See also:
Profile: James Morauta
  1. James Morauta (2004). Three Separation Theses. Law and Philosophy 23 (2):111-135.
    Legal positivism's ``separation thesis'' is usually taken in one of two ways: as an analytic claim about the nature of law – roughly, as some version of the Social Thesis; or as a substantive claim about the moral value of law – roughly, as some version of the Value Thesis. In this paper I argue that we should recognize a third kind of positivist separation thesis, one which complements, but is distinct from, positivism's analytic and moral claims. The Neutrality Thesis (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. James Morauta (2010). In Defence of State-Based Reasons to Intend. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):208-228.
    A state-based reason for one to intend to perform an action F is a reason for one to intend to F which is not a reason for one to F. Are there any state-based reasons to intend? According to the Explanatory Argument, the answer is no, because state-based reasons do not satisfy a certain explanatory constraint. I argue that whether or not the constraint is correct, the Explanatory Argument is unsound, because state-based reasons do satisfy the constraint. The considerations that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  7
    James Morauta (2004). Andrei Marmor/the Rule of Law and its Limits 1–43 Joachim Hruschka/the Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant's Metaphysics of Morals 45–72. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 23:639-640.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography