4 found
Friedrich Christoph Doerge [3]Friedrich Doerge [1]
  1.  28
    Re-Definition and Alston's 'Illocutionary Acts'.Friedrich Christoph Doerge - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):97-111.
    The original definition of a technical term, the paper argues, should not be altered without a good reason. This notion is applied to the conception of illocutionary acts suggested by Alston, which markedly differs from the conception originally introduced by John L. Austin. Alston appears to agree with the argument; at least, he does attempt to justify his re-definition. The paper argues, however, that the reasons he gives fail.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  2.  68
    Gricean Communication and Transmission of Thoughts.Friedrich Christoph Doerge & Mark Siebel - 2008 - Erkenntnis 69 (1):55-67.
    Gricean communication is communication between utterers and their audiences, where the utterer means something and the audience understands what is meant. The weak transmission idea is that, whenever such communication takes place, there is something which is transmitted from utterer to audience; the strong transmission idea adds that what is transmitted is nothing else than what is communicated. We try to salvage these ideas from a seemingly forceful attack by Wayne Davis. Davis attaches too much significance to the surface structure (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  85
    The Collapse of Insensitive Semantics.Friedrich Christoph Doerge - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (2):117-140.
    The idea motivating their account, Cappelen and Lepore (C&L) say in Insensitive Semantics (2005), is that semantic content is context invariant, and that all colleagues who take, or even consider, different accounts are just on the wrong track. It is the purpose of their book to disprove all alternative accounts by way of an argument ‘by elimination’. The conclusion they arrive at is that their own account must be accepted by everyone as the only game in town at the end (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  8
    A Scholarly Confusion of Tongues, or, is Promising an Illocutionary Act?Friedrich Doerge - 2009 - Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 5 (1):53-68.
    A scholarly confusion of tongues, or, is promising an illocutionary act? Technical terms, I argued elsewhere, should not be re-defined without a profound reason; for such a re-definition furthers misunderstanding and is therefore undesirable. If my argument is on the right track, then we have reason to acknowledge the original definition of ‘illocutionary acts’ established by John L. Austin; any subsequent re-definition, unless it is specially justified somehow, must count as a terminological mistake. I use this argument, in order to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation