10 found
Order:
See also
Hynek Janoušek
Institute Of Philosophy, Czech Academy Of Sciences
  1. The Prague School.Hynek Janoušek & Robin Rollinger - 2017 - In Uriah Kriegel (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Franz Brentano and the Brentano School. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 313-322.
    The name the “Prague school of Brentano” refers to three generations of thinkers who temporarily or permanently lived in Prague, bound together by teacher/student relationships, and who accepted the main views of Franz Brentano’s philosophy. This chapter discusses central aspects of the philosophical work done in the School.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  19
    Husserl on Hume.Hynek Janoušek & Dan Zahavi - 2019 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 28 (3):615-635.
    This article offers an account of the development of Husserl’s assessment of Hume’s position in the history of philosophy. In Husserl’s early treatment of Hume, Husserl’s interpretation was shaped...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  37
    Judgmental Force and Assertion in Brentano and Early Husserl.Hynek Janoušek - 2015 - Studia Phaenomenologica 15:105-128.
    The goal of the present article is to describe the Brentanian background of several topics concerning judgments and assertions in Husserl’s Logical Investigations. Why did Husserl abandon Brentano’s theory of two judgmental forces? Is the “is true/false” to be understood as an expression of judgmental force or as a logical predication? Is a “common expression” of the objective validity of judgment equivalent with our expression of our belief in that validity? Does the linguistic sign of the logical force manifest this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  7
    Consciousness of Judging: Katkov’s Critique of Marty’s State of Affairs and Brentano’s Description of Judgement.Hynek Janoušek - 2017 - In Hamid Taieb & Guillaume Fréchette (eds.), Mind and Language – on the Philosophy of Anton Marty. De Gruyter. pp. 241-260.
  5. Franz Brentano.Denis Fisette, Guillaume Frechette & Hynek Janoušek (eds.) - 2019 - Springer.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Franz Brentano's Philosophy After Hundred Years. From History of Philosophy to Reism.Denis Fisette, Guillaume Frechette & Hynek Janoušek (eds.) - forthcoming - New York: Springer.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Aspects of Kant's Resolution Synthetic and Analytical Court.Hynek Janousek - 2012 - Reflexe: Filosoficky Casopis 43:79-100.
    The study aims to show that the Kantian distinction of synthetic and analytical resolution of the courts is originally epistemic and not purely logical. Proof of this proposition is done so that in the first step are distinguished two types of synthetic and analytical predicate relation to the subject - logical-semantic and epistemic. Furthermore, the examples demonstrated that Kant was familiar cases in courts, which are found only logico-semantic synthetic or analytic connection of concepts in trials. Consequently, Kant care for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Book Review. [REVIEW]Hynek Janousek - 2010 - Reflexe: Filosoficky Casopis 38:109-113.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Husserlova nauka o celku a části a její význam pro fenomenologii.Hynek Janousek - 2009 - Reflexe: Filosoficky Casopis 36:57-75.
    Ve své studii se pokouším zdůvodnit význam Husserlova základního rozlišení mezi samostatnými a nesamostatnými částmi v celku jeho filosofování. K tomu je potřeba popsat, jak toto rozlišení vyrůstá z obecné systematiky Logických zkoumání a jak je touto systematikou jakožto nástroj jejího vypracování předpokládáno. Abychom tento rozdíl pochopili musíme jej nejdříve zasadit do kontextu Husserlovy čisté logiky. V ní tento rozdíl patří zprvu do oblasti čisté logiky, která se nazývá formální ontologií, neboť každý předmět může být chápán jako aktuální nebo možná (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Pojednání v Humově reflexi.Hynek Janousek - 2010 - Reflexe: Filosoficky Casopis 38:91-97.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark