11 found
Order:
  1. The Booming Economics-Made-Fun Genre: More Than Having Fun, but Less Than Economics Imperialism.Jack J. Vromen - 2009 - Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics 2 (1):70-99.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Collective Intentionality, Evolutionary Biology and Social Reality.Jack J. Vromen - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (3):251-265.
    The paper aims to clarify and scrutinize Searle"s somewhat puzzling statement that collective intentionality is a biologically primitive phenomenon. It is argued that the statement is not only meant to bring out that "collective intentionality" is not further analyzable in terms of individual intentionality. It also is meant to convey that we have a biologically evolved innate capacity for collective intentionality.The paper points out that Searle"s dedication to a strong notion of collective intentionality considerably delimits the scope of his endeavor. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  63
    Why the Economic Conception of Human Behaviour Might Lack a Biological Basis.Jack J. Vromen - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):297-323.
    In several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. Thesescenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    Economics and Philosophy: The Evolutionary Foundations of Economics, Kurt Dopfer. Cambridge University Press, 2005, 577 +Xiii Pages. [REVIEW]Jack J. Vromen - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (1):131.
  5.  11
    The Methodology of Macroeconomic Thought: A Conceptual Analysis of Schools in Economics, Sheila C. Dow. Edward Elgar, 1996, Xiv + 255 Pages. [REVIEW]Jack J. Vromen - 1998 - Economics and Philosophy 14 (1):157.
  6.  4
    Introduction:'Neuroeconomics: Hype or Hope?'.Jack J. Vromen & Caterina Marchionni - 2010 - Journal of Economic Methodology 17 (2).
  7.  1
    Why the Economic Conception of Human Behaviour Might Lack a Biological Basis.Jack J. Vromen - 2003 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 18 (3):297-323.
    In several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. Thesescenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    No Title Available: Reviews.Jack J. Vromen - 1998 - Economics and Philosophy 14 (1):157-163.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Maatschappelijke werkelijkheid en economische wetenschap. Filosofische analyses van een verstoorde relatie.Frans J. M. van Doorne & Jack J. Vromen - 1992 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 54 (2):345-346.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Collective Intentionality, Social Reality, and Evolutionary Biology.Jack J. Vromen - 2003 - Philosophical Explorations 6 (3):251-64.
  11. Why the Economic Conception of Human Behaviour Might Lack a Biological Basis.Jack J. Vromen - 2003 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 18 (3):297-323.
    In several recent papers Arthur Robson sketches evolutionary scenarios in order to explain why we humans evolved hard-wired utility functions and the capacity to choose flexibly on the basis of them. These scenarios are scrutinized minutely in the paper. It is pointed out that Robson ignores several relevant insightful ideas and distinctions that have surfaced in other contemporary evolutionary theorizing. A somewhat different picture of human behavior emerges once these ideas and distinctions are taken seriously.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography