Order:
Disambiguations
James Hardy [6]James Hardy Jr [1]James D. Hardy [1]James Hintze Hardy [1]
  1.  2
    Non-Conscious Visual Cues Related to Affect and Action Alter Perception of Effort and Endurance Performance.Anthony Blanchfield, James Hardy & Samuele Marcora - 2014 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.
  2.  38
    Is Yablo's Paradox Liar-Like?James Hardy - 1955 - Analysis 55 (3):197 - 198.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3.  26
    Burdens of Proof.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
    Proponents of modal versions of the ontological argument have traditionally defended the prernise that God possibly exists by arguing that such a premise is more plausible than its negation. In this paper I argue that such a defense is insufficient to justify acceptance of the premise within the scope of a modal proof, and that this insufficiency accounts for the lack of probative force of these versions of the ontological argument. Rather, I claim that what is needed is a defense (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  33
    Three Problems for the Singularity Theory of Truth.James Hardy - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (5):501-520.
    In this paper I present three problems for Simmons' singularity theory of truth as he presents it in Universality and the Liar. I begin with a brief overview of the theory and then present the three problems I see for it. The first problem shows that the singularity theory is in conflict with our ordinary notion of truth. I present a set of sentences that the singularity theory evaluates differently than does our pretheoretic concept of truth. The second problem shows (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Burdens of Proof: Why Modal Ontological Arguments Aren’T Convincing.James Hardy - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Research 21:321-330.
    Proponents of modal versions of the ontological argument have traditionally defended the prernise that God possibly exists by arguing that such a premise is more plausible than its negation. In this paper I argue that such a defense is insufficient to justify acceptance of the premise within the scope of a modal proof, and that this insufficiency accounts for the lack of probative force of these versions of the ontological argument. Rather, I claim that what is needed is a defense (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Milton and the Hermeneutic Journey.Gale H. Carrithers & James D. Hardy - 1994
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. How to Catch Achilles:* An Introduction to the Theory of Infinitals.James Hardy - 2004 - Logique Et Analyse 185 (47):425-444.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Magical Realism in the Tales of Nikolai Gogol.James Hardy Jr & Leonard Stanton - 2002 - Janus Head 5 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography