Results for 'Hank Greely'

285 found
Order:
  1.  50
    Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.Christine Grady, Lisa Eckstein, Ben Berkman, Dan Brock, Robert Cook-Deegan, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Hank Greely, Mats G. Hansson, Sara Hull, Scott Kim, Bernie Lo, Rebecca Pentz, Laura Rodriguez, Carol Weil, Benjamin S. Wilfond & David Wendler - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):34-42.
    Different types of consent are used to obtain human biospecimens for future research. This variation has resulted in confusion regarding what research is permitted, inadvertent constraints on future research, and research proceeding without consent. The National Institutes of Health Clinical Center's Department of Bioethics held a workshop to consider the ethical acceptability of addressing these concerns by using broad consent for future research on stored biospecimens. Multiple bioethics scholars, who have written on these issues, discussed the reasons for consent, the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   55 citations  
  2.  12
    Scientific and Ethical Uncertainties in Brain Organoid Research.Arun Sharma, Peter Zuk & Christopher Thomas Scott - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):48-51.
    Hank Greely’s target article, “Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Onrushing Ethical Dilemma” reviews the manifold scientific and ethical questions surrounding models of human brains used i...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. The SAGE Handbook of Theoretical Psychology. (Eds.) Hank Stam and Huib Looren de Jong.Hank Stam & Huib Looren De Jong (eds.) - forthcoming - Sage.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  13
    Epistemic Feelings, Metacognition, and the Lima Problem.Nathaniel Greely - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):6803-6825.
    Epistemic feelings like tip-of-the-tongue experiences, feelings of knowing, and feelings of confidence tell us when a memory can be recalled and when a judgment was correct. Thus, they appear to be a form of metacognition, but a curious one: they tell us about content we cannot access, and the information is supplied by a feeling. Evaluativism is the claim that epistemic feelings are components of a distinct, primitive metacognitive mechanism that operates on its own set of inputs. These inputs are (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  11
    Propositional Content.Peter Hanks - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
    Peter Hanks defends a new theory about the nature of propositional content, according to which the basic bearers of representational properties are particular mental or spoken actions. He explains the unity of propositions and provides new solutions to a long list of puzzles and problems in philosophy of language.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   95 citations  
  6. How Wittgenstein Defeated Russell’s Multiple Relation Theory of Judgment.Peter W. Hanks - 2007 - Synthese 154 (1):121 - 146.
    In 1913 Wittgenstein raised an objection to Russell’s multiple relation theory of judgment that eventually led Russell to abandon his theory. As he put it in the Tractatus, the objection was that “the correct explanation of the form of the proposition, ‘A makes the judgement p’, must show that it is impossible for a judgement to be a piece of nonsense. (Russell’s theory does not satisfy this requirement,” (5.5422). This objection has been widely interpreted to concern type restrictions on the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  7.  78
    Towards Responsible Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs by the Healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
  8.  32
    Numerical Competence in Animals: Definitional Issues, Current Evidence, and a New Research Agenda.Hank Davis & Rachelle Pérusse - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):561-579.
  9. First-Person Propositions.Peter W. Hanks - 2013 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (1):155-182.
    A first-person proposition is a proposition that only a single subject can assert or believe. When I assert ‘I am on fire’ I assert a first-person proposition that only I have access to, in the sense that no one else can assert or believe this proposition. This is in contrast to third-person propositions, which can be asserted or believed by anyone.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  10. What Are the Primary Bearers of Truth?Peter Hanks - 2013 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 43 (5):558-574.
    (2013). What are the primary bearers of truth? Canadian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 43, Essays on the Nature of Propositions, pp. 558-574.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  11.  15
    Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Onrushing Ethical Dilemma.Henry T. Greely - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):34-45.
    Human brain research is moving into a dilemma. The best way to understand how the human brain works is to study living human brains in living human beings, but ethical and legal standards make it d...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  12. Recent Work on Propositions.Peter Hanks - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):469-486.
    Propositions, the abstract, truth-bearing contents of sentences and beliefs, continue to be the focus of healthy debates in philosophy of language and metaphysics. This article is a critical survey of work on propositions since the mid-90s, with an emphasis on newer work from the past decade. Topics to be covered include a substitution puzzle about propositional designators, two recent arguments against propositions, and two new theories about the nature of propositions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  13.  65
    Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse.Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.
  14.  18
    But I Don’T Eat That Much Meat.Hank Rothgerber - 2019 - Society and Animals 27 (2):150-173.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  15.  73
    On Cancellation.Peter Hanks - 2019 - Synthese 196 (4):1385-1402.
    In Hanks I defend a theory of propositions that locates the source of propositional unity in acts of predication that people perform in thought and speech. On my account, these acts of predication are judgmental or assertoric in character, and they commit the speaker to things being the way they are represented to be in the act of predication. This leads to a problem about negations, disjunctions, conditionals, and other kinds of embeddings. When you assert that a is F or (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  16.  33
    What Will Be the Limits of Neuroscience-Based Mindreading in the Law.E. R. Murphy & H. T. Greely - 2011 - In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 635--653.
    Much of the legal and social interest in new neuroimaging techniques stems from the belief that they can deliver on the materialist understanding of the relationship between the brain and the mind. This article looks at predictions about the future both of scientific advances and of social reactions to those predictions. It looks at the likely technical limits on neuroscience-based mindreading, then at the likely limits in how the law might use such technologies. It describes three kinds of technical barriers (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17.  5
    Is De-Extinction Special?Henry T. Greely - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (S2):S30-S36.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  73
    The Explanatory Role of Propositions.Peter Hanks - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):370-379.
    © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Analysis Trust. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] of the best arguments in Trenton Merricks’s book Propositions – and there are many excellent arguments to choose from – occurs near the end, where he argues that if it is primitive that propositions represent things as being various ways then we should reject the view that propositions are structured and have constituents. As Merricks shows, combining these (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19.  8
    Autocontingencies: A Model for Subtle Behavioral Control.Hank Davis, John Memmott & Harry M. Hurwitz - 1975 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3):169-188.
  20.  19
    The Social Chicken and the Technological Egg: Educational Computing an the Technology/Society Divide.Hank Bromley - 1997 - Educational Theory 47 (1):51-65.
  21.  18
    Human Genomics Research: New Challenges for Research Ethics.Henry T. Greely - 2001 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 44 (2):221-229.
  22.  7
    Failure to Transfer or Train a Numerical Discrimination Using Sequential Visual Stimuli in Rats.Hank Davis & Melody Albert - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (6):472-474.
  23.  7
    Simultaneous Numerical Discriminations by Rats.Hank Davis & Sheree Anne Bradford - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (2):113-116.
  24.  42
    Indoctrination and the Space of Reasons.Chris Hanks - 2008 - Educational Theory 58 (2):193-212.
    The “paradox of indoctrination” has proven to be a persistent problem in discussions of the cultivation of autonomy through education. In short, if indoctrination means instilling beliefs without reasons, and if children lack the rational capacity to evaluate reasons, how can that capacity be cultivated without indoctrination? Some educational theorists have relied on a transcendental justification of rational autonomy that avoids indoctrination, while others have accepted that some indoctrination is inevitable, focusing instead on defending acceptable forms of indoctrination. In this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  23
    Assessing ESCROs: Yesterday and Tomorrow.Henry T. Greely - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):44-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  26. Structured Propositions as Types.Peter W. Hanks - 2011 - Mind 120 (477):11-52.
    In this paper I defend an account of the nature of propositional content according to which the proposition expressed by a declarative sentence is a certain type of action a speaker performs in uttering that sentence. On this view, the semantic contents of proper names turn out to be types of reference acts. By carefully individuating these types, it is possible to provide new solutions to Frege’s puzzles about names in identity- and belief-sentences.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   81 citations  
  27.  7
    Reinforcement of Leverholding by Avoidance of Shock.Hank Davis & Jo-Ann Burton - 1976 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (1):61-64.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  28.  4
    Signaling Through Focal Adhesion Kinase.Steven K. Hanks & Thomas R. Polte - 1997 - Bioessays 19 (2):137-145.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  29.  84
    CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.R. Alta Charo & Henry T. Greely - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):11-17.
    This essay focuses on possible nonhuman applications of CRISPR/Cas9 that are likely to be widely overlooked because they are unexpected and, in some cases, perhaps even “frivolous.” We look at five uses for “CRISPR Critters”: wild de-extinction, domestic de-extinction, personal whim, art, and novel forms of disease prevention. We then discuss the current regulatory framework and its possible limitations in those contexts. We end with questions about some deeper issues raised by the increased human control over life on earth offered (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  30.  20
    Bipolarity and Sense in the Tractatus.Peter Hanks - 2014 - Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (9).
