5 found
Order:
See also
Henrik Andersson
Lund University
  1.  51
    Parity and Comparability—a Concern Regarding Chang’s Chaining Argument.Henrik Andersson - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (1):245-253.
    According to Ruth Chang the three standard positive value relations: “better than”, “worse than” and “equally good” do not fully exhaust the conceptual space for positive value relations. According to her, there is room for a fourth positive value relation, which she calls “parity”. Her argument for parity comes in three parts. First, she argues that there are items that are not related by the standard three value relations. Second, that these items are not incomparable, and third, that the phenomena (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  15
    A More Plausible Collapsing Principle.Henrik Andersson & Anders Herlitz - 2018 - Theoria 84 (4):325-336.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  42
    Propping Up the Collapsing Principle.Henrik Andersson - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (3):475-486.
    According to a standard account of incomparability, two value bearers are incomparable if it is false that there holds a positive value relation between them. Due to the vagueness of the comparative predicates it may also be indeterminate as to which relation that holds - for each relation it is neither true nor false that it holds. John Broome has argued that indeterminacy cannot coexist with incomparability and since there seems to exist indeterminacy there cannot exist incomparability. At the core (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4.  25
    Vagueness and Goodness Simpliciter.Henrik Andersson - 2016 - Ratio 29 (4):378-394.
    Recently a lot has been written on the topic of value incomparability. While there is disagreement on how we are to understand incomparability, most seem to accept Ruth Chang's claim that all comparisons must proceed in some specific respect. Call this the Requirement for Specification. Interestingly, even though most seem to accept this requirement, next to nothing has been written on it. In this paper I focus on the requirement and discuss two different but related topics. First, an important observation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Pietetsfullt hanterande av mänskliga kvarlevor.Henrik Andersson & Frits Gåvertsson - 2018 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 39 (4):15-27.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark