Results for 'Fran��ois H. Lapointe'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Utilitarisme et écologie sont-ils réconciliables?Fran‡ois Blais - 1998 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (3):449-452.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Intellectuals and Power.Fran?ois Laruelle - 2014 - Polity.
    In this important new book, the leading philosopher François Laruelle examines the role of intellectuals in our societies today, specifically with regards to criminal justice. He argues that, rather than concerning themselves with abstract philosophical notions like justice, truth and violence, intellectuals should focus on the human victims. Drawing on his influential theory of ‘non-philosophy’, he shows how we can submit the theorizing of intellectuals to the scrutiny of the everyday suffering of the victims of crime. In the course of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Jean-Fran^ Ois Lyotard.Stefan Lange - 2004 - In Gisela Riescher (ed.), Politische Theorie der Gegenwart in Einzeldarstellungen. Von Adorno Bis Young. Alfred Kröner Verlag. pp. 343--305.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  7
    The Pheromonal Role of Cuticular Hydrocarbons inDrosophila Melanogaster.Jean-Fran�ois Ferveur - 1997 - Bioessays 19 (4):353-358.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  56
    The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.Frans H. Eemeren - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
    During the past thirty years the pragma-dialectical theorizing has developed in various steps from designing an abstract ideal model for critical discussion to examining strategic manoeuvring in the various argumentative activity types in which argumentative discourse manifests itself in argumentative reality. The response to the theoretical proposals that have been made includes, next to approval, also various kinds of criticisms. This paper explores the nature and thrust of these criticisms. In doing so, a distinction is made between criticisms concerning the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  6.  14
    The Multiple Faces of Practical Wisdom in Complex Clinical Practices: An Empirical Exploration.Marij C. M. L. Bontemps-Hommen, Frans J. H. Vosman & Andries J. Baart - 2020 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 26 (3):1034-1041.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  24
    Argumentative Style: A Complex Notion.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (2):153-171.
    This theoretical expose explores the complex notion of argumentative style, which has so far been largely neglected in argumentation theory. After an introduction of the problems involved, the theoretical tools for identifying the properties of the discourse in which an argumentative style manifests itself are explained from a pragma-dialectical perspective and a theoretical definition of argumentative style is provided that does full justice to its role in argumentative discourse. The article concludes with a short reflection upon the next steps that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  8.  49
    Catholic Healthcare Organizations and How They Can Contribute to Solidarity: A Social-Ethical Account of Catholic Identity.Martien A. M. Pijnenburg, Bert Gordijn, Frans J. H. Vosman & Henk A. M. J. Ten Have - 2010 - Christian Bioethics 16 (3):314-333.
    Solidarity belongs to the basic principles of Catholic Social Teaching (CST) and is part of the ethical repertoire of European moral traditions and European healthcare systems. This paper discusses how leaders of Catholic healthcare organizations (HCOs) can understand their institutional moral responsibility with regard to the preservation of solidarity. In dealing with this question, we make use of Taylor's philosophy of modern culture. We first argue that, just as all HCOs, Catholic ones also can embody and strengthen solidarity by just (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  1
    22. The Flaghaug Burials.Håkon Reiersen & Frans-Arne H. Stylegar - 2017 - In Dagfinn Skre (ed.), Avaldsnes - a Sea-Kings' Manor in First-Millennium Western Scandinavia. De Gruyter. pp. 551-638.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  14
    Rezension: Medizin und Pharmazie in Bern. Eine Zeitreise von Ingrid Müller-Landgraf und Fran?ois Ledermann.Fritz Krafft - 2003 - Berichte Zur Wissenschafts-Geschichte 26 (3):232-232.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation: John Benjamins Publishing Company, Argumentation in Context , Vol. 2, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, 2010, XII + 308 Pp. [REVIEW]Eddo Rigotti - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):261-270.
  12. Michael Bacharach, Kenneth Binmore, Steven Brams, David Gauthier, Peter Hammond, John Harsanyi, Aiain Haurie, Alan Kirman, David Kreps, Jean-Jacaues Laffont, Jean-Fran~; ois Mertens, Fioravante Patrone, Ariel Rubinstein, Piero Tani, Stephanus Tij $.Centro Interuniversitario di Teoria Dei Giochi & E. Applicazioni - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (378).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  67
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):283-301.
