90 found
Order:
Disambiguations
James van Cleve [90]James Lewis Van Cleve [1]
  1.  74
    Thomas Reid and the Story of Epistemology.James van Cleve - 2004 - Mind 113 (450):405-416.
  2. Brute Necessity.James Van Cleve - 2018 - Philosophy Compass 13 (9):e12516.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  3. Problems From Kant.James van Cleve - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (209):637-640.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   42 citations  
  4.  9
    Problems From Kant.James van Cleve - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):190-195.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   40 citations  
  5. Three Versions of the Bundle Theory.James Van Cleve - 1985 - Philosophical Studies 47 (1):95 - 107.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  6. The Moon and Sixpence : A Defense of Mereological Universalism.James Van Cleve - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell.
  7. Is Knowledge Easy -- Or Impossible? Externalism as the Only Alternative to Skepticism.James Van Cleve - 2003 - In Stephen Luper (ed.), The Skeptics: Contemporary Essays. Ashgate.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  8. Mind – Dust or Magic? Panpsychism Versus Emergence.James van Cleve - 1990 - Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  9. Thomas Reid’s Geometry of Visibles.James van Cleve - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (3):373-416.
    In a brief but remarkable section of the Inquiry into the Human Mind, Thomas Reid argued that the visual field is governed by principles other than the familiar theorems of Euclid—theorems we would nowadays classify as Riemannian. On the strength of this section, he has been credited by Norman Daniels, R. B. Angell, and others with discovering non-Euclidean geometry over half a century before the mathematicians—sixty years before Lobachevsky and ninety years before Riemann. I believe that Reid does indeed have (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  10. Mereological Essentialism, Mereological Conjunctivism, and Identity Through Time.James van Cleve - 1986 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 11 (1):141-156.
  11.  11
    Problems From Reid.James Van Cleve - 2015 - Oxford University Press.
    James Van Cleve here shows why Thomas Reid (1710-96) deserves a place alongside the other canonical figures of modern philosophy. He expounds Reid's positions and arguments on a wide range of topics, taking interpretive stands on points where his meaning is disputed and assessing the value of his contributions to issues philosophers are discussing today. -/- Among the topics Van Cleve explores are Reid's account of perception and its relation to sensation, conception, and belief; his nativist account of the origin (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  12.  24
    Mind -- Dust or Magic?James van Cleve - 1990 - Panpsychism Versus Emergence. Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  13.  30
    Lewis and Taylor as Partners in Sin.James Van Cleve - 2019 - Acta Analytica 34 (2):165-175.
    David Lewis’s analysis of “can” in “The Paradoxes of Time Travel” has been widely accepted both as a definitive analysis of “can” and as a successful resolution of the Grandfather Paradox for time travel. I argue that the central feature of his analysis puts it on all fours with a fallacy frequently imputed to fatalists such as Richard Taylor. I go on to consider two moves that might be made to avoid the fallacy, arguing that one of them leads to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  61
    Semantic Supervenience and Referential Indeterminacy.James Van Cleve - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (7):344-361.
  15. Conceivability and the Cartesian Argument for Dualism.James van Cleve - 1983 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 64 (January):35-45.
  16.  94
    Can Coherence Generate Warrant Ex Nihilo? Probability and the Logic of Concurring Witnesses.James Van Cleve - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):337-380.
    Most foundationalists allow that relations of coherence among antecedently justified beliefs can enhance their overall level of justification or warrant. In light of this, some coherentists ask the following question: if coherence can elevate the epistemic status of a set of beliefs, what prevents it from generating warrant entirely on its own? Why do we need the foundationalist’s basic beliefs? I address that question here, drawing lessons from an instructive series of attempts to reconstruct within the probability calculus the classical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  17. Reid on the Credit of Human Testimony.James Van Cleve - 2006 - In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  18.  46
    4 Reid's Theory of Perception.James Van Cleve - 2004 - In Terence Cuneo Rene van Woudenberg (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge University Press.
  19.  11
    Thomas Reid’s Geometry of Visibles.James van Cleve - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (3):373-416.
    In a brief but remarkable section of the Inquiry into the Human Mind, Thomas Reid argued that the visual field is governed by principles other than the familiar theorems of Euclid—theorems we would nowadays classify as Riemannian. On the strength of this section, he has been credited by Norman Daniels, R. B. Angell, and others with discovering non-Euclidean geometry over half a century before the mathematicians—sixty years before Lobachevsky and ninety years before Riemann. I believe that Reid does indeed have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  20.  91
    Reid’s Answer to Molyneux’s Question.James Van Cleve - 2007 - The Monist 90 (2):251 - 270.
  21.  28
    Can Coherence Generate Warrant Ex Nihilo? Probability and the Logic of Concurring Witnesses.James Van Cleve - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):337 - 380.
    Most foundationalists allow that relations of coherence among antecedently justified beliefs can enhance their overall level of justification or warrant. In light of this, some coherentists ask the following question: if coherence can elevate the epistemic status of a set of beliefs, what prevents it from generating warrant entirely on its own? Why do we need the foundationalist's basic beliefs? I address that question here, drawing lessons from an instructive series of attempts to reconstruct within the probability calculus the classical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  22. Does Suppositional Reasoning Solve the Bootstrapping Problem?James Van Cleve - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (3): 351-363.
    In a 2002 article Stewart Cohen advances the “bootstrapping problem” for what he calls “basic justification theories,” and in a 2010 followup he offers a solution to the problem, exploiting the idea that suppositional reasoning may be used with defeasible as well as with deductive inference rules. To curtail the form of bootstrapping permitted by basic justification theories, Cohen insists that subjects must know their perceptual faculties are reliable before perception can give them knowledge. But how is such knowledge of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  77
    Objectivity Without Objects: A Priorian Program.James Van Cleve - 2016 - Synthese 193 (11):3535-3549.
    The issues I explore in this paper are best introduced by the table with which it begins. The left-hand entry in each row gives expression to a kind objectivity; the right-hand entry affirms the existence of a special kind of object. When philosophers believe in any of the entities on the right, it is typically because they think them necessary to ground the facts on the left. By the same token, when philosophers deny any of the facts on the left, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24. Epistemic Supervenience and the Circle of Belief.James Van Cleve - 1985 - The Monist 68 (1):90-104.
    I shall begin with a series of quotations to illustrate how widespread are the views I wish to challenge.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  25.  51
    Why Coherence is Not Enough: A Defense of Moderate Foundationalism.James Van Cleve - 2005 - In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  26. Foundationalism, Epistemic Principles and the Cartesian Circle.James Van Cleve - 1998 - In John Cottingham (ed.), Descartes. Oxford University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  27.  69
    Defining and Defending Nonconceptual Contents and States.James Van Cleve - 2012 - Philosophical Perspectives 26 (1):411-430.
  28.  72
    Reid on Single and Double Vision: Mechanics and Morals.James van Cleve - 2008 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):1-20.
    When we look at a tree, two images of it are formed, one on each of our retinas. Why, then, asks the child or the philosopher, do we not see two trees?1 Thomas Reid offers an answer to this question in the section of his Inquiry into the Human Mind entitled ‘Of seeing objects single with two eyes’. The principles he invokes in his answer serve at the same time to explain why we do occasionally see objects double. In Part (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  29. Right, Left, and the Fourth Dimension.James van Cleve - 1987 - Philosophical Review 96 (1):33-68.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  30. The Philosophy of Right and Left: Incongruent Counterparts and the Nature of Space.James Van Cleve & Robert E. Frederick - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (2):459-466.
  31.  50
    Semantic Supervenience and Referential Indeterminacy.James Van Cleve - 1992 - Journal of Philosophy 89 (7):344 - 361.
  32. Rates of Passage.James van Cleve - 2011 - Analytic Philosophy 52 (3):141-170.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. Reid's Response to the Skeptic.James van Cleve - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.
  34.  60
    If Meinong Is Wrong, Is McTaggart Right?James Van Cleve - 1996 - Philosophical Topics 24 (1):231-254.
  35. Touch, Sound, and Things Without the Mind.James Van Cleve - 2006 - Metaphilosophy 37 (2):162-182.
    Two notable thought experiments are discussed in this article: Reid's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with tactile sensations alone could acquire the conception of extension and Strawson's thought experiment about whether a being supplied with auditory sensations alone could acquire the conception of mind-independent objects. The experiments are considered alongside Campbell's argument that only on the so-called relational view of experience is it possible for experiences to make available to their subjects the concept of mind-independent objects. I consider (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  36.  92
    Putnam, Kant and Secondary Qualities.James Van Cleve - 1995 - Philosophical Papers 24 (2):83-109.
  37. Sosa on Easy Knowledge and the Problem of the Criterion.James Van Cleve - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 153 (1):19-28.
  38. I. The Principles of Veracity and Credulity.James Van Cleve - 2006 - In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  39.  13
    Reid’s Answer to Molyneux’s Question.James Van Cleve - 2007 - The Monist 90 (2):251-270.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40.  39
    Logicism and Formal Necessity: Reflections on Kant’s Modal Metaphysics.James Van Cleve - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (3):449-459.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  67
    Matter, Space and Quality: Reflections on Unger's All the Power in the World.James Van Cleve - 2010 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 80 (2):457-466.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Emergence Vs. Panpsychism: Magic or Mind Dust?James Van Cleve - 1990 - Philosophical Perspectives 4:215-226.
  43.  55
    Why a Set Contains its Members Essentially.James Van Cleve - 1985 - Noûs 19 (4):585-602.
  44.  17
    Minimal Truth Is Realist Truth.James Van Cleve - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):869-875.
  45. Reflections on Kant's Second Antimony.James Van Cleve - 1981 - Synthese 47 (3):481-494.
  46.  51
    Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Commentary for Students. [REVIEW]James Van Cleve - 1977 - Teaching Philosophy 2 (3/4):387-388.
  47.  20
    Reid on Perception, Knowledge, and Will: Replies to Hill, Rysiew, and Yaffe.James Van Cleve - 2018 - Analytic Philosophy 59 (4):551-571.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Left, Right, and Higher Dimensions'.James Van Cleve - 1991 - In James Van~Cleve & Robert E. Frederick (eds.), The Philosophy of Right and Left. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  49.  3
    Probability and Certainty: A Reexamination of the Lewis-Reichenbach Debate.James Van Cleve - 1977 - Philosophical Studies 32 (4):323-334.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  50. F Three Versions of the Bundle\ V Theory J.James Van Cleve - 1998 - In S. Laurence C. MacDonald (ed.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 90