Results for 'Giuseppina D'

986 found
Order:
  1.  61
    Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Non-causalism in the Philosophy of Action.Giuseppina D'Oro & Constantine Sandis (eds.) - 2013 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
  2. From Anticausalism to Causalism and Back.Giuseppina D'Oro & Constantine Sandis - 2013 - In Giuseppina D'Oro & Constantine Sandis (eds.), Reasons and Causes: Causalism and Non-causalism in the Philosophy of Action. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 7-48.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3. Imagination and Revision.Giuseppina D'Oro & Jonas Ahlskog - 2021 - In C. M. van den Akker (ed.), The Routledge Companion to History and Theory. Routledge. pp. 215-232.
    In this contribution we explore revisionists and anti-revisionists conceptions of the historical imagination. The focus will be on how these conceptions of the historical imagination determine how one ought to answer the question of whether or not it is in principle possible to know the past in its own terms rather than from the perspective of the present. The contrast that we are seeking to draw is that between a conception of the historical imagination which is revisionist in the sense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4. On an imaginary dialogue between a causalist and an anti-causalist.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2019 - In Severin Schroeder (ed.), Explanation in Action Theory and Historiography: Causal and Teleological Approaches. Routledge. pp. 97-111.
  5. Why Collingwood Matters: A Defence of Humanistic Understanding.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2023 - Bloomsbury.
    R.G. Collingwood (1889-1943) was an English philosopher, historian and practicing archaeologist. His work, particularly in the philosophy of action and history, has been profoundly influential in the 20th and 21st century. Although the importance of his work is indisputable, this is the first book to consider how and why it actually matters. Giussepina D'oro considers the importance of Collingwood as a thinker who thinks kaleidoscopically and, unlike lots of contemporary philosophers, refuses to focus on narrow, technical interests but instead, observes (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  24
    Preliteracy signatures of poor-reading abilities in resting-state EEG.Giuseppina Schiavone, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen, Natasha M. Maurits, Anna Plakas, Ben A. M. Maassen, Huibert D. Mansvelder, Aryan van der Leij & Titia L. van Zuijen - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  7. Aristotele E il paradosso dell'errore volontario.Giuseppina D'Addelfio - 2002 - Giornale di Metafisica 24 (3):411-446.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  32
    The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology.Soren Overgaard & Giuseppina D'Oro (eds.) - 2017 - Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology offers clear and comprehensive coverage of the main methodological debates and approaches within philosophy. The chapters in this volume approach the question of how to do philosophy from a wide range of perspectives, including conceptual analysis, critical theory, deconstruction, experimental philosophy, hermeneutics, Kantianism, methodological naturalism, phenomenology, and pragmatism. They explore general conceptions of philosophy, centred on the question of what the point of philosophising might be; the method of conceptual analysis and its recent naturalistic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  9.  7
    Ragionamento pratico e argomentazione metafisica.Giuseppina D'Addelfio - 2006 - Giornale di Metafisica 28 (2):285-306.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  8
    What is not Teaching? Levinassian Notes on Maieutics and Contemporary Education.Giuseppina D'Addelfio - 2023 - ENCYCLOPAIDEIA 27 (1S):81-88.
    The paper orbits around Lévinas’ idea of teaching as opposite to Socratic maieutic method. According to the phenomenologist, pursuing only the goal of drawing out of the students what is already contained in them relegates teaching to a secondary role and, first and foremost, underlies an anthropology centered on the ego and not on the relationship. The aim of the paper is to show how this anthropology is unable to respond to many “emergencies” of contemporary education.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  14
    A note on the decidability of exponential terms.Paola D'Aquino & Giuseppina Terzo - 2007 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (3):306-310.
    In this paper we prove, modulo Schanuel's Conjecture, that there are algorithms which decide if two exponential polynomials in π are equal in ℝ and if two exponential polynomials in π and i coincide in ℂ.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  54
    In defence of the agent-centred perspective.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (5):652-667.
    : This article explores certain issues that arise at the borderline between conceptual analysis and metaphysics, where answers to questions of a conceptual nature compete with answers to questions of an ontological or metaphysical nature. I focus on the way in which three philosophers, Kant, Collingwood and Davidson, articulate the relationship between the conceptual question "What are actions?" and the metaphysical question "How is agency possible?" I argue that the way in which one handles the relationship between the conceptual and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13. British Idealism.James Connelly & Giuseppina D'Oro - 2019 - In J. A. Shand (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to 19th Century Philosophy. Blackwell. pp. 365-389.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  60
    Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2002 - New York: Routledge.
    Giuseppina D'Oro explores Collingwood's work in epistemology and metaphysics, uncovering his importance beyond his better known work in philosophy of history and aesthetics. This major contribution to our understanding of one of the most important figures in history of philosophy will be essential reading for scholars of Collingwood and all students of metaphysics and the history of philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  15. Robin George Collingwood.Giuseppina D'Oro & James Connelly - 2020 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  16.  36
    Between ontological hubris and epistemic humility: Collingwood, Kant and the role of transcendental arguments.Giuseppina D’Oro - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 27 (2):336-357.
    This paper explores and defends a form of transcendental argument that is neither bold in its attempt to answer the sceptic, as ambitious transcendental strategies, nor epistemically humble, as modest transcendental strategies. While ambitious transcendental strategies seek to meet the sceptical challenge, and modest transcendental strategies accept the validity of the challenge but retreat to a position of epistemic humility, this form of transcendental argument denies the assumption that undergirds the challenge, namely that truth and falsity may be legitimately predicated (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  17. Reasons and Causes: The Philosophical Battle and The Meta-philosophical War.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (2):207 - 221.
    ?Are the reasons for acting also the causes of action?? When this question was asked in the early 1960s it received by and large a negative reply: ?No, reasons are not causes?. Yet, when the same question ?Are the reasons for acting the causes of action?? is posed some twenty years later, the predominant answer is ?Yes, reasons are causes?. How could one and the same question receive such diverging answers in the space of only a couple of decades? This (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  18.  92
    Collingwood on re-enactment and the identity of thought.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):87-101.
    In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:Journal of the History of Philosophy 38.1 (2000) 87-101 [Access article in PDF] Collingwood on Re-Enactment and The Identity of Thought Giuseppina D'oro University of Keele Collingwood's The Idea of History is often discussed in the context of the issue of the reducibility/non-reducibility of explanations in the social sciences to explanations in the natural sciences. In the 1950s and 60s, following the publication of Hempel's influential article, "The (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  19. The leopard does not change its spots: naturalism and the argument against methodological pluralism in the sciences.Jonas Ahlskog & Giuseppina D'Oro - 2022 - In Adam Tuboli & Ákos Sivadó (eds.), The History of Understanding in Analytic Philosophy: Before and After Logical Empiricism. Bloomsbury. pp. 185-208.
    This paper sets out to undermine the view that a commitment to the early modern conception of the mind as immortalized in Ryle’s metaphor of the (Cartesian) ghost in the machine and in Quine’s metaphor of the (Lockean) myth of the museum is required to articulate a defence of the sui generis character of humanistic explanations. These powerful metaphors have not only contributed to undermining the claim for methodological pluralism by caricaturizing the arguments for disunity in the sciences; they have (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. The touch of King Midas: Collingwood on why actions are not events.Giuseppina D’Oro - 2018 - Philosophical Explorations 21 (1):160-169.
    It is the ambition of natural science to provide complete explanations of reality. Collingwood argues that science can only explain events, not actions. The latter is the distinctive subject matter of history and can be described as actions only if they are explained historically. This paper explains Collingwood’s claim that the distinctive subject matter of history is actions and why the attempt to capture this subject matter through the method of science inevitably ends in failure because science explains events, not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21.  50
    Robin George Collingwood.Giuseppina D'Oro & James Connelly - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  22. Metafisica in questione.Rosa Maria Lupo, Giuseppina D'addelfio & Paolo Landi - 2002 - Giornale di Metafisica 24 (3):385-490.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  68
    The Myth of Collingwood's Historicism.Giuseppina D'oro - 2010 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 53 (6):627-641.
    This paper seeks to clarify the precise sense in which Collingwood's “metaphysics without ontology” is a descriptive metaphysics. It locates Collingwood's metaphysics against the background of Strawson's distinction between descriptive and revisionary metaphysics and then defends it against the claim that Collingwood reduced metaphysics to a form of cultural anthropology. Collingwood's metaphysics is descriptive not because it is some sort of historicised psychology that describes temporally parochial and historically shifting assumptions, but because it is a high level form of conceptual (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  24.  57
    To reply or not to reply, that is the question: descriptive metaphysics and the sceptical challenge.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2023 - In Benjamin De Mesel and Sybren Heyndels Audun Bengtson (ed.), P.F. Strawson and His Philosophical Legacy. Oxford University Press. pp. 192-211.
    How should one respond to scepticism? Should one seek to refute it? Or should scepticism be ignored? This paper argues that descriptive metaphysics occupies an intermediate logical space between truth-directed transcendental arguments aimed at refuting the sceptic and the quietist stance of the Humean naturalist who declines to take up the sceptical challenge. Descriptive metaphysics is neither quietist nor confrontational. It seeks to show, rather, that the sceptic is not a genuine partner in conversation.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. History and Idealism: Collingwood and Oakeshott.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2015 - In Malpass Jeff & Malpas Jeff (eds.), The Routledge Companion to hermenutics. Routledge. pp. 191-204.
  26.  51
    Unlikely Bedfellows? Collingwood, Carnap and the Internal/External Distinction.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (4):802-817.
    Idealism is often associated with the kind of metaphysical system building which was successfully disposed of by logical positivism. As Hume's fork was intended to deliver a serious blow to Leibnizian metaphysics so logical positivism invoked the verificationist principle against the reawakening of metaphysics, in the tradition of German and British idealism. In the light of this one might reasonably wonder what Carnap's pragmatism could possibly have in common with Collingwood's idealism. After all, Carnap is often seen as a champion (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27. Collingwood’s Idealist Metaontology: Between Therapy and Armchair Science.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2017 - In Soren Overgaard & Giuseppina D'Oro (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Philosophical Methodology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 211-228.
  28. Collingwood and the Metaphysics of Experience.Giuseppina D'oro - 2004 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 66 (2):365-368.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  29.  74
    Re-enactment and radical interpretation.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2004 - History and Theory 43 (2):198–208.
    This article discusses R. G. Collingwood’s account of re-enactment and Donald Davidson’s account of radical translation. Both Collingwood and Davidson are concerned with the question “how is understanding possible?” and both seek to answer the question transcendentally by asking after the heuristic principles that guide the historian and the radical translator. Further, they both agree that the possibility of understanding rests on the presumption of rationality. But whereas Davidson’s principle of charity entails that truth is a presupposition or heuristic principle (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  30. Two dogmas of contemporary philosophy of action.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 1 (1):10-24.
    Davidson's seminal essay "Actions, Reasons and Causes" brought about a paradigm shift in the theory of action. Before Davidson the consensus was that the fundamental task of a theory of action was to elucidate the concept of action and event explanation. The debate concerning the nature of action explanation thus took place primarily in the philosophy of history and social science and was focussed on purely methodological issues. After Davidson it has been assumed that the fundamental challenge for the theory (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  31.  31
    On Collingwood's Rehabilitation of the Ontological Argument.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2000 - Idealistic Studies 30 (3):173-188.
    The paper is divided in two parts. In the first I consider the nature of Ryle's attack on Collingwood's appropriation of the ontological argument and Collingwood's defence in the unpublished correspondence. In the second, I go beyond the confines of the Ryle-Collingwood exchange in the mid 'thirties to say something much more general about the nature of Collingwood's metaphysics as well as to advance an explanation of the compatibility of Collingwood's combined defence of descriptive metaphysics and the ontological proof.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  32. In defence of a humanistically oriented historiography: the nature/culture distinction at the time of the Anthropocene.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2020 - In Jouni Matt-Kuukkanen (ed.), Philosophy of History: Twenty-First-Century Perspectives. Bloomsbury. Bloomsbury. pp. 216-236.
