62 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
James van Cleve [62]James Lewis Van Cleve [1]
  1. James van Cleve (2008). The Moon and Sixpence : A Defense of Mereological Universalism. In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  2.  52
    Van Cleve James (2002). Thomas Reid's Geometry of Visibles. Philosophical Review 111 (3):373-416.
  3.  44
    Van Cleve James (1992). Semantic Supervenience and Referential Indeterminacy. Journal of Philosophy 89 (7):344-361.
  4. Van Cleve James (1979). Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles, and the Cartesian Circle. Philosophical Review 88 (1):55-91.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  5.  72
    James van Cleve (2011). Can Coherence Generate Warrant Ex Nihilo? Probability and the Logic of Concurring Witnesses. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):337-380.
    Most foundationalists allow that relations of coherence among antecedently justified beliefs can enhance their overall level of justification or warrant. In light of this, some coherentists ask the following question: if coherence can elevate the epistemic status of a set of beliefs, what prevents it from generating warrant entirely on its own? Why do we need the foundationalist’s basic beliefs? I address that question here, drawing lessons from an instructive series of attempts to reconstruct within the probability calculus the classical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6. James Van Cleve (2003). Is Knowledge Easy -- Or Impossible? Externalism as the Only Alternative to Skepticism. In Stephen Luper (ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Ashgate.
  7.  34
    James van Cleve (2008). Reid on Single and Double Vision: Mechanics and Morals. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):1-20.
    When we look at a tree, two images of it are formed, one on each of our retinas. Why, then, asks the child or the philosopher, do we not see two trees?1 Thomas Reid offers an answer to this question in the section of his Inquiry into the Human Mind entitled ‘Of seeing objects single with two eyes’. The principles he invokes in his answer serve at the same time to explain why we do occasionally see objects double. In Part (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8. James van Cleve (1990). Mind-Dust or Magic? Panpsychism Versus Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9.  40
    James Van Cleve (2012). Defining and Defending Nonconceptual Contents and States. Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):411-430.
  10. van Cleve James (1994). Predication Without Universals? A Fling with Ostrich Nominalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3):577-590.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11. James van Cleve (1983). Conceivability and the Cartesian Argument for Dualism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (January):35-45.
  12.  32
    James Van Cleve (2004). 4 Reid's Theory of Perception. In Terence Cuneo Rene van Woudenberg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. James Van Cleve (2006). I. The Principles of Veracity and Credulity. In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  14.  36
    Van Cleve James (1996). If Meinong Is Wrong, Is McTaggart Right? Philosophical Topics 24 (1):231-254.
  15.  74
    van Cleve James (1987). Right, Left, and the Fourth Dimension. Philosophical Review 96 (1):33-68.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  16.  19
    James Van Cleve (2005). Why Coherence is Not Enough: A Defense of Moderate Foundationalism. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  33
    James Van Cleve (2016). Objectivity Without Objects: A Priorian Program. Synthese 193 (11):3535-3549.
    The issues I explore in this paper are best introduced by the table with which it begins. The left-hand entry in each row gives expression to a kind objectivity; the right-hand entry affirms the existence of a special kind of object. When philosophers believe in any of the entities on the right, it is typically because they think them necessary to ground the facts on the left. By the same token, when philosophers deny any of the facts on the left, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  7
    James van Cleve (1990). Mind -- Dust or Magic? Panpsychism Versus Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  19.  79
    James Van Cleve (1995). Putnam, Kant and Secondary Qualities. Philosophical Papers 24 (2):83-109.
  20.  39
    James Van Cleve (1990). List of Program Participants. Journal of Philosophy 87 (10):564-568.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  28
    James Van Cleve (1990). Program of the Meetings. Journal of Philosophy 87 (10):551-563.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. van Cleve James (2011). Sosa on Easy Knowledge and the Problem of the Criterion. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):19-28.
  23. James Van Cleve & Robert E. Frederick (1994). The Philosophy of Right and Left: Incongruent Counterparts and the Nature of Space. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):459-466.
  24.  99
    Van Cleve James (2006). Touch, Sound, and Things Without the Mind. Metaphilosophy 37 (2):162-182.
    Two notable thought experiments are discussed in this article: Reid's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with tactile sensations alone could acquire the conception of extension and Strawson's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with auditory sensations alone could acquire the conception of mind-independent objects. The experiments are considered alongside Campbell's argument that only on the so-called relational view of experience is it possible for experiences to make available to their subjects the concept of mind-independent objects. I consider (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  5
    James Van Cleve (2016). Précis of Problems From Reid. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):208-211.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  79
    Van Cleve James (1981). Reflections on Kant's Second Antimony. Synthese 47 (3):481-494.
  27.  79
    James van Cleve (2011). Rates of Passage. Analytic Philosophy 52 (3):141-170.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  20
    James Van Cleve (1979). Appendixes to the Program. Journal of Philosophy 76 (10):593-599.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  46
    James van Cleve (2004). Review: Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (450):405-416.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  19
    James Van Cleve (1990). List of Group Participants. Journal of Philosophy 87 (10):580-584.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  3
    van Cleve James (1994). Predication Without Universals? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (3):577-590.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  3
    James Van Cleve (2016). Replies to Falkenstein, Copenhaver, and Winkler. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 93 (1):232-245.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  12
    van Cleve James (2003). Reid Versus Berkeley on the Inverted Retinal Image. Philosophical Topics 31 (1/2):425-455.
  34.  51
    van Cleve James (2002). Time, Idealism, And The Identity Of Indiscernibles. Noûs 36 (s16):379-393.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  15
    James Van Cleve (1983). Epistemic Superoeruence and the Circle of Belief. Journal of Philosophy 80 (9999):660-661.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  23
    James Van Cleve (2013). Necessity, Analyticity, and the A Priori. In Stewart Duncan & Antonia LoLordo (eds.), Debates in Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings and Contemporary Responses. Routledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  35
    James Van Cleve (1977). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Teaching Philosophy 2 (3/4):387-388.
  38.  53
    van Cleve James (2003). Précis of Problems From Kant. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):190–195.
  39. James Van Cleve (2011). Epistemic Humility and Causal Structuralism. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. James van Cleve (2008). Reid's Response to the Skeptic. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
  41. Van Cleve James (1996). Minimal Truth Is Realist Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):869-875.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  40
    Van Cleve James (1985). Why a Set Contains its Members Essentially. Noûs 19 (4):585-602.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    James Van Cleve (2011). Primary–Secondary Quality Distinction. In Lawrence Nolan (ed.), Primary and Secondary Qualities: The Historical and Ongoing Debate. Oxford University Press.
  44.  37
    van Cleve James (1981). C. I. Lewis' Defense of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):325-332.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  15
    James Van Cleve (1986). Comments on Paul Guyer's “The Failure of the B-Deduction”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (Supplement):85-87.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  20
    James van Cleve (1999). Epistemic Supervenience Revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1049-1055.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. James Van Cleve (1990). Emergence Vs. Panpsychism: Magic or Mind Dust? Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  24
    van Cleve James (2003). Replies. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):219–227.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  19
    James van Cleve (2008). Double Appearances Are Double Trouble: Reply to Foster. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (2):195-196.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  16
    James van Cleve (1991). Entity, Identity, and Actuality: A Critical Review. Philosophical Papers 20 (1):37-50.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 62