    In the pragma-dialectical approach, fallacies are considered incorrect moves in a discussion for which the goal is successful resolution of a dispute. Ten rules are given for effective conduct at the various stages of such a critical discussion (confrontation, opening, argumentation, concluding). Fallacies are discussed as violations of these rules, taking into account all speech acts which are traditionally recognized as fallacies. Special attention is paid to the role played by implicitness in fallacies in everyday language use. It is stressed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  14. Di Pietro) 410.J. A. De Vito, P. H. Reaney, Claude Lapointe, Rodney D. Huddleston, Giorgio Tagliacozzo & Hayden V. White - 1973 - Foundations of Language 9:444.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  4
    Herbert Marcuse and His Critics: A Bibliographic Essay.François H. Lapointe & Claire Lapointe - 1975 - International Studies in Philosophy 7:183-196.
  16.  4
    Herbert Marcuse and His Critics: A Bibliographic Essay.François H. Lapointe & Claire Lapointe - 1975 - International Studies in Philosophy 7:183-196.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  10
    Jean-Paul Sartre's Marxism—A Bibliographic Essay.Francois H. Lapointe & Claire C. Lapointe - 1974 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 5 (2):184-192.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  72
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
    According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  19.  44
    Effectiveness Through Reasonableness Preliminary Steps to Pragma-Dialectical Effectiveness Research.Frans H. Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):33-53.
    The introduction of the concept of strategic maneuvering into the pragma-dialectical theory makes it possible to formulate testable hypotheses regarding the persuasiveness of argumentative moves that are made in argumentative discourse. After summarizing the standard pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, van Eemeren, Garssen, and Meuffels explain what the extension of the pragma-dialectical approach with strategic maneuvering involves and discuss the fallacies in terms of the extended pragma-dialectical approach as derailments of strategic maneuvering. Then they give an empirical interpretation of the extended (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  72
    Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, a taxonomy is proposed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  21.  3
    Examining Argumentative Style.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2021 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 10 (1):8-25.
    In this theoretical expose, it is argued that the notion of argumentative style is more encompassing and at the same time more specific than the more familiar notion of linguistic style. According to van Eemeren, argumentative styles always have three dimensions: the selection of standpoints, starting-points, arguments or other argumentative moves, the adjustment of argumentative moves to the frame of reference and preferences of the listeners or readers, and the choice of verbal or non-verbal means for advancing argumentative moves. In (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  22.  20
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  23. Bingo! Promising Developments in Argumentation Theory.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  24.  26
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
  25.  52
    Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1988 - Argumentation 2 (4):499-510.
    In this article it is pointed out what kind of rules for communication and argumentation are required in order to make it possible to resolve disputes in an orderly way. In section 2, Gricean maxims and Searlean speech act conditions are integrated in such a way that five general rules for communication can be formulated. In section 3, starting from Lewis's definition of convention, it is argued that the interactional effect of accepting is conventionally linked with the complex communicative act (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  26. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
  27.  7
    Incorporation of Economic Evidence in the Dutch Guideline 'Cardiovascular Risk Management'.Siok Swan Tan, Frans F. H. Rutten & Leona Hakkaart-van Roijen - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1094-1101.
  28.  13
    Boekbesprekingen.J.-M. Tison, B. Van Dorpe, Alph Houben, P. Fransen, P. Verdeyen, P. Smulders, Leo Bakker, J. Mulders, L. De Valkeneer, H. Van Luijk, M. Prick, M. De Tollenaere, J. Kijm, H. Robbers, Frans Vandenbussche, H. Somers, P. Grootens, P. Van Doornik & L. Bakker - 1967 - Bijdragen 28 (2):212-232.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  48
    In Context: Giving Contextualization its Rightful Place in the Study of Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (2):141-161.
    ‘In Context’ is aimed at giving contextualization its rightful place in the study of argumentation. First, Frans H. van Eemeren explains the crucial role of context in a reconstructive analysis of argumentative discourse. He distinguishes four levels of contextualization. Second, he situates his approach to context in the field of argumentation studies by comparing it with Walton’s approach. He emphasizes the importance of distinguishing clearly between a normatively motivated theoretical ideal model and empirically-based communicative activity types. Third, van Eemeren concentrates (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  30.  12
    Boekbesprekingen.W. Beuken, P. Fransen, J. De Fraine, J. -M. Tison, J. Vanneste, P. van Doornik, J. Rupert, P. Grootens, J. Verhaeghe, S. Trooster, St Raes, M. Chappin, A. van Kol, A. Thiadens, L. Braeckmans, M. De Wachter, Jos Vercruysse, A. Houben, William McMahon, Alph Houben, H. Robbers, Frans Vandenbussche, H. Somers, R. Hostie, Cl Beukers & P. Penning de Vries - 1966 - Bijdragen 27 (3):427-464.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  21
    A Bibliography of Jean-Paul Sartre's Philosophy.Francois H. Lapointe - 1972 - Man and World 5 (2):193.
  32.  59
    Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
    The paper reacts against the strict separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentation and argues that argumentative discourse can be analyzed and evaluated more adequately if the two are systematically combined. Such an integrated approach makes it possible to show how the opportunities available in each of the dialectical stages of a critical discussion have been used strategically to further the rhetorical aims of the speaker or writer. The approach is illustrated with the help of an analysis of an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  33.  60
    Catholic Healthcare Organizations and the Articulation of Their Identity.Martien A. M. Pijnenburg, Bert Gordijn, Frans J. H. Vosman & Henk A. M. J. ten Have - 2008 - HEC Forum 20 (1):75-97.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  15
    The Anglo-American Response to Edmund Husserl: A Bibliographic Essay. [REVIEW]FranÇois H. Lapointe - 1979 - Man and World 12 (2):205.
  35.  16
    Editors' Introduction.Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):137-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  36.  16
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal communicative moves.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  37.  6
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Tjark Kruiger, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  38.  9
    Claude Lévi-Strauss: A Bibliographic Essay.FranÇois H. Lapointe - 1973 - Man and World 6 (4):445.
  39.  22
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 271-291.
  40.  8
    Supplement to Bibliography on Jean-Paul Sartre.François H. Lapointe - 1981 - Man and World 14 (1):77.
  41.  14
    Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  42.  60
    The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
    This paper describes the development of pragma-dialectics as a theory of argumentative discourse. First the development of the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is explained, with the rules that are to be complied with in order to avoid fallacies from occurring. Then the integration is discussed of rhetorical insight in the dialectical framework. In this endeavour, the concept of strategic manoeuvring is explained that allows for a more refined and more profoundly justified analysis of argumentative discourse and a better (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  43.  8
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  44.  30
    Frans H. Van Eemeren: Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Extending the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Karen Tracy - 2012 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 1 (2):253-258.
  45.  27
    Boekbesprekingen.Th C. de Kruijf, P. Fransen, H. van Leeuwen, F. J. Theunis, Jos Vercruysse, R. G. W. Huysmans, A. Baekelandt, Frans Vandenbussche, H. P. M. Goddijn & J. G. Platvoet - 1974 - Bijdragen 35 (3-4):426-446.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  57
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Peter Houtlosser (Eds.) (2002). Dialectic and Rhetoric: The Warp and Woof of Argumentation Analysis. [REVIEW]R. H. Johnson - 2004 - Argumentation 18 (4):483-488.
  47.  1
    Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1999 - Discourse Studies 1 (4):479-497.
    This article reacts against the undesirable ideological separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentative discourse. It argues that a sound evaluation of argumentation requires an analysis that reveals all aspects of the discourse pertinent to critical testing. To explain the rationale of the various moves made in the discourse and the strategic patterns behind them, not only the interlocutors' dialectical goals must be taken into account, but also their rhetorical goals. After explaining how rhetorical insight can be instrumental in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   68 citations  
  48.  9
    The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 161-177.
  49.  36
    Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):1-23.
    This paper serves as an introduction to the special issue on argumentative patterns in discourse, more in particular on argumentative patterns with pragmatic argumentation as a main argument that are prototypical of argumentative discourse in certain communicative activity types in the political, the legal, the medical, and the academic domain. It situates the studies of argumentative patterns reported in these papers in the pragma-dialectical research program. In order to be able to do so, it is first explained in which consecutive (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  50.  40
    A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
    According to the pragma-dialectical ideal of reasonableness, in case of a difference of opinion the protagonist and the antagonist of a standpoint should attempt to find out by means of a critical discussion whether the protagonist's standpoint is capable of withstanding the antagonist's criticism. In this paper, the authors formulate the latest version of their basic rules for the performance of speech acts in the various stages that can beanalytically distinguished in a critical discussion that can lead to the resolution (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000