8 found
  1.  27
    Self-Organization of Cognitive Performance.Guy C. Van Orden, John G. Holden & Michael T. Turvey - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (3):331.
  2.  23
    Dispersion of Response Times Reveals Cognitive Dynamics.John G. Holden, Guy C. Van Orden & Michael T. Turvey - 2009 - Psychological Review 116 (2):318-342.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  3.  13
    Word Identification in Reading and the Promise of Subsymbolic Psycholinguistics.Guy C. Van Orden, Bruce F. Pennington & Gregory O. Stone - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (4):488-522.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  4.  9
    The Pervasiveness of 1/F Scaling in Speech Reflects the Metastable Basis of Cognition.Christopher T. Kello, Gregory G. Anderson, John G. Holden & Guy C. Van Orden - 2008 - Cognitive Science 32 (7):1217-1231.
  5.  12
    Functional Neuroimages Fail to Discover Pieces of Mind in the Parts of the Brain.Guy C. Van Orden & Kenneth R. Paap - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (Supplement):S85-S94.
    The method of positron emission tomography illustrates the circular logic popular in subtractive neuroimaging and linear reductive cognitive psychology. Both require that strictly feed-forward, modular, cognitive components exist, before the fact, to justify the inference of particular components from images after the fact. Also, both require a "true" componential theory of cognition and laboratory tasks, before the fact, to guarantee reliable choices for subtractive contrasts. None of these possibilities are likely. Consequently, linear reductive analysis has failed to yield general, reliable, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  6.  23
    Schneider's Apraxia and the Strained Relation Between Experience and Description.Guy C. Van Orden & Marian A. Jansen op de Haar - 2000 - Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):247-259.
    Borrett, Kelly and Kwan [ Phenomenology, dynamical neural networks and brain function, Philosophical Psychology, 13, 000-000] claim that unbiased, self-evident, direct description is possible, and may supply the data that brain theories account for. Merleau-Ponty's [ Phenomenology of perception, London: Routledge] description of Schneider's apraxia is offered as a case in point. According to the authors, Schneider's apraxia justifies brain components of predicative and pre-predicative experience. The description derives from a bias, however, that parallels modularity's morphological reduction. The presence of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  7.  18
    Feedback Consistency Effects.Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
    Models are not adequately evaluated simply by whether they capture the data, after the fact. Other criteria are needed. One criterion is parsimony; but utility and generality are at least as important. Even with respect to parsimony, however, the case against feedback is not as straightforward as Norris et al. present it. We use feedback consistency effects to illustrate these points.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
  8.  9
    Specificity in a Global Array is Only One Possibility.Eric L. Amazeen & Guy C. Van Orden - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):887-888.
    The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation