19 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Nicholas Georgalis [14]N. Georgalis [6]Nick Georgalis [1]
  1.  17
    The Primacy of the Subjective: Foundations for a Unified Theory of Mind and Language.Nicholas Georgalis - 2006 - Cambridge MA: Bradford Book/MIT Press.
    In this highly original monograph, Nicholas Georgalis proposes that the concept of minimal content is fundamental both to the philosophy of mind and to the philosophy of language. He argues that to understand mind and language requires minimal content -- a narrow, first-person, non-phenomenal concept that represents the subject of an agent's intentional state as the agent conceives it. Orthodox third-person objective methodology must be supplemented with first-person subjective methodology. Georgalis demonstrates limitations of a strictly third-person methodology in the study (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  2. The Fiction of Phenomenal Intentionality.Nicholas Georgalis - 2003 - Consciousness and Emotion 4 (2):243-256.
    This paper argues that there is no such thing as ?phenomenal intentionality?. The arguments used by its advocates rely upon an appeal to ?what it is like? (WIL) to attend on some occasion to one?s intentional state. I argue that there is an important asymmetry in the application of the WIL phenomenon to sensory and intentional states. Advocates of ?phenomenal intentionality? fail to recognize this, but this asymmetry undermines their arguments for phenomenal intentionality. The broader issue driving the advocacy of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    Kastner, RE.L. Bovens, T. Brauner, B. J. Copeland, C. S. Delancey, J. Dubucs, K. Fine, A. Galton, N. Georgalis, J. Gert & K. Green - 2006 - Synthese 150:511.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. Representation and the First-Person Perspective.N. Georgalis - 2006 - Synthese 150 (2):281-325.
    The orthodox view in the study of representation is that a strictly third-person objective methodology must be employed. The acceptance of this methodology is shown to be a fundamental and debilitating error. Toward this end I defend what I call.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  81
    No Access for the Externalist: Discussion of Heil's 'Privileged Access'.N. Georgalis - 1990 - Mind 100 (393):101-8.
  6.  45
    First-Person Methodologies: A View From Outside the Phenomenological Tradition.Nicholas Georgalis - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):93-112.
    It is argued that results from first-person methodologies are unacceptable for incorporation into a fundamental philosophical theory of the mind unless they satisfy a necessary condition, which I introduce and defend. I also describe a narrow, nonphenomenal, first-person concept that I call minimal content that satisfies this condition. Minimal content is irreducible to third-person concepts, but it is required for an adequate account of intentionality, representation, and language. Consequently, consciousness is implicated in these as strongly—but differently—than it is in our (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  74
    Rethinking Burge's Thought Experiment.N. Georgalis - 1999 - Synthese 118 (2):145-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  38
    Asymmetry of Access to Intentional States.N. Georgalis - 1994 - Erkenntnis 40 (2):185-211.
  9.  58
    Awareness, Understanding, and Functionalism.N. Georgalis - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (2):225-56.
  10.  89
    Burge's Thought Experiment: Still in Need of Defense. [REVIEW]Nicholas Georgalis - 2003 - Erkenntnis 58 (2):267-273.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  15
    Intentionality and Representation.Nicholas Georgalis - 1986 - International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):45-58.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  1
    Intentionality and Representation.Nicholas Georgalis - 1986 - International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):45-58.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  23
    PostScript.Nicholas Georgalis - 2007 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 45 (S1):121-126.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  23
    Ontology Downgraded All the Way.Nicholas Georgalis - 1999 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):238–256.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  19
    Reference Remains Inscrutable.Nicholas Georgalis - 2000 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 81 (2):123–129.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  18
    Review. [REVIEW]Nicholas Georgalis - 1989 - Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (6):745-748.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  8
    Review: A Realist's Teleological View of Belief. [REVIEW]Nicholas Georgalis - 1990 - Behavior and Philosophy 18 (2):85 - 88.
  18. First-Person Intentionality.Nick Georgalis - 2006 - In The Primacy of the Subjective. MIT Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Mind, Language and Subjectivity: Minimal Content and the Theory of Thought.Nicholas Georgalis - 2014 - Routledge.
    In this monograph Nicholas Georgalis further develops his important work on minimal content, recasting and providing novel solutions to several of the fundamental problems faced by philosophers of language. His theory defends and explicates the importance of ‘thought-tokens’ and minimal content and their many-to-one relation to linguistic meaning, challenging both ‘externalist’ accounts of thought and the solutions to philosophical problems of language they inspire. The concepts of idiolect, use, and statement made are critically discussed, and a classification of kinds of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography