12 found
Order:
  1.  22
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Part IV.J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):583 - 596.
  2. George Berkeley, 1685-1753.J. P. De C. Day - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (2):265-286.
    In disproof of the materialist principle, that common things exist unperceived, and in defence of the New Principle, Philonous here objects that it is inconceivable that a common thing should do so. Hylas replies that, on the contrary, we can and do think of, e.g., a tree standing alone as opposed to a tree being perceived by an observer. But Philonous counter-objects to this reply that it contains a contradiction, since it asserts that we can think of something which is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. George Berkeley 1685-1753.J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):447-470.
    According to Berkeley, then, the unconscious process of inference of the scientist goes as follows. He notices that, when he does not have his house within visual range, he cannot see it just by wishing to; and that, when he does have it within visual range and his eyes open, he cannot prevent himself from seeing it just by wishing not to. He therefore infers that he is not the efficient cause of these sensations. But, since he holds that they (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  1
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753.J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):583-596.
    Both these developments would have surprised Berkeley. He would have found it paradoxical that the vulgar should have rejected his vulgar immaterialism as paradoxical, since he of course believed himself to be on their side in the matter, and characterised his own philosophy as a.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  15
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753: II.J. P. De C. Day - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (2):265 - 286.
  6.  22
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Part I.J. P. De C. Day - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):83 - 113.
  7.  12
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Part 2.J. P. De C. Day - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (2):265-286.
  8.  8
    George Berkeley, 1685-1753: Part 4.J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (4):583-596.
  9.  32
    George Berkeley 1685-1753: Part 3.J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (3):447-469.
  10. George Berkeley, 1685-1753.The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of CloyneThe Life of George Berkeley. [REVIEW]J. P. De C. Day - 1952 - Review of Metaphysics 6 (1):83-114.
    Hitherto, the standard edition of Berkeley's works has been A. C. Fraser's of 1901, published by the Oxford University Press. The chief differences between the two editions are these. Professors Luce and Jessop give of each text the latest edition published by Berkeley himself, adding all significant variations in any earlier editions in footnotes, whereas Fraser followed no uniform procedure, and sometimes combined different editions. This difference is obviously an improvement. Further, Professor Luce's edition of Berkeley's pair of notebooks, which (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. WALKER, P. G. - Restatement of Liberty. [REVIEW]J. P. De C. Day - 1953 - Mind 62:386.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  4
    Critical Notices.J. P. De C. Day - 1968 - Mind 77 (308):593-601.
    Burgess, J.P. and Rosen, G. Subject with No ObjectElliott, R.Faking Nature.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark