Order:
See also
Jose Juan Moreso
Universitat Pompeu Fabra
  1.  11
    Handbook of Legal Reasoning and Argumentation.Colin Aitken, Amalia Amaya, Kevin D. Ashley, Carla Bagnoli, Giorgio Bongiovanni, Bartosz Brożek, Cristiano Castelfranchi, Samuele Chilovi, Marcello Di Bello, Jaap Hage, Kenneth Einar Himma, Lewis A. Kornhauser, Emiliano Lorini, Fabrizio Macagno, Andrei Marmor, J. J. Moreso, Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco, Antonino Rotolo, Giovanni Sartor, Burkhard Schafer, Chiara Valentini, Bart Verheij, Douglas Walton & Wojciech Załuski (eds.) - 2018 - Springer Verlag.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2. Algunas observaciones sobre las nociones de orden jurídico y sistema jurídico.J. J. Moreso & Navarro Pablo E. - 1992 - Análisis Filosófico 12 (2):125.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  11
    Consistencia Mediante Jerarquía.J. J. Moreso - 2013 - Análisis Filosófico 33 (1):94-102.
    En esta contribución intentaré mostrar que el criterio lex superior derogat legi inferiori conduce a una consecuencia que, al menos en lo que conozco, no ha sido todavía advertida. Si las normas de la máxima jerarquía de un sistema jurídico, verbigracia, normas constitucionales constituyen un conjunto consistente, entonces necesariamente el sistema jurídico es consistente. Dicho de otra manera, lex superior preserva necesariamente la consistencia. Si las normas del nivel más alto son miembros de un conjunto consistente, los niveles inferiores de (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. El reino de los derechos y la objetividad de la moral.J. J. Moreso - 2003 - Análisis Filosófico 23 (2):117-150.
    This paper intends to show that it is possible to take convincingly into account the platitudes which underlie our moral practice. It deals with the articulation of an indirect strategy to answer the arguments of moral scepticism: if we can generate a conceptual space that takes such platitudes into account, perhaps we could ignore the sceptic doubts.Several metaethical conceptions can ecumenically carry out this task. Particularly, even if moral realism implies cognitivism and objectivism, moral objectivism –the plausibility of rational agreement (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  10
    Nino y Dworkin Sobre Los Conceptos de Derecho.J. J. Moreso - 2015 - Análisis Filosófico 35 (1):111-131.
    Algunos de los más relevantes filósofos del derecho de los últimos años, como Carlos S. Nino y Ronald Dworkin, han defendido que hay una pluralidad de conceptos de Derecho. Scott Shapiro ha sostenido una posición especialmente relevante acerca de ello: la palabra ‘Derecho’ es sistemáticamente ambigua, pues a veces designa un conjunto de normas y otras veces una organización social. Esta es precisamente la tesis criticada en el trabajo. Se argumenta, basándose en determinada literatura filosófica acerca de los conceptos, que (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. On Deontic Truth and Values.J. J. Moreso - 2017 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (146):61-74.
    This article analyzes the thesis of ethical relativism, as defended by Alchourrón and Bulygin. These authors offer, on the one hand, a suggestive conception according to which the question “what are our obligations?” is equivalent to thinking about what is to be done; on the other hand, they defend a relativist conception of ethics. They present three objections to constructivist accounts of ethics that are not relativist: a) the argument of the burden of the proof; b) a version of the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  26
    On Relevance and Justification of Legal Decisions.J. J. Moreso - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (1):73 - 100.
    The author discusses a question related to a certain aspect of justification of legal decisions, often so-called internal justification-a legal decision is internally justified if and only if it can be deduced from the norm(s) applicable to the case, and from the statement(s) describing the facts of the case. According to this notion, infinite irrelevant logical consequences are justified. To avoid this counterintuitive conclusion, the author analyzes three notions of relevance: Sperber-Wilson's notion, Anderson-Belnap's notion, and Schurz's notion. The author presents (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  7
    The Aristorcracy of All: Gargarella or the Constitutionalism of Equality.J. J. Moreso - 2017 - Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía Política 6 (1).
    In this comment to the brilliant book on the Constitutionalism in Latin-America, Gargarella, it is accepted that perhaps is the equality the empty promise among the ideals of constitutionalism in this region of the world. It is also accepted that an important part of the reason for this absence of equality lies in the institutional design, in the engine room of the Constitution, concretely in an hypertrophy of presidentialism. A complementary suggestion is added: the ideal of a constitutional democracy presupposes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  15
    The Untouchables of Law.J. J. Moreso - 2016 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 19 (4):496-503.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark