80 found
Order:
  1. Value-Free Science?: Ideals and Illusions.Harold Kincaid, John Dupré & Alison Wylie (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
    It has long been thought that science is our best hope for realizing objective knowledge, but that, to deliver on this promise, it must be value free. Things are not so simple, however, as recent work in science studies makes clear. The contributors to this volume investigate where and how values are involved in science, and examine the implications of this involvement for ideals of objectivity.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  2. Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds.Harold Kincaid & Jacqueline Anne Sullivan - 2014 - In Harold Kincaid & Jacqueline Anne Sullivan (eds.), Classifying Psychopathology: Mental Kinds and Natural Kinds. MIT Press. pp. 1-10.
    In this volume, leading philosophers of psychiatry examine psychiatric classification systems, including the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, asking whether current systems are sufficient for effective diagnosis, treatment, and research. Doing so, they take up the question of whether mental disorders are natural kinds, grounded in something in the outside world. Psychiatric categories based on natural kinds should group phenomena in such a way that they are subject to the same type of causal explanations and respond similarly to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Putting Inference to the Best Explanation in its Place.Timothy Day & Harold Kincaid - 1994 - Synthese 98 (2):271-295.
    This paper discusses the nature and the status of inference to the best explanation. We outline the foundational role given IBE by its defenders and the arguments of critics who deny it any place at all ; argue that, on the two main conceptions of explanation, IBE cannot be a foundational inference rule ; sketch an account of IBE that makes it contextual and dependent on substantive empirical assumptions, much as simplicity seems to be ; show how that account avoids (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
  4. Reduction, Explanation, and Individualism.Harold Kincaid - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (4):492-513.
    This paper contributes to the recently renewed debate over methodological individualism (MI) by carefully sorting out various individualist claims and by making use of recent work on reduction and explanation outside the social sciences. My major focus is on individualist claims about reduction and explanation. I argue that reductionist versions of MI fail for much the same reasons that mental predicates cannot be reduced to physical predicates and that attempts to establish reducibility by weakening the requirements for reduction also fail. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  5.  9
    Open Empirical and Methodological Issues in the Individualism-Holism Debate.Harold Kincaid - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):1127-1138.
    I first briefly argue that some issues in the individualism-holism debate have been fairly clearly settled and others are still plagued by unclarity. The main argument of the article is that there is a set of clear empirical issues around the holism-individualism debate that are central problems in current social science research. Those include questions about when we can be holist and how individualist we can be in social explanation.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  65
    Scientific Metaphysics.Don Ross, James Ladyman & Harold Kincaid (eds.) - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
    Original essays by leading philosophers of science explore the question of whether metaphysics can and should be naturalized--conducted as part of natural science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  38
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science.Harold Kincaid (ed.) - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
    This Handbook is a major, comprehensive look at the key ideas in the field, is guided by several principles.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8. Defending Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):56?83.
    This article defends laws in the social sciences. Arguments against social laws are considered and rejected based on the "open" nature of social theory, the multiple realizability of social predicates, the macro and/or teleological nature of social laws, and the inadequacies of belief-desire psychology. The more serious problem that social laws are usually qualified ceteris paribus is then considered. How the natural sciences handle ceteris paribus laws is discussed and it is argued that such procedures are possible in the social (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9. Medical Models of Addiction.Harold Kincaid & Jacqueline Anne Sullivan - 2010 - In Kincaid Ross (ed.), What is Addiction?
