18 found
Order:
  1.  57
    Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman & Jurgen Habermas - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (6):307.
  2.  12
    A Constitutional Horizon?Frank I. Michelman - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (7):640-648.
    In The Democratic Horizon: Hyperpluralism and the Renewal of Political Liberalism, Alessandro Ferrara seeks a philosophical breakthrough from what looks like it could be a pending dead-end for democracy. The best hope, Ferrara superbly maintains, lies through an extension or updating – a “renewal,” as he calls it – of lines of thought bequeathed to us, by John Rawls and others, under the name of political liberalism. Somewhere near the crux of Ferrara’s reflection stands a class of institutional fixtures whose (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  3. Brennan and Democracy.Frank I. Michelman - 2005 - Princeton University Press.
    In Brennan and Democracy, a leading thinker in U.S. constitutional law offers some powerful reflections on the idea of "constitutional democracy," a concept in which many have seen the makings of paradox. Here Frank Michelman explores the apparently conflicting commitments of a democratic governmental system where key aspects of such important social issues as affirmative action, campaign finance reform, and abortion rights are settled not by a legislative vote but by the decisions of unelected judges. Can we--or should we--embrace the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  4.  5
    “Constitution ”: Legitimacy and Legality in the Thought of John Rawls.Frank I. Michelman - 2018 - Ratio Juris 31 (4):379-395.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  4
    Israel’s “Constitutional Revolution”: A Thought From Political Liberalism.Frank I. Michelman - 2018 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 19 (2):745-765.
    In his book The Purse and the Sword: The Trials of Israel’s Legal Revolution, Daniel Friedmann brings under critical inspection what he names as a legal revolution in Israel. Friedmann gives us, under that name, an account of a shift of certain major and sensitive state powers from elected leaders and legislators to politically insulated officials and judges. The Supreme Court’s construction of two Basic Law enactments of the twelfth Knesset into a justiciable, substantive “formal constitution” for Israel figures in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  41
    Morality, Identity and “Constitutional Patriotism”.Frank I. Michelman - 2001 - Ratio Juris 14 (3):253-271.
    In a modern, plural society, there can be no settled agreement on the concrete legal content of a country's constitution. The idea of the constitution is nonetheless pivotal in contemporary, liberal‐minded theories of political justification, such as the ones advanced by Jürgen Habermas and John Rawls. Justification in these theories depends finally on “constitutional patriotism,” a consciously shared sentiment arising from an ethical assessment of their country by the country's people, according to which the country credibly pursues a certain regulative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  7.  67
    Parsing “a Right to Have Rights”.Frank I. Michelman - 1996 - Constellations 3 (2):200-208.
  8.  39
    How Can the Poeple Ever Make the Law?Frank I. Michelman - 1997 - Modern Schoolman 74 (4):311-330.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  9.  24
    Human Rights and the Limits of Constitutional Theory.Frank I. Michelman - 2000 - Ratio Juris 13 (1):63-76.
    The question of what is truly just in the matter of a country's currently established human-rights interpretations appears not to be the same as the question of what it is morally right to do by way of coercively effectuating a given set of such interpretations. There are grounds for contending that acts of support for a coercive political regime can be justified morally on the condition that the regime's prevailing human-rights interpretations are made continuously available to effective, democratic critical re-examination. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  29
    Must Constitutional Democracy Be "Responsive"?:Constitutional Domains: Democracy, Community, Management. Robert C. Post.Frank I. Michelman - 1997 - Ethics 107 (4):706-.
  11.  46
    Legalism and Humankind*: FRANK I. MICHELMAN.Frank I. Michelman - 1992 - Social Philosophy and Policy 9 (2):190-208.
    Prescriptive political and moral theories contain ideas about what human beings are like and about what, correspondingly, is good for them. Conceptions of human “nature” and corresponding human good enter into normative argument by way of support and justification. Of course, it is logically open for the ratiocinative traffic to run the other way. Strongly held convictions about the rightness or wrongness, goodness or badness, of certain social institutions or practices may help condition and shape one's responses to one or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  20
    Can Constitutional Democrats Be Legal Positivists? Or Why Constitutionalism?Frank I. Michelman - 1996 - Constellations 2 (3):293-308.
  13.  4
    Political-Liberal Legitimacy and the Question of Judicial Restraint.Frank I. Michelman - 2019 - Jus Cogens 1 (1):59-75.
    The term “judicial restraint,” applied to courts engaged in judicial constitutional review, may refer to any one or more of three possible postures of such courts, which we here will distinguish as “quiescent,” “tolerant,” and “weak-form.” A quiescent court deploys its powers sparingly, strictly limiting the agenda of social disputes on which it will pronounce in the constitution’s name. A tolerant court confirms as valid laws whose constitutional compatibility it finds to be reasonable sustainable, even though it independently would conclude (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  43
    The Property Clause Question.Frank I. Michelman - 2012 - Constellations 19 (2):152-163.
  15.  15
    Postmodernism, Proceduralism, and Constitutional Justice: A Comment on van der Walt and Botha.Frank I. Michelman - 2002 - Constellations 9 (2):246-262.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  11
    Review: Must Constitutional Democracy Be "Responsive"? [REVIEW]Frank I. Michelman - 1997 - Ethics 107 (4):706 - 723.
  17.  3
    At the Liberal Edge in Prague.Frank I. Michelman - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (3):254-255.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  3
    18 Law as Premise.Frank I. Michelman - 2009 - In Francis J. Mootz (ed.), On Philosophy in American Law. Cambridge University Press. pp. 151.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark