90 found
Order:
  1.  10
    Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In R. Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 283-301.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  2.  20
    Identifying Argumentative Patterns: A Vital Step in the Development of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2016 - Argumentation 30 (1):1-23.
    This paper serves as an introduction to the special issue on argumentative patterns in discourse, more in particular on argumentative patterns with pragmatic argumentation as a main argument that are prototypical of argumentative discourse in certain communicative activity types in the political, the legal, the medical, and the academic domain. It situates the studies of argumentative patterns reported in these papers in the pragma-dialectical research program. In order to be able to do so, it is first explained in which consecutive (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  3.  2
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 271-291.
  4.  3
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5.  2
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    Some conspicuous characteristics of argumentation as we all know this phenomenon from our shared everyday experiences are in my view vital to its theoretical treatment because they should have methodological consequences for the way in which argumentation research is conducted. To start with, argumentation is in the first place a communicative act complex, which is realized by making functional verbal communicative moves.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6.  1
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    The study of argumentation is prospering. After its brilliant start in Antiquity, highlighted in the classical works of Aristotle, after an alternation of ups and downs during the following millennia, in the post-Renaissance period its gradual decline set in. Revitalization took place only after Toulmin and Perelman published in the same year their landmark works The Uses of Argument and La nouvelle rhétorique. The model of argumentation presented by Toulmin and Perelman’s inventory of argumentation techniques inspired a great many scholars (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  4
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  2
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Tjark Kruiger, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9.  3
    Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse.Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans van Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.) - 1st ed. 2015 - Springer Verlag.
    How do Dutch people let each other know that they disagree? What do they say when they want to resolve their difference of opinion by way of an argumentative discussion? In what way do they convey that they are convinced by each other’s argumentation? How do they criticize each other’s argumentative moves? Which words and expressions do they use in these endeavors? By answering these questions this short essay provides a brief inventory of the language of argumentation in Dutch.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  38
    The Disguised Abusive Ad Hominem Empirically Investigated: Strategic Manoeuvring with Direct Personal Attacks.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen & Bert Meuffels - 2012 - Thinking and Reasoning 18 (3):344 - 364.
    The main finding of a comprehensive empirical research project on the intersubjective acceptability of the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Van Eemeren, Garssen & Meuffels, 2009) is that ordinary language users judge discussion moves that are considered fallacious from an argumentation-theoretical perspective as unreasonable. In light of this finding it is remarkable that in everyday argumentative discourse fallacies occur regularly and seem many times not to be noticed by the participants in the discourse. This also goes for the abusive argumentum ad hominem. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  11.  33
    Strategic Maneuvering: A Synthetic Recapitulation. [REVIEW]Frans H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):381-392.
    As an introduction to the special issue on Perspectives on Strategic Maneuvering, this article provides a synthetic recapitulation of the various steps that were taken in developing the pragma-dialectical theory of strategic maneuvering. First, the concept of strategic maneuvering is described as a means to reconcile the simultaneous pursuit of dialectical and rhetorical aims. Second, strategic maneuvering is related to the various kinds of argumentative activity types in which it takes place. Third, the concept of dialectical profiles is discussed and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  12.  2
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 49-70.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  1
    The Study of Argumentation as Normative Pragmatics.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 161-177.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14. Democracy and Argumentation.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15. Strategic Maneuvering: Maintaining a Delicate Balance.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. William the Silent’s Argumentative Discourse.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17. Argumentation.Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Scott Jacobs, Sally Jackson, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18. The Skill of Identifying Argumentation.Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Bert Meuffels, Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  19.  42
    Rhetorical Analysis Within a Pragma-Dialectical Framework.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):293-305.
    The paper reacts against the strict separation between dialectical and rhetorical approaches to argumentation and argues that argumentative discourse can be analyzed and evaluated more adequately if the two are systematically combined. Such an integrated approach makes it possible to show how the opportunities available in each of the dialectical stages of a critical discussion have been used strategically to further the rhetorical aims of the speaker or writer. The approach is illustrated with the help of an analysis of an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  20.  27
    The Pragma-Dialectical Theory Under Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (4):439-457.
    During the past thirty years the pragma-dialectical theorizing has developed in various steps from designing an abstract ideal model for critical discussion to examining strategic manoeuvring in the various argumentative activity types in which argumentative discourse manifests itself in argumentative reality. The response to the theoretical proposals that have been made includes, next to approval, also various kinds of criticisms. This paper explores the nature and thrust of these criticisms. In doing so, a distinction is made between criticisms concerning the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21. The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22.  18
    In What Sense Do Modern Argumentation Theories Relate to Aristotle? The Case of Pragma-Dialectics.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (1):49-70.
    According to van Eemeren, argumentation theory is a hybrid discipline, because it requires a multidisciplinary, if not interdisciplinary approach, combining descriptive and normative insights. He points out that modern argumentation theorists give substance to the discipline by relying either on a dialectical perspective, concentrating on the reasonableness of argumentation, or on a rhetorical perspective, concentrating on its effectiveness. Both the dialectical and the rhetorical perspective are interpreted in ways related to how they were viewed by Aristotle, but in modern argumentation (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23. Analyzing Argumentative Discourse.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. A Pragmatic View of the Burden of Proof.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25. The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Interpreted.Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Bert Meuffels, Bart Garssen, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26. Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst & A. Francisca Sn Henkemans - 2015 - Routledge.
    This book concentrates on argumentation as it emerges in ordinary discourse, whether the discourse is institutionalized or strictly informal. Crucial concepts from the theory of argumentation are systematically discussed and explained with the help of examples from real-life discourse and texts. The basic principles are explained that are instrumental in the analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. Methodical instruments are offered for identifying differences of opinion, analyzing and evaluating argumentation and presenting arguments in oral and written discourse. In addition, the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  41
    The Development of the Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):387-403.
    This paper describes the development of pragma-dialectics as a theory of argumentative discourse. First the development of the pragma-dialectical model of a critical discussion is explained, with the rules that are to be complied with in order to avoid fallacies from occurring. Then the integration is discussed of rhetorical insight in the dialectical framework. In this endeavour, the concept of strategic manoeuvring is explained that allows for a more refined and more profoundly justified analysis of argumentative discourse and a better (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  28.  23
    Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
    This article aims tt providing some conceptual tools for dealing adequately with relevance in argumentative discourse. For this purpose, argumentative relevance is defined as a functional interactional relation between certain elements in the discourse. In addition to the distinction between interpretive and evaluative relevance that can be traced in the literature, analytic relevance is introduced as an intermediary concept. In order to classify the various problems of relevance arising in interpreting, analyzing and evaluating argumentative discourse, a taxonomy is proposed in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  29.  3
    Rules for Argumentation in Dialogues.Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Rob Grootendorst, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag. pp. 499-510.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  9
    Rationale for a Pragma-Dialectic Perspective.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 2 (2):271-92.
    Starting from a concept of reasonableness as well-consideredness, it is discussed in what way science could serve as a model for reasonable argumentation. It turns out that in order to be reasonable two requirements have to be fulfilled. The argumentation should comply with rules which are both problem-valid and intersubjectively valid. Geometrical and anthropological perspectives don't meet these criteria, but a critical perspective does. It is explained that a pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation which agrees with this critical perspective is indeed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  31. Argumentation Studies’ Five Estates.Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Dialectical Profiles and Indicators of Argumentative Moves.A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Seizing the Occasion: Parameters for Analysing Ways of Strategic Manoeuvring.Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Peter Houtlosser, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Student Performance in Identifying Unexpressed Premisses and Argumentation Schemes.Ron Oostdam, Rob Grootendorst, Kees Glopper, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren - 1st ed. 2015 - In Ron Oostdam, Rob Grootendorst, Kees Glopper, Frans Eemeren & Frans H. van Eemeren (eds.), Reasonableness and Effectiveness in Argumentative Discourse. Springer Verlag.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  35
    A Pragma-Dialectical Procedure for a Critical Discussion.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 2003 - Argumentation 17 (4):365-386.
    According to the pragma-dialectical ideal of reasonableness, in case of a difference of opinion the protagonist and the antagonist of a standpoint should attempt to find out by means of a critical discussion whether the protagonist's standpoint is capable of withstanding the antagonist's criticism. In this paper, the authors formulate the latest version of their basic rules for the performance of speech acts in the various stages that can beanalytically distinguished in a critical discussion that can lead to the resolution (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36.  12
    The Contextuality of Fallacies.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):59-68.
    Van Eemeren and Houtlosser observe that Walton’s (and Walton and Krabbe’s) notion of ‘dialogue type’ involves a mixture of an empirical notion on a par with a speech event or activity type and a normative notion such as the model of a critical discussion. Then they discuss Walton’s contextual analysis of fallacies as illegitimate dialectical shifts of dialogue types and offer an alternative in which both the empirical and the normative dimension are given their due.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  12
    Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2018 - Informal Logic 38 (1):322-350.
    To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-dialectical theory as it widened its scope, step by step, from an abstract model of critical discussion to the complexities of actual argumentative discourse. It describes how, having contextualized, empiricalized and formalized their approach, pragma-dialecticians are now putting the theory’s analytical instruments to good use in identifying prototypical argumentative patterns in specific communicative activity types in the various communicative domains. This means that they can now start (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation.Frans H. van Eemeren, Bart Garssen, David Godden & Gordon Mitchell (eds.) - 2011 - Rozenberg / Sic Sat.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  9
    Perelman and the Fallacies.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1995 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 28 (2):122-133.
  40. Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments.Frans H. van Eemeren, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson & Erik C. W. Krabbe - 1998 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 31 (1):71-74.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  2
    Argumentation Theory and Argumentative Practices: A Vital but Complex Relationship.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2017 - Informal Logic 37 (4):322-350.
    To illustrate the development of argumentation theory, the paper traces the journey of the pragma-dialectical theory as it widened its scope, step by step, from an abstract model of critical discussion to the complexities of actual argumentative discourse. It describes how, having contextualized, empiricalized and formalized their approach, pragma-dialecticians are now putting the theory’s analytical instruments to good use in identifying prototypical argumentative patterns in specific communicative activity types in the various communicative domains. This means that they can now start (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Preface.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):377-380.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  12
    A World of Difference: The Rich State of Argumentation Theory.Frans H. Van Eemeren - 1995 - Informal Logic 17 (2).
    This paper surveys the contributions to the study of argumentation in the two decades since the work of Toulmin and Perelman. Developments include Radical Argumentativism (Anscombre and Ducot), Communication and Rhetoric (American Speech Communication Theory), Informal Logic (Johnson and Blair), Formal Analyses of Fallacies (Woods and Walton), Formal Dialectics (Barth and Krabbe), and Pragma-Dialectics (van Eemeren and Grootendorst). From the survey it is concluded that argumentation theory has been considerably enriched. If the contributions can be made to converge, a sound (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  7
    Introduction.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):201-203.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  22
    In Memoriam Rob Grootendorst (1944–2000).Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2000 - Argumentation 14 (3):3-6.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  9
    Speech Act Conditions as Tools for Reconstructing Argumentative Discourse.Frans H. van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1989 - Argumentation 3 (4):367-383.
    According to the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation, for analysing argumentative discourse, a normative reconstruction is required which encompasses four kinds of transformations. It is explained in this paper how speech act conditions can play a part in carrying out such a reconstruction. It is argued that integrating Searlean insights concerning speech acts with Gricean insights concerning conversational maxims can provide us with the necessary tools. For this, the standard theory of speech acts has to be amended in several respects and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  18
    Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse in Political Deliberation.Frans H. van Eemeren - 2013 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (1):10-31.
  48.  7
    The Speech Acts of Arguing and Convincing in Externalized Discussions.Frans H. Van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst - 1983 - Informal Logic 5 (2).
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  10
    Kinship: The Relationship Between Johnstone's Ideas About Philosophical Argument and the Pragma-Dialectical Theory of Argumentation.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Peter Houtlosser - 2007 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 40 (1):51-70.
  50.  9
    Special Issue on Strategic Maneuvering in Institutional Contexts Dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956–2008).Frans H. Van Eemeren - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (3):305-315.
1 — 50 / 90