    Biomedical science has been remarkably successful in explaining illness by categorizing diseases and then by identifying localizable lesions such as a virus and neoplasm in the body that cause those diseases. Not surprisingly, researchers have aspired to apply this powerful paradigm to addiction. So, for example, in a review of the neuroscience of addiction literature, Hyman and Malenka (2001, p. 695) acknowledge a general consensus among addiction researchers that “[a]ddiction can appropriately be considered as a chronic medical illness.” Like other (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  62
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics.Harold Kincaid & Don Ross (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics is a cutting-edge reference work to philosophical issues in the practice of economics. It is motivated by the view that there is more to economics than general equilibrium theory, and that the philosophy of economics should reflect the diversity of activities and topics that currently occupy economists. Contributions in the Handbook are thus closely tied to ongoing theoretical and empirical concerns in economics. Contributors include both philosophers of science and economists. Chapters fall into (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11.  9
    Debating the Reality of Social Classes.Harold Kincaid - 2016 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 46 (2):189-209.
    This article first surveys a significant set of issues that are intertwined in asking whether social classes are real. It distinguishes two different notions of class: class as organized social entities and class as types of individuals based on individual characteristics. There is good evidence for some classes as social entities—ruling classes and underclasses in some societies—but other classes in contemporary society are sometimes best thought of in terms of types, not social entities. Implications are drawn for pluralist accounts of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  15
    Causal Modeling, Mechanism, and Probability in Epidemiology.Harold Kincaid - 2011 - In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press. pp. 170--190.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  41
    Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (4):575-593.
    Advances in molecular biology have generally been taken to support the claim that biology is reducible to chemistry. I argue against that claim by looking in detail at a number of central results from molecular biology and showing that none of them supports reduction because (1) their basic predicates have multiple realizations, (2) their chemical realization is context-sensitive and (3) their explanations often presuppose biological facts rather than eliminate them. I then consider the heuristic and confirmational implications of irreducibility and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  14.  40
    Do We Need Theory to Study Disease?: Lessons From Cancer Research and Their Implications for Mental Illness.Harold Kincaid - 2008 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (3):367-378.
  15. Structural Realism and the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):720-731.
    After sorting different structuralist claims, I argue that structural realist ideas are instantiated in the social sciences, providing both clarification of social science research and support for some components of structural realism. My main focus is on three distinct ways that the social sciences can be about structural relations—exemplified by claims about social structure, reduced form structures in causal modeling, and equilibrium explanations—and on the implication of structuralist ideas for thinking about issues concerning causal explanation and nonreductive pictures of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16.  12
    Distributed Cognition and the Will: Individual Volition and Social Context.David Spurrett, Don Ross, Harold Kincaid & Lynn Stephens (eds.) - 2007 - MIT Press.
    Philosophers and behavioral scientists discuss what, if anything, of the traditionalconcept of individual conscious will can survive recent scientific discoveries that humandecision-making is distributed across different brain processes and ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17. There Are Laws in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - In Christopher Hitchcock (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science. Blackwell. pp. 168--186.
  18.  61
    What Is Addiction?Don Ross, Harold Kincaid & David Spurrett (eds.) - 2010 - The MIT Press.
    Leading addiction researchers survey the latest findings in addiction science, countering the simplistic cultural stereotypes of the addict.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  8
    Some Issues Concerning the Nature of Economic Explanation.Harold Kincaid - 2012 - In Uskali Mäki, Dov M. Gabbay, Paul Thagard & John Woods (eds.), Philosophy of Economics. North Holland. pp. 137.
  20.  90
    Contextualism, Explanation and the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - Philosophical Explorations 7 (3):201 – 218.
    Debates about explanation in the social sciences often proceed without any clear idea what an 'account' of explanation should do. In this paper I take a stance - what I will call contextualism - that denies there are purely formal and conceptual constraints on explanation and takes standards of explanation to be substantive empirical claims, paradigmatically claims about causation. I then use this standpoint to argue for position on issues in the philosophy of social science concerning reduction, idealized models, social (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  81
    Supervenience and Explanation.Harold Kincaid - 1988 - Synthese 77 (November):251-81.
    This paper explores the explanatory adequacy of lower-level theories when their higher-level counterparts are irreducible. If some state or entity described by a high-level theory supervenes upon and is realized in events, entities, etc. described by the relevant lower-level theory, does the latter fully explain the higher-level event even if the higher-level theory is irreducible? While the autonomy of the special sciences and the success of various eliminativist programs depends in large part on how we answer this question, neither the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  22.  73
    How Should Philosophy of Social Science Proceed?Harold Kincaid - 2012 - Metascience 21 (2):391-394.
    How should philosophy of social science proceed? Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-4 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9592-7 Authors Harold Kincaid, Department of Philosophy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 900 13th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35294-1260, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  31
    Supervenience Doesn't Entail Reducibility.Harold Kincaid - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):343-56.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  24. Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Science.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - Blackwell.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  10
    Mechanisms, Causal Modeling, and the Limitations of Traditional Multiple Regression.Harold Kincaid - 2012 - In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 46.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Establishing Medical Reality: Methodological and Metaphysical Issues in Philosophy of Medicine.Harold Kincaid & Jennifer McKitrick (eds.) - 2007 - Springer Publishing Company.
  27.  14
    Establishing Medical Reality: Essays in the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Biomedical Science.Kincaid Harold & McKitrick Jennifer (eds.) - 2007 - Spinger.
    This volume approaches the philosophy of medicine from the broad naturalist perspective that holds that philosophy must be continuous with, constrained by, and ...
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  57
    Eliminativism and Methodological Individualism.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - Philosophy of Science 57 (1):141-148.
    Tuomela (this issue, pp. 96-103) raises several objections to the analysis and critique of methodological individualism in my (1986). In what follows I reply to those criticisms, arguing, among other things, that: (1) the alleged reductions provided by Tuomela and others fail, because they either presuppose rather than eliminate social predicates or do not avoid the problem of multiple realizations; (2) supervenience does not guarantee that the social sciences are reducible, because merely describing supervenieence bases leaves numerous questions unanswered, and (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. LEVELS OF EXPLANATION AND THE UNIT OF SELECTION: A Review of Genes, Organisms, and Populations, Edited by Robert Brandon and Richard Burian. MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1984.Harold Kincaid - 1986 - Behaviorism 14 (1):69-76.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  19
    Global Arguments and Local Realism About the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):678.
    This paper argues that realism issue in the social sciences is not one that can be decided by general philosophical arguments that evaluate entire domains at once. The realism issue is instead many different empirical issues. To defend these claims, I sort issues that are often run together, explicate and criticize several standard realist and antirealist arguments about the social sciences, and use the example of the productive/nonproductive distinction to illustrate the approach to realism questions that I favor.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  44
    The Empirical Nature of the Individualism-Holism Dispute.Harold Kincaid - 1993 - Synthese 97 (2):229 - 247.
  32. Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences: Analyzing Controversies in Social Research.Harold Kincaid - 1998 - Mind 107 (427):672-675.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33.  24
    15 Methodological Individualism and Economics.Harold Kincaid - 2004 - In John Bryan Davis & Alain Marciano (eds.), The Elgar Companion to Economics and Philosophy. Edward Elgar. pp. 299.
  34.  46
    Assessing Functional Explanations in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:341-354.
    Functionalism is a dominant but widely criticized perspective in social theory; my goal in this paper is to help clarify what functionalists claim, identify what would count as evidence for those claims and evaluate some standard criticisms. Functionalism relies essentially on functional explanations of the form "A exists in order to B." I point out problems with previous accounts of such explanations, offer an improved account, and discuss in detail evidence that might confirm such explanations and its difficulties. I argue (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  37
    The Empirical Presuppositions of Metaphysical Explanations in Economics.Harold Kincaid - 1995 - The Monist 78 (3):368-385.
    Discusses the empirical presuppositions of the metaphysical explanations in economics. Common arguments among philosophers of economics; Helen Boss’ arguments on productive-nonproductive distinction in economics; Domains of different economic theories; Methodological individualism in economics.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  23
    Formal Rationality and its Pernicious Effects on the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):67-88.
    This article argues that a particular notion of rationality, more exactly a specific notion of legitimate inference, is presupposed by much work in the social sciences to their detriment. The author describes the notion of rationality he has in mind, explains why it is misguided, identifies where and how it affects social research, and illustrates why that research is weaker as a result. The notion of legitimate inference the author has in mind is one that believes inferences are guided by (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  5
    Taking Philosophy of Science to Economics.Harold Kincaid - forthcoming - Metascience:1-4.
  38.  21
    Confirmation, Complexity and Social Laws.Harold Kincaid - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:299-307.
    I defend the prospect of good science in the social sciences by looking at the obstacles to social laws. I criticize traditional approaches, which rule for or against social laws on primarily conceptual grounds, and argue that only a close analysis of actual empirical research can decide the issue. To that end, I focus on problems caused by the ceteris paribus nature of social generalizations, outline a variety of ways those problems might be handled, and then examine in detail the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  45
    Review of Jon Elster, Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences[REVIEW]Harold Kincaid - 2007 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (11).
  40.  16
    Functionalist Successes and Excesses in the Social Sciences.Harold Kincaid - 2002 - Analyse & Kritik 24 (1):60-71.
    This paper presents a model of functional explanations as a species of ordinary causal explanation and argues that they are widespread for understandable reasons in the social sciences. The remainder of the paper then looks at specific functional explanations in the social research and examines the prospects and problems for those accounts.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Functional Explanation and Evolutionary Social Science.Harold Kincaid - manuscript
    From their conception to the present, the social sciences have invoked a kind of explanation that looks suspect by the standards of the natural sciences. They explain why social practices exist by reference to the purpose or needs they serve. Yet the purposes invoked are generally not the explicit purposes or needs of any individual but of society or social groups. For example, Durkheim claimed that the division of labor in society exists in order to promote social solidarity and Marx (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  18
    Can Neoclassical Economics Be Defended on Grounds of Explanatory Power?Harold Kincaid - 1995 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 34 (S1):155-177.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  15
    Making Philosophy of Economics Relevant.Harold Kincaid - 2011 - Journal of Economic Methodology 18 (01):79-81.
  44.  23
    The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Nancy Cartwright. Cambridge University Press, 1999, IX + 240 Pages. [REVIEW]Harold Kincaid - 2003 - Economics and Philosophy 19 (1):167-170.
  45.  2
    Supervenience Doesn’T Entail Reducibility.Harold Kincaid - 1987 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):343-356.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  10
    Introduction to Establishing Medical Reality: Essays in the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Biomedical Science.Harold Kincaid & Jennifer McKitrick - 2007 - In Harold Kincaid & Jennifer McKitrick (eds.), Establishing Medical Reality. Springer. pp. 1-11.
    Medicine has been a very fruitful source of significant issues for philosophy over the last 30 years. The vast majority of the issues discussed have been normative—they have been problems in morality and political philosophy that now make up the field called bioethics. However, biomedical science presents many other philosophical questions that have gotten relatively little attention, particularly topics in metaphysics, epistemology and philosophy of science. This volume focuses on problems in these areas as they surface in biomedical science. Important (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  8
    Introduction: Doing Philosophy of Social Science.Harold Kincaid - 2012 - In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Oxford University Press. pp. 1.
  48. Philosophie des Rechts: Die Vorlesung von 1819/20 in Einer Nachschrift. [REVIEW]Harold Kincaid - 1985 - Noûs 19 (3):475-476.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  10
    Hegel on External Relations and Partial Understanding.Harold Kincaid - 1991 - Idealistic Studies 21 (1):29-47.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  18
    A More Sophisticated Merton.Harold Kincaid - 2009 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):266-271.
    An alternative account of Merton to that provided by Turner is sketched. It shows strong similarities to some quite plausible contemporary understandings of science in general. Given this reading, it would seem that Merton did not drastically change his position nor does it suffer from the ambiguities that Turner describes. Key Words: theory • naturalism • causation • functional explanation.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 80