Order:
  1. Burdens of Proof and the Case for Unevenness.Imran Aijaz, Jonathan McKeown-Green & Aness Webster - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (3):259-282.
    How is the burden of proof to be distributed among individuals who are involved in resolving a particular issue? Under what conditions should the burden of proof be distributed unevenly? We distinguish attitudinal from dialectical burdens and argue that these questions should be answered differently, depending on which is in play. One has an attitudinal burden with respect to some proposition when one is required to possess sufficient evidence for it. One has a dialectical burden with respect to some proposition (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  75
    Divine Hiddenness and Discrimination: A Philosophical Dilemma.Markus Weidler & Imran Aijaz - 2013 - Sophia 52 (1):95-114.
    Since its first delivery in 1993, J.L. Schellenberg’s atheistic argument from divine hiddenness keeps generating lively debate in various quarters in the philosophy of religion. Over time, the author has responded to many criticisms of his argument, both in its original evidentialist version and in its subsequent conceptualist version. One central problem that has gone undetected in these exchanges to date, we argue, is how Schellenberg’s explicit-recognition criterion for revelation contains discriminatory tendencies against mentally handicapped persons. Viewed from this angle, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3. Some Critical Reflections on the Hiddenness Argument.Imran Aijaz & Markus Weidler - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):1 - 23.
    J.L. Schellenberg’s Argument from Divine Hiddenness maintains that if a perfectly loving God exists, then there is no non-resistant non-belief. Given that such nonbelief exists, however, it follows that there is no perfectly loving God. To support the conditional claim, Schellenberg presents conceptual and analogical considerations, which we subject to critical scrutiny. We also evaluate Schellenberg’s claim that the belief that God exists is logically necessary for entering into a relationship with the Divine. Finally, we turn to possible variants of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  4.  60
    'How to Answer the "de Jure" Question About Christian Belief.John Bishop & Imran Aijaz - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (2/3):109 - 129.
  5.  6
    Traditional Islamic Exclusivism - A Critique.Imran Aijaz - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):185--209.
    In this paper, I give an account and critique of what I call ”Traditional Islamic Exclusivism’ -- a specific Islamic interpretation of religious exclusivism. This Islamic version of religious exclusivism rests on exclusivist attitudes towards truth, epistemic justification and salvation. After giving an account of Traditional Islamic Exclusivism by explaining its theological roots in the Qur’an and ahadith, I proceed to critique it. I do so by arguing that Islamic epistemic exclusivism, which forms the main core of Traditional Islamic Exclusivism, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  83
    Belief, Providence and Eschatology: Some Philosophical Problems in Islamic Theism.Imran Aijaz - 2007 - Philosophy Compass 3 (1):231-253.
  7.  20
    Some Ruminations About Inculpable Non-Belief.Imran Aijaz - 2013 - Religious Studies 49 (3):399-419.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    ?How to Answer the de Jure Question About Christian Belief?John Bishop & Imran Aijaz - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (2-3):109-129.