Order:
Disambiguations
Gary Allen [3]Gary L. Allen [1]
  1.  16
    Is Mandatory Research Ethics Reviewing Ethical?Murray Dyck & Gary Allen - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):517-520.
    Review boards responsible for vetting the ethical conduct of research have been criticised for their costliness, unreliability and inappropriate standards when evaluating some non-medical research, but the basic value of mandatory ethical review has not been questioned. When the standards that review boards use to evaluate research proposals are applied to review board practices, it is clear that review boards do not respect researchers or each other, lack merit and integrity, are not just and are not beneficent. The few benefits (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  2.  66
    Getting Beyond Form Filling: The Role of Institutional Governance in Human Research Ethics. [REVIEW]Gary Allen - 2008 - Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (2):105-116.
    It has become almost a truism to describe the interaction between research ethics committees and researchers as being marred by distrust and conflict. The ethical conduct of researchers is increasingly a matter of institutional concern because of the degree to which non-compliance with national standards can expose the entire institution to risk. This has transformed research ethics into what some have described as a research ethics industry. In an operational sense, there is considerable focus on modifying research behaviour through a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  3.  15
    Cue Effects on Memory for Location When Navigating Spatial Displays.Sylvia Fitting, Douglas H. Wedell & Gary L. Allen - 2009 - Cognitive Science 33 (7):1267-1300.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  4
    Mind the Gap: Griffith University’s Approach to the Governance of Ethical Conduct in Human Research.Gary Allen - 2007 - Monash Bioethics Review 26 (1-2):57.
    It is perhaps not coincidental that, at the same time the apparent institutional risks associated with the conduct of human research are increasing, so are the complaints from researchers about research ethics committees. Rather than seeking to implement systems that more efficiently catch wrong-doing, in 2003 Griffith University began implementing an alternative approach. This new approach focused on resourcing the reflective practice of researchers through every stage of their work — well before, and long after, they seek ethical clearance for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation