Search results for 'Ian Jarvie Jesus Zamora Bonilla' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. I. C. Jarvie, Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (eds.) (2011). The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  27
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2012). Brian Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information (Jesús Zamora Bonilla). Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Ian Jarvie & Jesus Zamora-Bonilla (eds.) (2011). Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Sage Publications.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamora-Bonilla (eds.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Sage Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  13
    Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamoro Bonilla (eds.) (2011). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. SAGE.
    In this excting Handbook, Jarvie and Bonilla provide a broad and democratic coverage of the many currents in social science.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  21
    Johanna Thoma (2014). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences by Ian Jarvie & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Eds. [REVIEW] Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (2):311-315.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  15
    Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla & Leonardo Monzonís Forner (2013). El debate sobre el cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (76):77-96.
    Los científicos tratan de persuadir a sus colegas y, en última instancia, al conjunto de la sociedad, para que acepten sus tesis, descubrimientos y propuestas. Desarrollan para ello una serie de estrategias que pueden ser estudiadas como un “juego de persuasión” en el que intervienen, además de los procesos de argumentación formal e informal típicamente estudiados por la lógica y metodología de la ciencia, aspectos tradicionalmente considerados “sociológicos”. En este artículo se analiza el debate sobre la ciencia del cambio climático (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). The Surprise Exam Paradox, Rationality, and Pragmatics: A Simple Game‐Theoretic Analysis. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):285-299.
    The surprise exam paradox has attracted the attention of prominent logicians, mathematicians and philosophers for decades. Although the paradox itself has been resolved at least since Quine, some aspects of it are still being discussed. In this paper we propose, following Sober, to translate the paradox into the language of game theory to clarify these aspects. Our main conclusions are that a much simpler game?theoretic analysis of the paradox is possible, which solves most of the puzzles related to it, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  45
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2005). Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach. Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
    Scientific research is reconstructed as a language game along the lines of Robert Brandom's inferentialism. Researchers are assumed to aim at persuading their colleagues of the validity of some claims. The assertions each scientist is allowed or committed to make depend on her previous claims and on the inferential norms of her research community. A classification of the most relevant types of inferential rules governing such a game is offered, and some ways in which this inferentialist approach can be used (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  31
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2010). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. [REVIEW] Theoria 25 (1):96-99.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  36
    Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2014). Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.
    Our main aim is to discuss the topic of scientific controversies in the context of a recent issue that has been the centre of attention of many epistemologists though not of argumentation theorists or philosophers of science, namely the ethics of belief in face of rational disagreement. We think that the consideration of scientific examples may be of help in the epistemological debate on rational disagreement, making clear some of the deficiencies of the discussion as it has been produced until (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  32
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2000). El naturalismo científico de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 24 (1):169.
    Se discute el proyecto de la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia, a través de las teorías de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Ambas tienen en común la atención preferente que prestan a los procesos de decisión de los científicos individuales y la defensa de una concepción realista y racionalista de la ciencia. La comparación se lleva a cabo desde una triple perspectiva: su consideración como teorías darwinianas del desarrollo científico, su referencia a los modelos de la psicología cogni (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  46
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2007). Optimal Judgment Aggregation. Philosophy of Science 74 (5):813-824.
    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any rational member of the group change her individual opinion, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  8
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (1998). Úteros en alquiler. Isegoría: Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 18:205-212.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  38
    Xavier Donato Rodríguedez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2009). Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach. Erkenntnis 70 (1).
    In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as “inferential prostheses” (instruments for surrogative reasoning) construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure (also analysed in inferential terms). The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  13
    Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (forthcoming). Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement. Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  21
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla, The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions From Interested Agents.
    Of the six sections composing «The Methodology of Posive Economics», the first one («The Relation between Positive and Normative Economics») is apparently the less discussed in the F53 literature, probably as a result of being the shortest one and the less relevant for the realism issue, all at once. In view of Milton Friedman’s subsequent career as a political preacher, it seems difficult not to wonder whether this first section ruled it the way the other five directed Friedman’s scientific performance. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  27
    Julian Reiss, David Teira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?: Guest Editors' Introduction. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):311-313.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  8
    P. Baert, D. Weinberg, V. Mottier, I. C. Jarvie & J. Zamora-Bonilla, Social Constructionism, Postmodernism and Deconstructionism.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  10
    Miranda Del Corral & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2008). Introduction:Also Sprach der Homo Oeconomicus. Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):241-244.
  21.  10
    David Teira Serrano & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2007). Editors' Introduction: Science, Normativity and the Public. Social Epistemology 21 (1):1 – 4.
  22. Miguel Álvarez Peralta & Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2010). La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual. Endoxa 24:377-407.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2004). Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science. Erkenntnis 59 (1):47-76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to reality is not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I argue that this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical point of view. My proposal is to employ Sellars-Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Jesús Zamora Bonilla (1993). ¿ Metodonomía de la ciencia? Una aplicación de la idea de verosimilitud. Endoxa 2:153-169.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2013). Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View of Scientific Research. Etica E Politica 15 (2):14-24.
    Using the approach known as ‘Economics of Scientific Knowledge’, this paperdefends the view of scientific norms as the result of a ‘social contract’, i.e., as anequilibrium in the game of selecting the norms under which toproceed to play the game of scientific research and publication. Acategorisation of the relevant types of scientific norms is offered, as well as adiscussion about the incentives of the researchers in choosing some or otheralternative rules.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2005). Truthlikeness with a Human Face: On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83:361-369.
    Verisimilitude theorists assume that science attempts to provide hypotheses with an increasing degree of closeness to the full truth; on the other hand, radical sociologists of science assert that flesh and bone scientists struggle to attain much more mundane goals . This paper argues that both points of view can be made compatible, for rational individuals only would be interested in engaging in a strong competition if they knew in advance the rules under which their outcomes are to be assessed, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Xavier De Donato Rodriguez & Jesus Zamora Bonilla (2009). Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach. Erkenntnis 70 (1):101-118.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Michael Friedman, Robert DiSalle, J. D. Trout, Shaun Nichols, Maralee Harrell, Clark Glymour, Carl G. Wagner, Kent W. Staley, Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla & Frederick M. Kronz (2002). 10. Interpreting Quantum Field Theory Interpreting Quantum Field Theory (Pp. 348-378). Philosophy of Science 69 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  29.  30
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (forthcoming). Realism Versus Anti-Realism: Philosophical Problem or Scientific Concern? Synthese:1-17.
    The decision whether to have a realist or an anti-realist attitude towards scientific hypotheses is interpreted in this paper as a choice that scientists themselves have to face in their work as scientists, rather than as a ‘philosophical’ problem. Scientists’ choices between realism and instrumentalism are interpreted in this paper with the help of two different conceptual tools: a deflationary semantics grounded in the inferentialist approach to linguistic practices developed by some authors, and an epistemic utility function that tries to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  39
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2003). Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science. Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to realityis not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I arguethat this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical pointof view. My proposal is to employ Sellars–Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their meaning through `basic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  12
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2003). Presentation: Darwinism and Social Science: Is There Any Hope for the Reductionist? Theoria 18 (3):255-257.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla (2000). El naturalismo científico de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher: Un ensayo de comparación crítica. Revista de filosofía (Chile) 24:169-190.
    Se discute el proyecto de la "naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia", a través de las teorías de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Ambas tienen en común la atención preferente que prestan a los procesos de decisión de los científicos individuales y la defensa de una concepción realista y racionalista de la ciencia. La comparación se lleva a cabo desde una triple perspectiva: su consideración como teorías darwinianas del desarrollo científico, su referencia a los modelos de la psicología cognitiva, (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  9
    Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla (2002). 18 Economists: Truth-Seekers or Rent-Seekers? In Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 356.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  11
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (1993). Un Modele Simple de Aproximación a la Verdad. Theoria 8 (1):135-148.
    The process of scientific investigation is reconstructed as a process of empirical approximation to the truth. This last concept is explicated as a combination of “degree of simmilarity between theory A and the strongest accepted empirical law at moment t” and the “degree of depth of this empirical law”. A number of methodological theorems are proved, and avision of science closer to sophisticated falsificationism is mathematically deduced from our definitions.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (1999). Representaciones En la Ciencia: De la Invariancia Estructural a la Significatividad Pragmática. Theoria 14 (2):380-382.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla (2008). Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (61):77-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  6
    Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla (2001). Where is Economic Methodology Going? Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
  38. Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (2011). La Caverna de Platón y Los Cuarenta Ladrones: Divertimentos Sobre Filosofía, Religión, Ciencia y Racionalidad. Pourquoi-Pas Editores.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Edward Erwin, Meir Hemmo, Orly Shenker, Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla, Jeremy Simon & Kim Sterelny (2006). 1. David J. Buller: Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, David J. Buller: Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, (Pp. 232-246). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 73 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla (2001). Where is Economic Methodology Going? Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  6
    John A. Hall & Ian C. Jarvie (eds.) (1996). The Social Philosophy of Ernest Gellner. Brill | Rodopi.
    Contents: John A. HALL and Ian JARVIE: Preface. John A. HALL and Ian JARVIE: The Life and Times of Ernest Gellner. PART 1 INTELLECTUAL BACKGROUND. Ji_i MUSIL: The Prague Roots of Ernest Gellner's Thinking. Chris HANN: Gellner on Malinowski: Words and Things in Central Europe. Tamara DRAGADZE: Ernest Gellner in the Soviet East. PART 2 NATIONS AND NATIONALISM. Brendan O'LEARY: On the Nature of Nationalism: An Appraisal of Ernest Gellner's Writings on Nationalism. Kenneth MINOGUE: Ernest Gellner and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  59
    Brian Epstein (2012). The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, Edited by Jarvie and Zamora-Bonilla. SAGE Publications, 2011, Xvii + 749 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):428-435.
    Book Reviews Brian Epstein, Economics and Philosophy, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  11
    Theo A. F. Kuipers (2005). On Bridging Philosophy and Sociology of Science: Reply to Jesús Zamora Bonilla. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):370-372.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  8
    Johanna Thoma (2014). Jarvie & Zamora-Bonilla, Eds. 2011. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences. Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 29 (2):311.
  45. I. Jarvie & J. Zamorra-Bonilla (eds.) (forthcoming). Chapter 14 of The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Sage Publications.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  30
    Ian Jarvie (2015). Pornography Stumps Analytic Philosophers of Art. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (1):122-140.
    A book in which analytic philosophers examine the portrayal of sex in art and the possible artistic value of pornography proves a disappointment. Although a transcendental objection to pornographic art is rebutted, the papers employ barren philosophical methods that divert energy away from significant problems and into scholastic quibbles.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Ian C. Jarvie & Joseph Agassi (1987). The Problem of the Rationality of Magic. In Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Rationality: The Critical View. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 363--383.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  11
    Ian Jarvie (2015). Book Review: Learn to Write Badly. How to Succeed in the Social Sciences by Michael Billig. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 45 (3):385-391.
  49.  2
    Ian Jarvie (forthcoming). Philosophy of Social Science From an Analytic Perspective. Metascience:1-3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  15
    Ian Jarvie (2009). Popper's Continuing Relevance. In Zuzana Parusniková & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper. Springer. pp. 217--235.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000