    “Do Anthropocene narratives confuse an important distinction between the natural and the historical past?” asks Giuseppina D’Oro. D’Oro defends the view that the concept of the historical past is sui generis and distinct from that of the geological past against a new, Anthropocene-inspired challenge to the possibility of a humanistically oriented historiography. She argues that the historical past is not a short segment of geological time, the time of the human species on Earth, but the past investigated from the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  70
    The Ontological Backlash: Why did Mainstream Analytic Philosophy Lose Interest in the Philosophy of History?Giuseppina D’Oro - 2008 - Philosophia 36 (4):403-415.
    This paper seeks to explain why mainstream analytic philosophy lost interest in the philosophy of history. It suggests that the reasons why the philosophy of history no longer commands the attention of mainstream analytical philosophy may be explained by the success of an ontological backlash against the linguistic turn and a view of philosophy as a form of conceptual analysis. In brief I argue that in the 1950s and 1960s the philosophy of history attracted the interest of mainstream analytical philosophers (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  6
    British Idealism.James Connelly & Giuseppina D'Oro - 2019 - In John Shand (ed.), A Companion to Nineteenth‐Century Philosophy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley. pp. 365–388.
    This chapter identifies some themes in British idealism, especially those which resonate in contemporary debates, through an examination of T.H. Green, F.H. Bradley and J.M.E. McTaggart. It focuses primarily on metaphysics and epistemology, supplemented by discussion of the ethics of Green and Bradley. In characterizing British idealism in more detail, it is important to start with T.H. Green, whose importance lay both in his philosophical thought, and also in his active engagement with Oxford local politics, educational standards and school reform, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. Idealism and the philosophy of mind.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2005 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (5):395-412.
    This paper defends an idealist form of non-reductivism in the philosophy of mind. I refer to it as a kind of conceptual dualism without substance dualism. I contrast this idealist alternative with the two most widespread forms of non-reductivism: multiple realisability functionalism and anomalous monism. I argue first, that functionalism fails to challenge seriously the claim for methodological unity since it is quite comfortable with the idea that it is possible to articulate a descriptive theory of the mind. Second, that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36. Human History in the Age of the Anthropocene: A Defence of the Nature/Culture Distinction.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2021 - Iai News.
    A legacy of Enlightenment thought was to see the human as separate from nature. Human history was neatly distinguished from natural history. The age of Anthropocene has now put all that into question. This human exceptionalism is seen by some as responsible for the devastating impact humans have had on the planet. But if we give up on the nature / culture distinction and see human activity as just another type of natural process, we risk losing our ability to attribute (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  26
    Davidson and the Autonomy of the Human Sciences.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2011 - In Dialogues with Davidson: New Perspectives on his Philosophy. MIT Press. pp. 283-296.
    This chapter explores the kind of nonreductivism defended by Davidson and compares it with that which predominated in mid-century. Davidson’s argument for the autonomy of the human sciences is contrasted with the one developed by R. G. Collingwood as presented through the interpretative efforts of W. H. Dray. It is argued here that Davidson’s arguments against the anticausalist consensus that dominated the first half of the twentieth century were not conclusive and that the success of causalism in the latter half (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  38.  78
    Collingwood, psychologism and internalism.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2004 - European Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):163–177.
    The paper defends Collingwood's account of rational explanation against two objections. The first is that he psychologizes the concept of practical reason. The second is that he fails to distinguish mere rationalizations from rationalizations that have causal power. I argue that Collingwood endorses a form of nonpsychologizing internalism which rests on the view that the appropriate explanans for actions are neither empirical facts (as externalists claim), nor psychological facts (as some internalists claim), but propositional facts. I then defend this form (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  39. How to (and not to) Defend the Manifest Image.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2019 - In Paul Giladi (ed.), Responses to Naturalism: From Idealism and Pragmatism. Routledge. pp. 144-164.
    Claims such as ‘there are no tables and chairs’ have become increasingly common in the philosophical context, and eliminativism is now a fairly well-established position in contemporary debates in analytic metaphysics. This outbreak of eliminativism has prompted a number of responses aimed at saving the manifest image of reality. Prominent amongst the attempts to save the manifest image is a view, powerfully articulated by Frank Jackson in From Metaphysics to Ethics , according to which the manifest properties of objects, properties (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  76
    Collingwood and Ryle on the concept of mind.Giuseppina D'oro - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (1):18 – 30.
    This paper argues that Collingwood's philosophy of mind offers an interesting and compelling account of the nature of the mind and of the irreducibility of the mental, an account whose viability and relevance to contemporary debates ought to be given serious consideration. I suggest that the reason why Collingwood's contribution to the philosophy of mind has been neglected is due to the fact that his philosophy of mind is widely, even if mistakenly, regarded as the target of Ryle's attacks on (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41. De la distinction entre action et événement.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2014 - Recherches Sur la Philosophie Et le Langage 30:169-186.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42. The Logocentric Predicament and the Logic of Question and Answer.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2014 - In Other Logics: Historical and Philosophical Alternatives to Formal Logic in the History of Thought and Contemporary Philosophy. Leiden and Boston: Brill. pp. 221-234.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  42
    The Philosopher and the Grapes: On Descriptive Metaphysics and Why It Is Not ‘Sour Metaphysics’.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2013 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (4):586-599.
    There is a widespread view according to which descriptive metaphysics is not ‘real’ metaphysics. This paper argues that first-order philosophical disagreements cannot be settled without re-opening the debate about the nature of philosophical enquiry and that failure to scrutinize and justify one’s own metaphilosophical stance leads to arguments which are circular or question begging.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  43
    Understanding Others: Cultural Anthropology with Collingwood and Quine.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 7 (3):326-345.
  45.  13
    Why Epistemic Pluralism Does not Entail Relativism: Collingwood’s Hinge Epistemology.Giuseppina D’Oro - 2018 - In Karim Dharamsi, Giuseppina D'Oro & Stephen Leach (eds.), Collingwood on Philosophical Methodology. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 151-175.
    D’Oro asks whether Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions leads to the belief-system relativism that is the target of Boghossian’s sustained criticism in his Fear of Knowledge. She argues that Collingwood’s metaphysics of absolute presuppositions aims to defend a form of epistemic pluralism which is not reducible to the kind of epistemic relativism Boghossian critiques. The decoupling of epistemic pluralism from epistemic relativism rests on a reading of absolute presuppositions as epistemic “hinges” which give rise to the characteristic complexes of questions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  6
    An Essay on Philosophical Method.James Connelly & Giuseppina D'Oro (eds.) - 2005 - Clarendon Press.
    James Connelly and Giuseppina D'Oro present a new edition of R. G. Collingwood's classic work of 1933, supplementing the original text with important related writings from Collingwood's manuscripts which appear here for the first time. The editors also contribute a substantial new introduction. The volume will be welcomed by all historians of twentieth-century philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47.  45
    Collingwood, Metaphysics, and Historicism.Giuseppina D'oro - 2002 - Dialogue 41 (1):71.
    RÉSUMÉ: Cet article discute l'idée que la philosophie tardive de Collingwood soit d'orientation historiciste et relativiste. Je soutiens que cette accusation de relativisme historique est basée sur deux erreurs, l'une exégétique et l'autre philosophique. L'erreur exégétique est le résultat de l'hypothèse d'une prétendue «conversion radicale». L'erreur philosophique repose sur la conception selon laquelle il n'y a pas de différences substantielles entre le projet d'une métaphysique descriptive et le projet de la sociologie de la connaissance. L'article essaie de saper à la (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48. The gap is semantic, not epistemological.Giuseppina D'Oro - 2007 - Ratio 20 (2):168-178.
    This paper explores an alternative to the metaphysical challenge to physicalism posed by Jackson and Kripke and to the epistemological one exemplified by the positions of Nagel, Levine and McGinn. On this alternative the mind‐body gap is neither ontological nor epistemological, but semantic. I claim that it is because the gap is semantic that the mind‐body problem is a quintessentially philosophical problem that is not likely to wither away as our natural scientific knowledge advances.1.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  25
    Collingwood, Scientism and Historicism.Giuseppina D’Oro & James Connelly - 2017 - Journal of the Philosophy of History 11 (3):275-288.
  50. Collingwood, Scientism and Historicism.Giuseppina D'Oro & James Connelly - 2017 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 11:275-288.
1 — 50 / 986