Results for 'Hank Greely'

334 found
Order:
  1.  19
    Should Cerebral Organoids be Used for Research if they Have the Capacity for Consciousness?Henry T. “HankGreely & Karola V. Kreitmair - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):575-584.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2.  75
    Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G. Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim, Bernie Lo, Rebecca Pentz, Laura Rodriguez, Carol Weil, Benjamin S. Wilfond & David Wendler - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):34-42.
    Different types of consent are used to obtain human biospecimens for future research. This variation has resulted in confusion regarding what research is permitted, inadvertent constraints on future research, and research proceeding without consent. The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center's Department of Bioethics held a workshop to consider the ethical acceptability of addressing these concerns by using broad consent for future research on stored biospecimens. Multiple bioethics scholars, who have written on these issues, discussed the reasons for consent, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  3.  3
    Of Nails and Hammers.Henry T. Greely - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 501–520.
    This chapter explores the questions “What policy tools do we have to deal with human biological enhancements?” as well as “What policy tools do we need?.” After discussing the policy tools available in the United States, it examines their adequacy in coping with human biological enhancements in two respects – how easy they would be to adopt and how easy they would be to enforce. In each category, three major issues raised by human biological enhancement are considered: safety, coercion, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  4.  9
    Reality testing and metacognition.Nathaniel Greely - forthcoming - Philosophical Psychology.
    Reality testing is the process by which we distinguish our own perceptual states from imagination or episodic memory. I argue that reality testing is a metacognitive process. Since reality testing is also accomplished by creatures who lack mental state concepts, it follows that reality testing is a nonconceptual metacognitive process. I also provide prima facie evidence that reality testing is a necessary condition for prototypical cognitive states like belief. It follows that metacognition is phylogenetically and logically prior to cognition in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Propositions, predication, and assertion.Peter Hanks - 2021 - In Piotr Stalmaszczyk (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Philosophy of Language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  10
    A Smarter Toronto: Some Reassembly Required.Bob Hanke - 2023 - Springer Verlag.
    This book bridges media, technocultural, urban and journalism studies to examine the role of journalism in relation to a smart city project on Toronto’s waterfront. From the announcement of the public-private partnership called Sidewalk Toronto to the project’s termination, a mediatized controversy unfolded. Through an assemblage approach and a comprehensive case study of the Globe and Mail and the Toronto Star, it follows the actors and chronicles the Quayside project story as a conversation about the promise and perils of a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. First-Person Propositions.Peter W. Hanks - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):155-182.
    A first-person proposition is a proposition that only a single subject can assert or believe. When I assert ‘I am on fire’ I assert a first-person proposition that only I have access to, in the sense that no one else can assert or believe this proposition. This is in contrast to third-person propositions, which can be asserted or believed by anyone.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  8.  24
    Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders' Kin.Henry T. Greely, Daniel P. Riordan, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Joanna L. Mountain - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):248-262.
    The authors examine the scientific possibility and the legal and ethical implications of using DNA forensic technology, through partial matches to DNA from crime scenes, to turn into suspects the relatives of people whose DNA profiles are in forensic databases.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  9.  21
    Early Wittgenstein on judgement.Peter W. Hanks - 2012 - In José L. Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 37.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  1
    A doutrina de negação da vontade de Schopenhauer à luz do conceito kantiano de grandezas negativas.João Gabriel Coterli Hank - 2020 - Cadernos PET-Filosofia (Parana) 18 (1).
    O texto parte das considerações que Schopenhauer faz acerca do princípio de razão suficiente do agir na sua dissertação Sobre a quadrúplice raiz do princípio de razão suficiente e da negação da Vontade de vida nos §68-70 de O mundo como vontade e como representação; e como a conduta relacionada a este conceito pode ser observada ao longo da história, seja no cristianismo ou nas religiões indianas, mostrando como é possível chegar à tal conhecimento. Em seguida, aliado ao texto kantiano (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  42
    Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda.Hank Davis & Rachelle Pérusse - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):561-579.
  12. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
  13.  39
    Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Onrushing Ethical Dilemma.Henry T. Greely - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):34-45.
    Human brain research is moving into a dilemma. The best way to understand how the human brain works is to study living human brains in living human beings, but ethical and legal standards make it d...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  14. Technology and values: essential readings.Craig Hanks (ed.) - 2010 - Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
    Cowan, Ruth Schwartz (1983) More Work for Mother: The Ironies of Household Technology from the Open Hearth to the Microwave. New York: Basic. ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15. "Tvrdé jádro" logiky a sémantické paradoxy. Konfrontace scholastického a moderního přístupu.Miroslav Hanke - 2011 - Filosofie Dnes 3 (2):21-39.
    Tvrdým jádrem“ logiky je soubor intuitivně uchopitelných fenoménů z oblasti sémantické valuace, který odolává revizím, typicky vynucovaným sémantickými paradoxy. Příspěvek se věnuje revizím logiky vytvořenými Priestem a Swyneshedem. „The hard core“ of logic is a set of intuitively conceivable phenomena regarding semantic evaluation which resists revisions (typically revisions due to semantic paradoxes). The present paper deals with Priest’s and Swyneshed’s revision of logic.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  3
    Vom Begriff zum Bild: Medienkultur nach Vilém Flusser.Michael Hanke & Steffi Winkler (eds.) - 2013 - Marburg: Tectum.
  17. The SAGE Handbook of Theoretical Psychology. (Eds.) Hank Stam and Huib Looren de Jong.Hank Stam & Huib Looren De Jong (eds.) - forthcoming - Sage.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Forward Thinking.Hank J. Goldenberg - 2013 - In Christian Hubert-Rodier (ed.), None. Hôtel des Bains Éditions.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  13
    Whitehead as Mathematical Physicist.Hank Keeton - 2004 - In T. E. Eastman & H. Keeton (eds.), Physics and Whitehead: Quantum, Process, and Experience. Suny Press. pp. 31.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  83
    The Soul Cluster: Reconsideration of a Millennia Old Concept.Hank Wesselman, Levente Móró & Ede Frecska - 2011 - World Futures 67 (2):132-153.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  45
    What will be the limits of neuroscience-based mindreading in the law.E. R. Murphy & H. T. Greely - 2011 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 635--653.
    Much of the legal and social interest in new neuroimaging techniques stems from the belief that they can deliver on the materialist understanding of the relationship between the brain and the mind. This article looks at predictions about the future both of scientific advances and of social reactions to those predictions. It looks at the likely technical limits on neuroscience-based mindreading, then at the likely limits in how the law might use such technologies. It describes three kinds of technical barriers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  22.  17
    Failure to transfer or train a numerical discrimination using sequential visual stimuli in rats.Hank Davis & Melody Albert - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):472-474.
  23.  77
    Thinking about the human neuron mouse.Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.
  24.  14
    Simultaneous numerical discriminations by rats.Hank Davis & Sheree Anne Bradford - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (2):113-116.
  25.  54
    Epistemic feelings, metacognition, and the Lima problem.Nathaniel Greely - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6803-6825.
    Epistemic feelings like tip-of-the-tongue experiences, feelings of knowing, and feelings of confidence tell us when a memory can be recalled and when a judgment was correct. Thus, they appear to be a form of metacognition, but a curious one: they tell us about content we cannot access, and the information is supplied by a feeling. Evaluativism is the claim that epistemic feelings are components of a distinct, primitive metacognitive mechanism that operates on its own set of inputs. These inputs are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  26.  13
    Reinforcement of leverholding by avoidance of shock.Hank Davis & Jo-Ann Burton - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (1):61-64.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  27.  8
    Caveman logic: the persistence of primitive thinking in a modern world.Hank Davis - 2009 - Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.
    Introduction -- The road to imperfection -- Cataloguing irrationality -- Some real life examples -- Science to the rescue -- A deeper look at what's wrong -- Assigning the blame -- Can it be fixed.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  6
    What Awakens a Sleepwalker? Advice I Would like from Langdon Winner.Hank Bromley - 1998 - Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 18 (5):374-379.
    The conference where this article was originally presented solicited recommendations for the “right questions” to ask regarding education and technology. The author of this article suggests that we already know what the right questions are for illuminating technology and its social meaning. What the author wants to know is why those questions in fact are not being asked more widely—why is widespread disinclination to enter explicit deliberation on the proper place of technology so resilient? Langdon Winner uses the term “technological (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  10
    Zajedničko čulo i pravda: Politička transformacija estetičke moći suđenja od strane Hane Ardent.Hanke Brunkhorst - 1991 - Theoria 34 (3-4):7-18.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  9
    Posts from the Pandemic: An Introduction.Hank Scotch - 2021 - Critical Inquiry 47 (S2):S1-S3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  32
    Assessing ESCROs: Yesterday and Tomorrow.Henry T. Greely - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):44-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  32.  5
    An algorithm for probabilistic planning.Nicholas Kushmerick, Steve Hanks & Daniel S. Weld - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 76 (1-2):239-286.
  33.  55
    Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
    Peter Hanks defends a new theory about the nature of propositional content, according to which the basic bearers of representational properties are particular mental or spoken actions. He explains the unity of propositions and provides new solutions to a long list of puzzles and problems in philosophy of language.
  34.  14
    The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.Henry T. Greely - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):151-160.
    Direct-to-Consumer genomics has been a controversial topic for over a decade. Much work has been done on the legal issues it raises. This article asks a different question: What will DTC genomics and its legal issues look like in ten to twenty years? After discussing the five current uses of DTC genomics, it describes three current legal issues: medical uses, privacy of genomic information, and privacy in collection and analysis of human DNA. It then suggests that changes in human genomics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.R. Alta Charo & Henry T. Greely - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):11-17.
    This essay focuses on possible nonhuman applications of CRISPR/Cas9 that are likely to be widely overlooked because they are unexpected and, in some cases, perhaps even “frivolous.” We look at five uses for “CRISPR Critters”: wild de-extinction, domestic de-extinction, personal whim, art, and novel forms of disease prevention. We then discuss the current regulatory framework and its possible limitations in those contexts. We end with questions about some deeper issues raised by the increased human control over life on earth offered (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  36.  30
    Defining chimeras...And chimeric concerns.Henry T. Greely - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):17 – 20.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  37.  15
    A Gift of Tamil: Translations from Tamil Literature, in Honor of K. Paramasivam.Hank Heifetz, Norman Cutler & Paula Richman - 1995 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 115 (2):354.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  14
    The Cilappatikāram of Iḷaṅkō Aṭikạl, An Epic of South IndiaThe Cilappatikaram of Ilanko Atikal, An Epic of South India.Hank Heifetz & R. Parthasarathy - 1999 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 119 (1):193.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  22
    Academic Chimeras?Henry T. Greely - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):13-14.
  40.  13
    Is De-extinction Special?Henry T. Greely - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (S2):S30-S36.
    I have been involved with the current interest in de‐extinction since early 2012, nearly its beginning. I have given a lot of thought to the potential risks and benefits of de‐extinction. But only recently, after deep immersion in discussions around CRISPR‐Cas9, the hottest new tool in bioscience since polymerase chain reaction, have I thought about a more fundamental question: how, if at all, is de‐extinction special? Are “revived species” just another kind of genetically modified organism, raising essentially the same general (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  41.  29
    To the Barricades!Henry T. Greely - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  42.  29
    Deduction by children and animals: Does it follow the Johnson-Laird & Byrne model?Hank Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):344-344.
  43.  25
    Observing responses and the limits of animal learning theory.Hank Davis - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):706.
  44.  12
    Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming.Henry T. Greely - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):50-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  45. Conceiving of Pain.Brendan O'Sullivan & Peter Hanks - 2008 - Dialogue 47 (2):351-376.
    In this article we aim to see how far one can get in defending the identity thesis without challenging the inference from conceivability to possibility. Our defence consists of a dilemma for the modal argument. Either “pain” is rigid or it is not. If it is not rigid, then a key premise of the modal argument can be rejected. If it is rigid, the most plausible semantic account treats “pain” as a natural-kind term that refers to its causal or historical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  43
    Response to open Peer commentaries on "thinking about the human neuron mouse".Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W4 – W6.
  47.  42
    What If? The Farther Shores of Neuroethics: Commentary on “Neuroscience May Supersede Ethics and Law”.Henry T. Greely - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):439-446.
    Neuroscience is clearly making enormous progress toward understanding how human brains work. The implications of this progress for ethics, law, society, and culture are much less clear. Some have argued that neuroscience will lead to vast changes, superseding much of law and ethics. The likely limits to the explanatory power of neuroscience argue against that position, as do the limits to the social relevance of what neuroscience will be able to explain. At the same time neuroscience is likely to change (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48.  6
    On the undecidability of probabilistic planning and related stochastic optimization problems.Omid Madani, Steve Hanks & Anne Condon - 2003 - Artificial Intelligence 147 (1-2):5-34.
  49.  17
    An analysis of two extinction procedures for leverpress escape behavior.Hank Davis & Jo-Ann Burton - 1975 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 5 (3):201-204.
  50.  25
    A methodological critique of research on “superstitious” behavior.Hank Davis, James Hubbard & Douglas Reberg - 1973 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1 (6):447-449.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 334