhancement in particular, and enhancement in general, is a recasting of an even older speculative engagement that can be traced back from (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  37.  13
    Just Another Spot? How to Miss the Ethical Target.Frederic Gilbert - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 5 (4):85-87.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  12
    State of the Concussion Debate: From Sceptical to Alarmist Claims.Frédéric Gilbert - 2015 - Neuroethics 8 (1):47-53.
    Current discussions about concussion in sport are based on a crucial epistemological question: whether or not we should believe that repetitive mild Traumatic Brain Injury causes Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy. This epistemological question is essential to understanding the ethics at stake in treating these cases: indeed, certain moral obligations turn on whether or not we believe that mTBI causes CTE. After discussing the main schools of thought, namely the CTE-sceptic position and the CTE-orthodox position, this article examines the concussion debate in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  36
    Working While Under the Influence of Performance-Enhancing Drugs: Is One “More Responsible”?Frederic Gilbert - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (3):57-59.
    The purpose of this commentary is to address an ethical issue introduced by Walter Glannon regarding whether responsibility can be affected by the use of performance enhancing drugs. Glannon uses the example of a surgeon taking drugs to enhance her capacities. I explore whether conducting surgeries while under the influence of performance enhancing drugs will affect the surgeon’s responsibility for performing more surgeries ‘and’ the surgeon’s responsibility for assuming the consequences of performing these surgeries. Here, the ‘and’ is cumulative: one (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  6
    Deflating the Deep Brain Stimulation Causes Personality Changes Bubble: The Authors Reply.Frederic Gilbert, John Noel M. Viana & C. Ineichen - forthcoming - Neuroethics:1-12.
    To conclude that there is enough or not enough evidence demonstrating that deep brain stimulation causes unintended postoperative personality changes is an epistemic problem that should be answered on the basis of established, replicable, and valid data. If prospective DBS recipients delay or refuse to be implanted because they are afraid of suffering from personality changes following DBS, and their fears are based on unsubstantiated claims made in the neuroethics literature, then researchers making these claims bear great responsibility for prospective (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  27
    Enthusiastic Portrayal of 3D Bioprinting in the Media: Ethical Side Effects.Frederic Gilbert, John Noel M. Viaña, Cathal D. O'Connell & Susan Dodds - 2018 - Bioethics 32 (2):94-102.
    There has been a surge in mass media reports extolling the potential for using three-dimensional printing of biomaterials to treat a wide range of clinical conditions. Given that mass media is recognized as one of the most important sources of health and medical information for the general public, especially prospective patients, we report and discuss the ethical consequences of coverage of 3D bioprinting in the media. First, we illustrate how positive mass media narratives of a similar biofabricated technology, namely the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  67
    The Inheritance, Power and Predicaments of the “Brain-Reading” Metaphor.Frederic Gilbert, Lawrence Burns & Timothy Krahn - 2011 - Medicine Studies 2 (4):229-244.
    Purpose With the increasing sophistication of neuroimaging technologies in medicine, new language is being sought to make sense of the findings. The aim of this paper is to explore whether the brain-reading metaphor used to convey current medical or neurobiological findings imports unintended significations that do not necessarily reflect the genuine findings made by physicians and neuroscientists. Methods First, the paper surveys the ambiguities of the readability metaphor, drawing from the history of science and medicine, paying special attention to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  9
    ¿Cómo Entran En Conflicto Las Responsabilidades de Un Investigador Con Los Derechos de Los Aborígenes? Problemas En Investigación Genética y Biobancos En Taiwán.Mark Munsterhjelm & Frederic Gilbert - 2010 - Dilemata 4.
    Taiwan has a population of 23 million, of which some 500,000 are Aborigines. Recent conflicts over a national biobank as part of Taiwan's biotechnological industrial development, genetic research on Aboriginal origins, and commercialization of research findings involving Aborigines have raised a number of important ethical conflicts. These ethical conflicts involve on one hand, the importance of researchers' duties, and on the other hand, Aboriginal rights. This paper will go in three steps. First, this paper describes the three cases of ethical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  47
    How Do Research Duties Conflict with Aboriginal Rights? Genetics Research and Biobank Problem in Taiwan.Mark Munsterhjelm & Frederic Gilbert - 2010 - Dilemata 2 (4):33-56.
    Taiwan has a population of 23 million, of which some 500,000 are Aborigines. Recent conflicts over a national biobank as part of Taiwan's biotechnological industrial development, genetic research on Aboriginal origins, and commercialization of research findings involving Aborigines have raised a number of important ethical conflicts. These ethical conflicts involve on one hand, the importance of researchers' duties, and on the other hand, Aboriginal rights. This paper will go in three steps. First, this paper describes the three cases of ethical (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  2
    Ethical Examination of Deep Brain Stimulation’s ‘Last Resort’ Status.Ian Stevens & Frederic Gilbert - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics:medethics-2020-106609.
    Deep brain stimulation interventions are novel devices being investigated for the management of severe treatment-resistant psychiatric illnesses. These interventions require the invasive implantation of high-frequency neurostimulatory probes intracranially aiming to provide symptom relief in treatment-resistant disorders including obsessive-compulsive disorder and anorexia nervosa. In the scientific literature, these neurostimulatory interventions are commonly described as reversible and to be used as a last resort option for psychiatric patients. However, the ‘last resort’ status of these interventions is rarely expanded upon. Contrastingly, usages of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  10
    Decoded Neurofeedback: Eligibility, Applicability, and Reliability Issues for Use in Schizophrenia and Major Depressive Disorder.John Noel M. Viaña, Lorena Freitas, Mario Carlo Severo & Frederic Gilbert - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 7 (2):127-129.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  23
    32 Shades of Neuroethics—A Review of the Routledge Handbook of Neuroethics, Edited by L. Syd M Johnson and Karen S. Rommelfanger1.John Noel M. Viaña & Frederic Gilbert - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):1-3.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark