17 found
Order:
See also
Profile: Ilhan Inan (Bogazici University)
  1.  88
    Unanswerable Questions for Millians.Ilhan Inan - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):279-283.
    I argue that Millianism has the very odd consequence that there are simple direct questions that Millians can grasp, but they cannot answer them in the positive or the negative, or in some other way, nor could they say that they do not know the answer.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  2
    Afterthoughts on Critiques to The Philosophy of Curiosity.Ilhan Inan - 2016 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):419-439.
    In this paper I respond to and elaborate on some of the ideas put forth on my book The Philosophy of Curiosity as well as its follow-up “Curiosity and Ignorance” by Nenad Miščević, Erhan Demircioğlu, Mirela Fuš, Safi ye Yiğit, Danilo Šuster, Irem Günhan Altıparmak, and Aran Arslan.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    Curiosity and Ignorance.Ilhan Inan - 2016 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):285-303.
    Though ignorance is rarely a bliss, awareness of ignorance almost always is. Had we not been able to develop this powerful skill, there would have been no philosophy or science, nor advanced forms of religion, art, and technology. Awareness of ignorance, however, is not a motivator; but when it arouses curiosity that is strong enough, it causes what may be called an “epistemic” desire; a desire to know, to understand, to learn or to gain new experiences, which is a basic (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. How Often Do We Use a Definite Description to Talk About its Semantic Referent?Ilhan Inan - 2009 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 22 (1):7-12.
    In this paper I respond to the objections put forth by Kresimir Agbaba 22: 1-6) against my earlier paper 20: 7-13) in which I argue that given Donnellan's formulation|as well as Kripke's and Salmon's gen- eralized accounts|an attributive use of a denite description is a very rare linguistic phenomenon.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  87
    Rigid General Terms and Essential Predicates.Ilhan Inan - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):213 - 228.
    What does it mean for a general term to be rigid? It is argued by some that if we take general terms to designate their extensions, then almost no empirical general term will turn out to be rigid; and if we take them to designate some abstract entity, such as a kind, then it turns out that almost all general terms will be rigid. Various authors who pursue this line of reasoning have attempted to capture Kripke’s intent by defining a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  45
    Are “Attributive” Uses of Definite Descriptions Really Attributive?Ilhan Inan - 2006 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):7-13.
    In this essay I argue that given Donnellan’s formulation of the attributive uses of definite descriptions, as well as Kripke’s [6] and Salmon’s [10] generalized accounts, most uses of definite descriptions that are taken to be attributive turn out not to be so. In building up to my main thesis, I first consider certain problematic cases of uses of definite descriptions that do not neatly fit into any category. I then argue that, in general, a complete definite description we use (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  40
    Inostensible Reference and Conceptual Curiosity.Ilhan Inan - 2010 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):21-41.
    A lot has been said about how the notion of reference relates to the notion of knowledge; not much has been said, however, on how the notion of referencerelates to our ability to become aware of what we do not know that allows us to be curious. In this essay I attempt to spell out a certain type of reference I call ‘inostensible’ that I claim to be a fundamental linguistic tool which allows us to become curious of what we (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  17
    Discovery and Inostensible De Re Knowledge.Ilhan Inan - 2005 - In G. Irzık & R. S. Cohen (eds.), Turkish Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    Rigid Designation and Theoretical Identities.Ilhan Inan - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):217-220.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  16
    ‘The Referential’ and ‘the Attributive’: Two Distinctions for the Price of One.Ilhan Inan - 2006 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 12 (2):137-160.
    There are two sorts of singular terms for which we have difficulty applying Donnellan’s referential/attributive distinction: complex definite descriptions, and proper names. With respect to the uses of such terms in certain contexts we seem to have conflicting intuitions as to whether they should be classified as referential or attributive. The problem concerning how to apply Donnellan’s distinction to the uses of certain complex definite descriptions has never been debated in the literature. On the other hand there have been attempts (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  8
    A Defense of the Indiscernibility of Identicals.Ilhan Inan - 2004 - Revue Roumaine de Philosophie 48:61-72.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  6
    How to Predict Future Contingencies.Ilhan Inan - 2005 - Yeditepe’de Felsefe 4:152-158.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Humor at the Limits of Thought.Ilhan Inan - 2008 - Septet 1.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  80
    The Philosophy of Curiosity.Ilhan Inan - 2011 - Routledge.
    In this book, Ilhan Inan questions the classical definition of curiosity as _a desire to know._ Working in an area where epistemology and philosophy of language overlap, Inan forges a link between our ability to become aware of our ignorance and our linguistic aptitude to construct terms referring to things unknown. The book introduces the notion of inostensible reference. Ilhan connects this notion to related concepts in philosophy of language: knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description; the referential and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Berent Enç.Gürol Irzık & İlhan İnan - 2003 - Felsefe Tartismalari 30:5-6.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Aynıların Ayırdedilmezliği.İlhan İnan - 2000 - Felsefe Tartismalari 26:15-20.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Küreselleşme Özgürlük Getiriyor mu?İlhan İnan - 2001 - Felsefe Tartismalari 28:115-119.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography