29 found
Order:
Disambiguations
George Pavlakos [26]George I. Pavlakos [4]
See also
George Pavlakos
University of Glasgow
George Pavlakos
Glasgow University
  1. Law-Determination as Grounding: A Common Grounding Framework for Jurisprudence.Samuele Chilovi & George Pavlakos - 2019 - Legal Theory 25 (1):53-76.
    Law being a derivative feature of reality, it exists in virtue of more fundamental things, upon which it depends. This raises the question of what is the relation of dependence that holds between law and its more basic determinants. The primary aim of this paper is to argue that grounding is that relation. We first make a positive case for this claim, and then we defend it from the potential objection that the relevant relation is rather rational determination (Greenberg 2004, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  2.  8
    Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy.George Pavlakos & Robert Alexy (eds.) - 2007 - Hart.
    This volume reflects the breadth of Alexy's philosophy, identifies new areas of inquiry and offers a new impetus to the discourse theory of law.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3. Three Comments on Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity.George Pavlakos, Niko Kolodny, Ulrike Heuer & Douglas Lavin - 2011 - Jurisprudence 2 (2):329-378.
    This section is a discussion of Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity introduced by Georgios Pavlakos.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  4.  7
    Introduction.George Pavlakos - 2016 - Jurisprudence 7 (2):297-298.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  1
    New Essays on the Normativity of Law.Stefano Bertea & George Pavlakos (eds.) - 2011 - Hart.
    An important part of the legal domain has to do with rule-governed conduct, and is expressed by the use of notions such as norm, obligation, duty and right. These require us to acknowledge the normative dimension of law. Normativity is, accordingly, to be regarded as a central feature of law lying at the heart of any comprehensive legal-theoretical project. The essays collected in this book are meant to further our understanding of the normativity of law. More specifically, the book stages (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  18
    Constitutional Rights, Balancing and the Structure of Autonomy.George Pavlakos - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (1):129-153.
    The question of the character of constitutional rights norms is complex and admits of no easy answer. Without reducing the complexity of the issue, I attempt in this paper to formulate some clear views on the matter. I shall argue that constitutional rights reasoning is a species of rational practical reasoning that combines both balancing and the grounds as to why balancing is appropriate . Absent the latter type of reason, the application of constitutional principles remains a pure instance of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  77
    Practice, Reasons, and the Agent's Point of View.George Pavlakos - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (1):74-94.
    Positivism, in its standard outlook, is normative contextualism: If legal reasons are content-independent, then their content may vary with the context or point of view. Despite several advantages vis-à-vis strong metaphysical conceptions of reasons, contextualism implies relativism, which may lead further to the fragmentation of the point of view of agency. In his Oxford Hart Lecture, Coleman put forward a fresh account of the moral semantics of legal content, one that lays claim to preserving the unity of agency while retaining (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  11
    Normativity versus Ontologiy: Law, Facts and Practical Reason.George Pavlakos - 2003 - Rechtstheorie 34 (4):393-419.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. The Explanatory Demands of Grounding in Law.Samuele Chilovi & George Pavlakos - forthcoming - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
    A new strategy in philosophy of law appeals to explanatory gap arguments to attack legal positivism. We argue that the strategy faces a dilemma, which derives from there being two available readings of the constraint it places on legal grounding. To this end, we elaborate the most promising ways of spelling out the epistemic constraints governing law-determination, and show that each of the arguments based on them has problems. Throughout the paper, we evaluate a number of explanatory requirements, ultimately with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. The Explanatory Demands of Grounding in Law.Samuele Chilovi & George Pavlakos - forthcoming - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
    A new strategy in philosophy of law appeals to explanatory gap arguments to attack legal positivism. We argue that the strategy faces a dilemma, which derives from there being two available readings of the constraint it places on legal grounding. To this end, we elaborate the most promising ways of spelling out the epistemic constraints governing law-determination, and show that each of the arguments based on them has problems. Throughout the paper, we evaluate a number of explanatory requirements, ultimately with (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  25
    Jurisprudence or Legal Science?: A Debate About the Nature of Legal Theory.Sean Coyle & George Pavlakos (eds.) - 2005 - Hart Publishing.
    Are the scientific and juristic approaches in the end as rigidly distinct from one another as some have claimed?In a series of important new essays the authors ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Preliminary Remarks on a Theory of Legal Normativity.Triantafyllos Gkouvas & George Pavlakos - 2011 - In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press.
  13.  26
    Autonomy and Normativity: Investigations of Truth, Right and Beauty.George I. Pavlakos - 2003 - Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):908-910.
    Truth, right, and beauty are normative. In other words, our theoretical, practical, and aesthetic judgements are founded only if they correspond to standards for truth, rightness, or beauty respectively. The book at hand is not primarily interested in the differences between kinds of normativity—in fact, it treats normativity in a more or less unified way—nor does it spend much time on listing criteria for truth, right, or beauty. Rather, its primary aim is to discover what metaphysical status any normative foundation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  2
    Agency, Negligence and Responsibility.George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.) - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays represents a ground-breaking collaboration between moral philosophers, action theorists, lawyers and legal theorists to set a fresh research agenda on agency and responsibility in negligence. The complex phenomenon of responsibility in negligence is analysed from multi- and interdisciplinary perspectives, shedding light on key ethical and legal issues related to agency and negligence to impact substantive law and policy-making in different jurisdictions. The volume introduces new debates and questions old assumptions, inviting the reader to rethink substantive law (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Agency, Negligence and Responsibility.George I. Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.) - 2021 - Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of essays represents a ground-breaking collaboration between moral philosophers, action theorists, lawyers and legal theorists to set a fresh research agenda on agency and responsibility in negligence. The complex phenomenon of responsibility in negligence is analysed from multi- and interdisciplinary perspectives, shedding light on key ethical and legal issues related to agency and negligence to impact substantive law and policy-making in different jurisdictions. The volume introduces new debates and questions old assumptions, inviting the reader to rethink substantive law (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  32
    Correctness and Cognitivism. Remarks on Robert Alexy's Argument From the Claim to Correctness.George Pavlakos - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (1):15-30.
    The argument from the claim to correctness has been put forward by Robert Alexy to defend the view that normative utterances admit of objective answers. My purpose in this paper is to preserve this initial aspiration even at the cost of diverting from some of the original ideas in support of the argument. I begin by spelling out a full-blooded version of normative cognitivism, against which I propose to reconstruct the argument from the claim to correctness. I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  56
    Coercion and the Grounds of Legal Obligation: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom.George Pavlakos - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (2):305-316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. David Daiches Raphael, Concepts of Justice Reviewed By.George I. Pavlakos - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22 (4):301-303.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. David Daiches Raphael, Concepts of Justice. [REVIEW]George Pavlakos - 2002 - Philosophy in Review 22:301-303.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  9
    From a Pluralism of Grounds to Proto‐Legal Relations: Accounting for the Grounds of Obligations of Justice.George Pavlakos - 2017 - Ratio Juris 30 (1):59-74.
    In this paper I discuss critically Mathias Risse's paper “Responsibility and Global Justice.” First, I argue that for Risse's pluralist account of the grounds of justice to hold together, there is need to presuppose a monist standpoint which ultimately contributes to grounding principles of justice. Second, I point out that Risse's understanding of obligations of accountability and justification is rather narrow in that it functions as an addendum to obligations of justice. Conversely, I will suggest that the obligation of accountability (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. Jürgen Habermas, The Liberating Power of Symbols Reviewed By.George I. Pavlakos - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (5):334-336.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Jürgen Habermas, The Liberating Power of Symbols. [REVIEW]George Pavlakos - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21:334-336.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  18
    Non-Individualism, Rights, and Practical Reason.George Pavlakos - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (1):66-93.
  24. Our Knowledge of the Law: Objectivity and Practice in Legal Theory.George Pavlakos - 2007 - Hart.
    In this book the author argues that knowledge is the outcome of an activity of judging, which is constrained by reasons (reflexive).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  25.  5
    On Second-Order Morality.George Pavlakos - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (2):276-297.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26.  19
    On the Necessity of the Interconnection Between Law and Morality.George Pavlakos - 2005 - Ratio Juris 18 (1):64-83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. Practical Normativity. Essays on Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Reason.George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez Blanco (eds.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency.George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.) - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of new essays explores in depth how and why we act when we follow practical standards, particularly in connection with the authority of legal texts and lawmakers. The essays focus on the interplay of intentions and practical reasons, engaging incisive arguments to demonstrate both the close connection between them, and the inadequacy of accounts that downplay this important link. Their wide-ranging discussion includes topics such as legal interpretation, the paradox of intention, the relation between moral and legal obligation, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. The Metaphysics of Law: From Supervenience to Rational Justification.George Pavlakos - 2017 - In B. Brozek, Antonino Rotolo & J. Stelmach (eds.), Supervenience and Normativity. Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark