Order:
Disambiguations
Harry Weger [7]Harry Weger Jr [1]
  1.  18
    Structure of Persuasive Communication and Elaboration Likelihood Model.Katarzyna Budzynska & Harry Weger Jr - unknown
    The aim of the paper is to propose a framework for the structure of persuasive communica-tion based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model by Petty and Cacioppo, the Inference Anchoring Theory by Budzynska and Reed and the Interpersonal Argumentation Model by Budzynska. The ELM suggests that there are two routes to persuasion: central and peripheral. IAT assumes that com-munication acts generate their contents and inferences by means of illocutionary connections. The model of IP-argumentation provides the general representation of arguments in which (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  12
    Dale Hample: Interpersonal Arguing: Peter Lang Publishing, 305 Pp.Harry Weger - 2019 - Argumentation 33 (4):605-609.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  40
    Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (Eds): Pondering on Problems of Argumentation: Twenty Essays on Theoretical Issues. [REVIEW]Harry Weger - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (1):115-122.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  10
    Introduction.Harry Weger - 2015 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 4 (1):1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  25
    Pragma-Dialectical Theory and Interpersonal Interaction Outcomes: Unproductive Interpersonal Behavior as Violations of Rules for Critical Discussion.Harry Weger - 2001 - Argumentation 15 (3):313-330.
    The purpose of this research review is to examine the usefulness of reconstructing problematic interpersonal conflict behavior as violations of rules for critical discussions. Dialectical reconstruction of interpersonal conflict behavior sheds light on the ways in which dialectical fallacies influence not only the course of a critical discussion, but also the personal and relationship outcomes experienced by arguers. Conflict sequences such as cross complaining and demand/withdraw are shown to be problematic, in part, because they prevent parties from resolving their difference (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  24
    Responses to an Opponent’s Nonverbal Behavior in a Televised Debate: Audience Perceptions of Credibility and Likeability.Harry Weger, John S. Seiter, Kimberly A. Jacobs & Valerie Akbulut - 2013 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 2 (2):179-203.
    This study examined audience perceptions of a political candidate’s credibility and likeability as a function of varying the candidate’s responses to an opponent’s nonverbal disparagement during a televised debate. 412 participants watched a purported televised debate between candidates for mayor in a small city in Utah. In all six versions, one debater engaged in strong nonverbal disagreement during his opponent’s opening statement. His opponent responded to the nonverbal behavior with one of six decreasingly polite messages. Results indicated that more direct (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  13
    Scrutinizing Argumentation in Practice: Frans H. Van Eemeren and Bart Garssen : Amsterdan, NL: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 342 Pp, $149.00 , Hardcover.Harry Weger - 2017 - Argumentation 31 (1):209-211.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark