6 found
Order:
See also
J. Spencer Atkins
State University of New York at Binghamton
  1.  58
    Have You Benefitted From Carbon Emissions? You May Be a “Morally Objectionable Free Rider”.J. Spencer Atkins - 2018 - Environmental Ethics 40 (3):283-296.
    Much of the climate ethics discussion centers on considerations of compensatory justice and historical accountability. However, little attention is given to supporting and defending the Beneficiary Pays Principle as a guide for policymaking. This principle states that those who have benefitted from an instance of harm have an obligation to compensate those who have been harmed. Thus, this principle implies that those benefitted by industrialization and carbon emission owe compensation to those who have been harmed by climate change. Beneficiary Pays (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  2.  4
    Eileen Crist: Abundant Earth: Toward an Ecological Civilization. [REVIEW]J. Spencer Atkins - 2019 - Environmental Ethics 41 (2):189-192.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  7
    Going Up?: Karen Bennett: Making Things Up. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, 260 Pp, $60.00HB. [REVIEW]J. Spencer Atkins - 2019 - Metascience 28 (3):515-517.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  12
    Marcus Düwell, Gerhard Bos and Naomi Van Steenbergen , Towards the Ethics of a Green Future: The Theory and Practice of Human Rights for Future People. [REVIEW]J. Spencer Atkins - 2019 - Environmental Values 28 (4):510-512.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  91
    Moral Encroachment, Wokeness, and the Epistemology of Holding.J. Spencer Atkins - forthcoming - Episteme:1-15.
    Hilde Lindemann argues that personhood is the shared practice of recognizing and responding to one another. She calls this practice holding. Holding, however, can fail. Holding failure, by stereotyping for example, can inhibit others’ epistemic confidence and ability to recall true beliefs as well as create an environment of racism or sexism. How might we avoid holding failure? Holding failure, I argue, has many epistemic dimensions, so I argue that moral encroachment has the theoretical tools available to avoid holding failures. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  8
    Pricing Carbon and the Beneficiary Pays Principle: Framing Market-Based Incentives Around Compensation Obligations.J. Spencer Atkins - 2019 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 22 (2):148-150.
    Volume 22, Issue 2, June 2019, Page 148-150.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark