13 found
Order:
See also
  1.  45
    The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine.Craig M. Klugman, Laura B. Dunn, Jack Schwartz & I. Glenn Cohen - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (9):38-47.
    Digital medicine is a medical treatment that combines technology with drug delivery. The promises of this combination are continuous and remote monitoring, better disease management, self-tracking, self-management of diseases, and improved treatment adherence. These devices pose ethical challenges for patients, providers, and the social practice of medicine. For patients, having both informed consent and a user agreement raises questions of understanding for autonomy and informed consent, therapeutic misconception, external influences on decision making, confidentiality and privacy, and device dependability. For providers, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  2.  12
    Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Jack Schwartz & Adil E. Shamoo - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):3-5.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  3.  9
    Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Adil E. Shamoo & Jack Schwartz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):7 – 9.
  4.  22
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “The Ethics of Smart Pills and Self-Acting Devices: Autonomy, Truth-Telling, and Trust at the Dawn of Digital Medicine”.Craig M. Klugman, Laura B. Dunn, Jack Schwartz & I. Glenn Cohen - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (10):4-7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  5
    Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research.Adil E. Shamoo & Jack Schwartz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (12):7-9.
  6. Oversight of Human Subject Research: The Role of the States.Jack Schwartz - forthcoming - National Bioethics Advisory Commission 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 700, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7979 Telephone: 301-402-4242• Fax: 301-480-6900• Website: Www. Bioethics. Gov.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  16
    Esprit de Corps.Evan G. DeRenzo & Jack Schwartz - 2011 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 22 (1):95.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  13
    ""Building Esprit de Corps: Learning to Better Navigate Between" My" Patient and" Our" Patient.Evan G. DeRenzo & Jack Schwartz - 2010 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 21 (3):232.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  21
    Maryland's Ethics Committee Legislation — a Leading Edge Model or a Step Into the Abyss?Evan DeRenzo, Henry Silverman, Diane Hoffmann, Jack Schwartz & Janicemarie Vinicky - 2001 - HEC Forum 13 (1):49-58.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  18
    Writing the Rules of Death: State Regulation of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Jack Schwartz - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):207-216.
    If the Supreme Court affirms either Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington or Quill v. Vacco, state legislatures will be presented with a new and unwelcome task: regulating physician-assisted suicide. This article focuses on the states task of specific policy making in light of the due process reasoning in Compassion in Dying and the equal protection reasoning in Quill. Policy makers must try to predict whether a particular regulation would in practice achieve its intended objective. They must also try (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  6
    A Response to Commentators on “Universal and Uniform Protections of Human Subjects in Research”.Adil Shamoo & Jack Schwartz - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):1-1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  5
    Writing the Rules of Death: State Regulation of Physician-Assisted Suicide.Jack Schwartz - 1996 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 24 (3):207-216.
    If the Supreme Court affirms either Compassion in Dying v. State of Washington or Quill v. Vacco, state legislatures will be presented with a new and unwelcome task: regulating physician-assisted suicide. This article focuses on the states task of specific policy making in light of the due process reasoning in Compassion in Dying and the equal protection reasoning in Quill. Policy makers must try to predict whether a particular regulation would in practice achieve its intended objective. They must also try (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  7
    State Regulation of Managed Care: Fragments of Reform.Jack Schwartz - 1997 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 7 (4):345-351.
    : State legislatures consider numerous bills to regulate managed care organizations. After identifying the legal, political, and economic barriers to state reform efforts, the paper assesses recent types of state regulation, particularly mandated benefits and disclosure requirements. Two prerequisites to future reform, coalition building and the diffusion of information about managed care, are analyzed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark