The author examines Hume's Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion to discover a variant of the usual teleological argument that abandons reliance on analogical reasoning. This second version, never refuted in the Dialogues, is termed "pragmaticist" in Peirce's sense. It relies on an abductive hypothesis that claims not logical proof but the power of instinctual conviction. The Dialogues' espousal of sound common sense may then be viewed as an imperfectly articulated precursor of Peirce's pragmaticist argument for the reality rather than the existence (...) of God. (shrink)

The author uses Eco's The Name of the Rose to pose the problem of the relation between the infinite aesthetic play of semiotics and pragmatic moral responsibility for human conduct. This problem is addressed through Peirce's semiotic theory, which not only links signs to objects, but situates them in an interpretant relation that is formative of human conduct. Religion is advanced as the paradigm of this relation; a "categorial semiotic" where concrete symbolic acts move beyond nominalism through real experience of (...) the divine, to which "fallibilistic" doctrines are always subject. (shrink)

American philosophy of religion makes possible a theological cosmology which allows us to conceive a foundation for the reality ofthe symbolism ofGod and creation, the processual integration of subject-object perspectives, the connections between nature and spirit, and those between faith and action. This raises the possibility of amending the deficit in the German theological tradition as regards theology of creation, that is, as the presupposition for a necessary ethics of creation. Constitutive factors in this connection are the christological elements of (...) the love of God which are made concrete via faith, thought, and act in a metaphysically and evolutionistically understood world-process. (shrink)