    Although the terms ‘poles’, ‘bipolar’, and ‘bipolarity’ do not appear in the Tractatus, it is widely held that Wittgenstein maintained his commitment to bipolarity in the Tractatus. As it is usually understood, the principle of bipolarity is that every proposition must be capable of being true and capable of being false, which rules out propositions that are necessarily true or necessarily false. Here I argue that Wittgenstein was committed to bipolarity in the Tractatus, but getting a clear view of this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  31.  10
    Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders' Kin.Henry T. Greely, Daniel P. Riordan, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Joanna L. Mountain - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):248-262.
    “The sins of the fathers are to be laid upon the children.”Just after midnight on March 21, 2003, a drunk stood on a footbridge over a motorway in a village in Surrey in southern England. After eight pints of beer, he was drunk enough to decide to drop a brick from the overpass into traffic to see if he could hit something; unfortunately, he was not so drunk that he missed. The brick crashed through the windshield on the driver's side (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32.  17
    Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders' Kin.Henry T. Greely, Daniel P. Riordan, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Joanna L. Mountain - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):248-262.
    The authors examine the scientific possibility and the legal and ethical implications of using DNA forensic technology, through partial matches to DNA from crime scenes, to turn into suspects the relatives of people whose DNA profiles are in forensic databases.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  38
    Identity Politics and Critical Pedagogy.Hank Bromley - 1989 - Educational Theory 39 (3):207-223.
  34.  20
    Defining Chimeras...And Chimeric Concerns.Henry T. Greely - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):17 – 20.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  35. The Content–Force Distinction.Peter W. Hanks - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 134 (2):141-164.
  36.  16
    Academic Chimeras?Henry T. Greely - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):13-14.
  37.  20
    To the Barricades!Henry T. Greely - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  38.  36
    Propositional Content by Peter Hanks (Review). [REVIEW]Peter Pagin - 2019 - Language 95 (2):377-380.
  39.  4
    Nonmonotonic Logic and Temporal Projection.Steve Hanks & Drew McDermott - 1987 - Artificial Intelligence 33 (3):379-412.
  40. Replies to Glick, Hanks, and Magidor.Trenton Merricks - 2017 - Analysis 77 (2):393-411.
  41.  29
    John Mair on Semantic Paradoxes.Miroslav Hanke - 2013 - Studia Neoaristotelica 10 (1):50-87.
    John Mair was an influential post-medieval scholar. This paper focuses on his Tractatus insolubilium, in which he proposed semantic analysis of self-referential phenomena, in particular on his solution to alethic and correspondence paradoxes and his treatment of their general semantic aspects as well as particular applications. His solution to paradoxes is based on the so-called “network evaluation”, i.e. on a semantics which defines the concepts of truth and correspondence with reality in contextual terms. Consequently, the relation between semantic valuation, synonymy (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  14
    Deduction by Children and Animals: Does It Follow the Johnson-Laird & Byrne Model?Hank Davis - 1993 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (2):344-344.
  43.  14
    Observing Responses and the Limits of Animal Learning Theory.Hank Davis - 1983 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6 (4):706.
  44.  5
    Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming.Henry T. Greely - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):50-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  45.  23
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Thinking About the Human Neuron Mouse".Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W4 – W6.
  46.  9
    The Role of Control in Attributing Intentional Agency to Inanimate Objects.Justin Barrett & Amanda Hankes Johnson - 2003 - Journal of Cognition and Culture 3 (3):208-217.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  47. The Social Effects of Advances in Neuroscience: Legal Problems, Legal Perspectives.Henry Greely - 2005 - In Judy Illes (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, J Illes (Ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48.  30
    What If? The Farther Shores of Neuroethics: Commentary on “Neuroscience May Supersede Ethics and Law”.Henry T. Greely - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):439-446.
    Neuroscience is clearly making enormous progress toward understanding how human brains work. The implications of this progress for ethics, law, society, and culture are much less clear. Some have argued that neuroscience will lead to vast changes, superseding much of law and ethics. The likely limits to the explanatory power of neuroscience argue against that position, as do the limits to the social relevance of what neuroscience will be able to explain. At the same time neuroscience is likely to change (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49.  15
    Some First Steps Toward Responsible Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs by the Healthy.Henry T. Greely - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):39 - 41.
  50.  3
    Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.Susan M. Wolf, Pilar N. Ossorio, Susan A. Berry, Henry T. Greely, Amy L. McGuire, Michelle A. Penny & Sharon F. Terry - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):69-86.
    Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 285