Results for 'Fran��ois H. Lapointe'

999 found
Order:
  1.  2
    Heidegger and Practical Philosophy.Fran?ois Raffoul & David Pettigrew (eds.) - 2002 - State University of New York Press.
    Leading scholars address the ethical and practical dimensions of Heidegger's thought.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  2.  3
    General Theory of Victims.Fran?ois Laruelle - 2015 - Polity.
    The most accessible expression of François Laruelles non-philosophical, or non-standard, thought, _General Theory of Victims_ forges a new role for contemporary philosophers and intellectuals by rethinking their relation to victims. A key text in recent continental philosophy, it is indispensable for anyone interested in the debates surrounding materialism, philosophy of religion, and ethics. Transforming Joseph de Maistres adage that the executioner is the cornerstone of society, _General Theory of Victims_ instead proposes the victim as the cornerstone of humanity and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Utilitarisme et écologie sont-ils réconciliables?Fran‡ois Blais - 1998 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (3):449-452.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Jean-Fran^ Ois Lyotard.Stefan Lange - 2004 - In Gisela Riescher (ed.), Politische Theorie der Gegenwart in Einzeldarstellungen. Von Adorno Bis Young. Alfred Kröner Verlag. pp. 343--305.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  7
    The Pheromonal Role of Cuticular Hydrocarbons inDrosophila Melanogaster.Jean-Fran�ois Ferveur - 1997 - Bioessays 19 (4):353-358.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. Michael Bacharach, Kenneth Binmore, Steven Brams, David Gauthier, Peter Hammond, John Harsanyi, Aiain Haurie, Alan Kirman, David Kreps, Jean-Jacaues Laffont, Jean-Fran~; ois Mertens, Fioravante Patrone, Ariel Rubinstein, Piero Tani, Stephanus Tij $.Centro Interuniversitario di Teoria Dei Giochi & E. Applicazioni - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (378).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  14
    Rezension: Medizin und Pharmazie in Bern. Eine Zeitreise von Ingrid Müller-Landgraf und Fran?ois Ledermann.Fritz Krafft - 2003 - Berichte Zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte 26 (3):232-232.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  1
    22. The Flaghaug Burials.Håkon Reiersen & Frans-Arne H. Stylegar - 2017 - In Dagfinn Skre (ed.), Avaldsnes - a Sea-Kings' Manor in First-Millennium Western Scandinavia. De Gruyter. pp. 551-638.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  1
    Edmund Husserl and His Critics, an International Bibliography (1894-1979): Preceded by a Bibliography of Husserl's Writings.François H. Lapointe & François Lapointe - 1980 - Bowling Green, Ohio : Philosophy Documentation Center, Bowling Green State University.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Di Pietro) 410.J. A. De Vito, P. H. Reaney, Claude Lapointe, Rodney D. Huddleston, Giorgio Tagliacozzo & Hayden V. White - 1973 - Foundations of Language 9:444.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  16
    The Multiple Faces of Practical Wisdom in Complex Clinical Practices: An Empirical Exploration.Marij C. M. L. Bontemps-Hommen, Frans J. H. Vosman & Andries J. Baart - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26 (3):1034-1041.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  10
    Jean-Paul Sartre's Marxism—A Bibliographic Essay.Francois H. Lapointe & Claire C. Lapointe - 1974 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 5 (2):184-192.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  4
    Herbert Marcuse and His Critics: A Bibliographic Essay.François H. Lapointe & Claire Lapointe - 1975 - International Studies in Philosophy 7:183-196.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  5
    Herbert Marcuse and His Critics: A Bibliographic Essay.François H. Lapointe & Claire Lapointe - 1975 - International Studies in Philosophy 7:183-196.
  15. Thomas More Academie. [REVIEW]Frans J. H. Vosman - 1990 - Moreana 27 (3):84-84.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  57
    Catholic Healthcare Organizations and How They Can Contribute to Solidarity: A Social-Ethical Account of Catholic Identity.Martien A. M. Pijnenburg, Bert Gordijn, Frans J. H. Vosman & Henk A. M. J. Ten Have - 2010 - Christian Bioethics 16 (3):314-333.
    Solidarity belongs to the basic principles of Catholic Social Teaching (CST) and is part of the ethical repertoire of European moral traditions and European healthcare systems. This paper discusses how leaders of Catholic healthcare organizations (HCOs) can understand their institutional moral responsibility with regard to the preservation of solidarity. In dealing with this question, we make use of Taylor's philosophy of modern culture. We first argue that, just as all HCOs, Catholic ones also can embody and strengthen solidarity by just (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  17.  7
    A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book two of the leading figures in argumentation theory present a view of argumentation as a means of resolving differences of opinion by testing the acceptability of the disputed positions. Their model of a 'critical discussion' serves as a theoretical tool for analysing, evaluating and producing argumentative discourse. They develop a method for the reconstruction of argumentative discourse that takes into account all aspects that are relevant to a critical assessment. They also propose a practical code of behaviour (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   100 citations  
  18.  60
    Catholic Healthcare Organizations and the Articulation of Their Identity.Martien A. M. Pijnenburg, Bert Gordijn, Frans J. H. Vosman & Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2008 - HEC Forum 20 (1):75-97.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  12
    Boekbesprekingen.W. Beuken, P. Fransen, J. De Fraine, J. -M. Tison, J. Vanneste, P. van Doornik, J. Rupert, P. Grootens, J. Verhaeghe, S. Trooster, St Raes, M. Chappin, A. van Kol, A. Thiadens, L. Braeckmans, M. De Wachter, Jos Vercruysse, A. Houben, William McMahon, Alph Houben, H. Robbers, Frans Vandenbussche, H. Somers, R. Hostie, Cl Beukers & P. Penning de Vries - 1966 - Bijdragen 27 (3):427-464.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  13
    Boekbesprekingen.J.-M. Tison, B. Van Dorpe, Alph Houben, P. Fransen, P. Verdeyen, P. Smulders, Leo Bakker, J. Mulders, L. De Valkeneer, H. Van Luijk, M. Prick, M. De Tollenaere, J. Kijm, H. Robbers, Frans Vandenbussche, H. Somers, P. Grootens, P. Van Doornik & L. Bakker - 1967 - Bijdragen 28 (2):212-232.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  59
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.
  22.  8
    Incorporation of Economic Evidence in the Dutch Guideline 'Cardiovascular Risk Management'.Siok Swan Tan, Frans F. H. Rutten & Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1094-1101.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  27
    Boekbesprekingen.Th C. de Kruijf, P. Fransen, H. van Leeuwen, F. J. Theunis, Jos Vercruysse, R. G. W. Huysmans, A. Baekelandt, Frans Vandenbussche, H. P. M. Goddijn & J. G. Platvoet - 1974 - Bijdragen 35 (3-4):426-446.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  71
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
    In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  25. For Reason’s Sake: Maximal Argumentative Analysis of Discourse.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  26.  9
    Examining Argumentative Style.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):8-25.
    In this theoretical expose, it is argued that the notion of argumentative style is more encompassing and at the same time more specific than the more familiar notion of linguistic style. According to van Eemeren, argumentative styles always have three dimensions: the selection of standpoints, starting-points, arguments or other argumentative moves, the adjustment of argumentative moves to the frame of reference and preferences of the listeners or readers, and the choice of verbal or non-verbal means for advancing argumentative moves. In (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  27. Argumentation Studies’ Five Estates.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  28.  74
    Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, a taxonomy is proposed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  29. Democracy and Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  30.  76
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
    According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  31. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  32.  62
    The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.Frans H. Eemeren - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
    During the past thirty years the pragma-dialectical theorizing has developed in various steps from designing an abstract ideal model for critical discussion to examining strategic manoeuvring in the various argumentative activity types in which argumentative discourse manifests itself in argumentative reality. The response to the theoretical proposals that have been made includes, next to approval, also various kinds of criticisms. This paper explores the nature and thrust of these criticisms. In doing so, a distinction is made between criticisms concerning the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  33.  20
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  34. The Pragma-Dialectical Method of Analysis and Evaluation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  35. From Ideal Model of Critical Discussion to Situated Argumentative Discourse: The Step-by-Step Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  36. The Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation Under Discussion.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  37.  40
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory: Twenty Exploratory Studies.Mark Aakhus - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (4):489-492.
    Every 4 years, for the past three decades, the world of argumentation research has gathered in Amsterdam at the International Society for the Study of Argumentation conferences to explore advances in understanding argumentation and how argumentation advances our understanding of the human condition. While comprehensive proceedings of selected papers are produced to document what has transpired in the world of argumentation over the preceding 4 years, there remains the important matter of taking the intellectual pulse of the world’s argumentation scholars, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  19
    Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
    The book offers a compact but comprehensive introductory overview of the crucial components of argumentation theory. In presenting this overview, argumentation is consistently approached from a pragma-dialectical perspective by viewing it pragmatically as a goal-directed communicative activity and dialectically as part of a regulated critical exchange aimed at resolving a difference of opinion. As a result, the book also systematically explains how the constitutive parts of the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation, which are discussed in a number of separate publications, hang (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  39.  44
    Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
    The introduction of the concept of strategic maneuvering into the pragma-dialectical theory makes it possible to formulate testable hypotheses regarding the persuasiveness of argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse. After summarizing the standard pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, van Eemeren, Garssen, and Meuffels explain what the extension of the pragma-dialectical approach with strategic maneuvering involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  40.  1
    Frans H. Van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Nanon Labrie: Argumentation Between Doctors and Patients: Understanding Clinical Argumentative Discourse.Lei Zhu & Wei Wang - forthcoming - Argumentation:1-6.
    The latest book is a timely application of the Pragma-Dialectical argumentative approach to medical consultation. The book consists of six chapters, which are concerned with topics pertaining to resolving differences of the opinion in doctor-patient interaction. With the publication of the book, the authors have made new contributions to the field of doctor-patient argumentative discourse.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  6
    Six Related Essays on Argumentative Style.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):1-7.
    This introduction to the special issue devoted to argumentative style describes the way in which this collection of six papers came about. It recapitulates the main thrust of the issues that are included. All authors share the pragma-dialectical perspective on argumentative style set forth in the first contribution, in which argumentative style is connected with strategic manoeuvring. In analysing argumentative styles, they concentrate on different kinds of argumentative discourses and have a different emphasis in carrying out their analyses.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  17
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse: Fifty Contributions to the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
    Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal communicative moves.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  43.  27
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
  44. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  45.  56
    Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
    In this article it is pointed out what kind of rules for communication and argumentation are required in order to make it possible to resolve disputes in an orderly way. In section 2, Gricean maxims and Searlean speech act conditions are integrated in such a way that five general rules for communication can be formulated. In section 3, starting from Lewis's definition of convention, it is argued that the interactional effect of accepting is conventionally linked with the complex communicative act (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  46.  17
    Frans H. Van Eemeren: Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, 2018, Volume 33 of the Argumentation Library, 193 Pp, ISBN: 1566-7650.Peng Wu - 2018 - Argumentation 32 (4):609-614.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. Fallacies as Derailments of Argumentative Discourse Acceptance Based on Understanding and Critical Assessment.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48. In Reasonableness.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  49. The Role of Logic in Analyzing and Evaluating Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50.  16
    Editors' Introduction.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):137-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
1 — 50 / 999